JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

State ordered to pay stationery supplier $300,000

by

Derek Achong
2113 days ago
20190724

The State has been or­dered to pay a lit­tle over $300,000 in com­pen­sa­tion to a sta­tionery sup­pli­er, who was owed for goods sup­plied to the Min­istry of Lo­cal Gov­ern­ment and Rur­al De­vel­op­ment since 2015.

De­liv­er­ing an oral judg­ment at the end of a brief tri­al at the Hall of Jus­tice in Port-of-Spain on Tues­day, High Court Judge Frank Seep­er­sad ruled that busi­ness­man Bob­by Mun­gal and his com­pa­ny KBM En­ter­pris­es were en­ti­tled to the com­pen­sa­tion de­spite not hav­ing a writ­ten con­tract with the min­istry.

Seep­er­sad re­ject­ed the min­istry’s claims over the va­lid­i­ty of the oral agree­ment be­tween Mun­gal and of­fi­cials of the min­istry as he stat­ed that records, show­ing that the min­istry pur­chased $1.8 mil­lion in sup­plies from the com­pa­ny dur­ing their busi­ness deal­ings be­tween 2008 and 2014, proved that the min­istry had a run­ning ac­count with it and was re­quired to clear the out­stand­ing bal­ance.

In his judg­ment, Seep­er­sad crit­i­cised the min­istry’s of­fi­cials for en­gag­ing in the arrange­ment.

“This court takes ju­di­cial no­tice of the fact that though there ex­ists many prac­tice and pol­i­cy di­rec­tives, far too many pub­lic au­thor­i­ties op­er­ate on an ad hoc ba­sis and prop­er pro­cure­ment prac­tices are not en­gaged...This type of op­er­a­tion has to cease and every ef­fort has to be made to adopt and im­ple­ment prop­er pro­cure­ment prac­tices,” Seep­er­sad said.

He al­so sug­gest­ed that such arrange­ments put small busi­ness own­ers in a pre­car­i­ous po­si­tion.

“Busi­ness­es are then caught in the web and are placed in un­ten­able sit­u­a­tions as their eco­nom­ic sur­vival be­comes con­tin­gent up­on the whims and fan­cies of of­fi­cials,” he said.

Ac­cord­ing to the ev­i­dence pre­sent­ed dur­ing the tri­al, when the arrange­ment be­gan in 2008, Mun­gal’s com­pa­ny agreed to pro­vide cred­it to the min­istry on the pro­vi­sion that the pay­ment is made with­in six months.

The com­pa­ny cut ties with the min­istry in June 2015 af­ter it failed to ad­here to the pay­ment plan un­der the agree­ment. At the time, the min­istry’s charge ac­count was $323,281.36 in deficit.

Seep­er­sad or­dered the State to pay the statu­to­ry in­ter­est on the debt, start­ing from the date of his judge­ment, un­til it cleared.

Mun­gal and his com­pa­ny were rep­re­sent­ed by Reah Sookhai, while Rachel Thurab and Ryan Grant rep­re­sent­ed the State.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored