JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Tongue-lashing for Kamla from Govt, UNC MP over Biden rebuke

by

Dareece Polo
35 days ago
20250122

DA­REECE PO­LO

Se­nior Re­porter

da­reece.po­lo@guardian.co.tt

Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar has faced scathing crit­i­cism over her con­tro­ver­sial re­marks about for­mer Unit­ed States pres­i­dent Joe Biden, whose ad­min­is­tra­tion she de­scribed as a “dis­as­ter”.

But in re­sponse to those crit­i­cisms, which al­so came from with­in her par­ty, she dou­bled down on her com­ments, in­sist­ing that she would not change her po­si­tion.

For­eign Af­fairs Min­is­ter Dr Amery Browne was among her harsh­est de­trac­tors, tak­ing to Twit­ter on Mon­day night to de­scribe her com­ments as “most in­ap­pro­pri­ate, in­ju­di­cious, in­ept, im­pru­dent, fawn­ing, tact­less, reck­less, ob­se­quious, in­tem­per­ate, and ill-ad­vised ut­ter­ance to date.”

Speak­ing with Guardian Me­dia out­side Par­lia­ment yes­ter­day, Browne fur­ther ripped in­to Per­sad-Bisses­sar, call­ing her state­ment a “dis­as­ter”—the same term she re­cent­ly used against Biden.

In her bruis­ing chas­tise­ment of Biden, Per­sad-Bisses­sar al­so ac­cused him of be­ing too fo­cused on push­ing a “woke, ex­treme left-wing agen­da” that she said of­fend­ed ba­sic com­mon sense and moral­i­ty—a stark con­trast to her Face­book post ex­act­ly four years ago on Jan­u­ary 21, 2021, when she con­grat­u­lat­ed Biden on be­com­ing pres­i­dent and ex­pressed op­ti­mism for a good work­ing re­la­tion­ship be­tween T&T and Wash­ing­ton.

How­ev­er, her pub­lic re­buke of the for­mer US pres­i­dent, be­fore the ink dried on his suc­ces­sor Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s sign­ing, earned her Browne’s stern con­dem­na­tion.

“I think that last phrase, “a dis­as­ter,” re­al­ly prop­er­ly en­cap­su­lates the most re­cent me­dia re­lease of the leader of the Op­po­si­tion. It’s very dis­ap­point­ing, even by her al­ready low stan­dards. Some of the lan­guage and phras­ing be­ing used is at best, undiplo­mat­ic, and at worst, com­plete­ly ill-ad­vised and ac­tu­al­ly dan­ger­ous to the in­ter­est of Cari­com, of Trinidad and To­ba­go,” he added.

Browne said the dis­course was com­plete­ly in­ap­pro­pri­ate and was not en­cour­aged among state of­fice­hold­ers. He re­it­er­at­ed T&T’s non-in­ter­ven­tion­ist po­si­tion on oth­er na­tions’ pol­i­tics.

“We do not get in­volved in the do­mes­tic po­lit­i­cal af­fairs of oth­er coun­tries to the de­gree that she seems to feel might be ad­van­ta­geous to her po­lit­i­cal prospects. I don’t think they are ad­van­ta­geous to her po­lit­i­cal prospects at all, but I am even more con­cerned about the im­pli­ca­tions to the good, short-term, medi­um-term and long-term re­la­tions that are im­por­tant for na­tions like Trinidad and To­ba­go,” he said.

“We don’t have a big army; we don’t have huge re­sources. We de­pend on pru­dent, re­spon­si­ble and wise diplo­mat­ic en­gage­ments which are con­veyed in many way. Hope­ful­ly, wis­er heads will pre­vail,” he added.

Govt unit­ed in cri­tique

Gov­ern­ment min­is­ters and one Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment sen­a­tor were unit­ed in their con­dem­na­tion.

Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Fitzger­ald Hinds cheek­i­ly stat­ed: “I am tempt­ed to say that the op­po­si­tion leader is a dis­as­ter, but I wouldn’t say that.”

Labour Min­is­ter Stephen Mc Clashie said, “It’s un­for­tu­nate and I think for a sea­soned politi­cian, those com­ments have no place in a na­tion that is not un­der the pro­tec­torate or any­thing from the US gov­ern­ment to make those kinds of state­ments. It re­al­ly, in my opin­ion, is undig­ni­fied and com­plete­ly lack­ing of po­lit­i­cal wis­dom.”

Sen­a­tor An­cil Den­nis said, “The com­ments were un­for­tu­nate and an em­bar­rass­ment to the peo­ple of Trinidad and To­ba­go,” while Tourism Min­is­ter Ran­dall Mitchell added, “I think it was ex­treme­ly im­politic. I think it has the po­ten­tial to dam­age our diplo­ma­cy and diplo­mat­ic re­la­tions with the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca.”

Mean­while, the PNM Na­tion­al Women’s League con­demned Per­sad-Bisses­sar’s com­ments as reck­less and dam­ag­ing to not just the US but T&T’s stand­ing on the world stage. The league said her sen­ti­ments risked un­der­min­ing that part­ner­ship, harm­ing our in­ter­na­tion­al rep­u­ta­tion and iso­lat­ing the coun­try.

Rai: She needs to ex­er­cise ‘greater sober thought’ in her state­ments

Even with­in the Op­po­si­tion, one of the so-called dis­si­dents, Dr Rai Rag­bir chas­tised Per­sad-Bisses­sar, urg­ing her to ex­er­cise “greater sober thought” in her pub­lic state­ments.

The Cu­mu­to/Man­zanil­la MP al­so ex­pressed dis­ap­point­ment in her com­ments, which he be­lieves can un­der­mine T&T’s long­stand­ing re­la­tion­ship with the US.

“State­ments that sin­gle out spe­cif­ic po­lit­i­cal fig­ures in the Unit­ed States, par­tic­u­lar­ly when phrased in a way that could be per­ceived as par­tial or in­flam­ma­to­ry, risk un­der­min­ing our long­stand­ing re­la­tion­ship with the US,” he said.

“This re­la­tion­ship has been built on decades of mu­tu­al re­spect and co­op­er­a­tion, re­gard­less of which ad­min­is­tra­tion is in pow­er. It is cru­cial that we adopt a con­sis­tent and non-par­ti­san ap­proach to our for­eign pol­i­cy, en­sur­ing that our en­gage­ments are pro­fes­sion­al, con­struc­tive, and in the best in­ter­est of our cit­i­zens.”

Rag­bir added, “We must al­so re­mem­ber that US for­eign pol­i­cy does not re­volve around any one in­di­vid­ual. It is guid­ed by in­sti­tu­tion­al frame­works, long-term strate­gies, and a col­lec­tive ap­proach from the Pres­i­dent, Con­gress, and var­i­ous agen­cies. By mak­ing re­marks that ap­pear po­lit­i­cal­ly bi­ased, we could in­ad­ver­tent­ly alien­ate key stake­hold­ers who are es­sen­tial to pre­serv­ing and strength­en­ing this re­la­tion­ship,” he con­tin­ued.

He al­so ex­pressed con­cern that the op­po­si­tion leader failed to con­sult with the par­ty be­fore pub­licly de­clar­ing the UNC’s pol­i­cy.

Mean­while, Prof Dr Ger­ard Hutchin­son, said while he had not heard or read the com­ments, he found them to be “a lit­tle ex­treme.”

In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor Suni­ty Ma­haraj weighed in, say­ing all po­lit­i­cal lead­ers should pay at­ten­tion to the im­por­tance of in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions.

John backs Per­sad-Bisses­sar

Per­sad-Bisses­sar was sup­port­ed by one of her deputy po­lit­i­cal lead­ers, Sen­a­tor Jear­lean John, who said she was en­ti­tled to her opin­ion hav­ing seen the work of the Biden ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Mean­while, UNC in­ter­nal re­la­tions of­fi­cer Nicholas Mor­ris al­so de­fend­ed the po­lit­i­cal leader’s mes­sage, say­ing it was the cor­rect tone, essence and po­lit­i­cal­ly in touch with her diplo­ma­cy. He said her con­grat­u­la­to­ry mes­sage need­ed to place the na­tion in­to “the good books” of the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion con­sid­er­ing the cur­rent gov­ern­ment’s strained re­la­tion­ship with Trump.

He said the mes­sage of­fered hope that a UNC gov­ern­ment would be open, pro­gres­sive, sta­ble, sup­port the prin­ci­ples of democ­ra­cy and align with the present US gov­ern­ment.

How­ev­er, in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions ex­pert Dr An­tho­ny Gon­za­lez told Guardian Me­dia that he was as­ton­ished by the op­po­si­tion leader’s com­ments. He said it does not bode well for T&T’s in­ter­ests and warned that she should be mind­ful that Biden can re­turn to of­fice.

NTA slams ‘di­vi­sive’ rhetoric

The Na­tion­al Trans­for­ma­tion Al­liance has al­so con­demned the op­po­si­tion leader’s state­ment, ac­cus­ing the per­son who penned her re­lease of lack­ing an un­der­stand­ing of in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions.

NTA leader Gary Grif­fith said the re­lease was ei­ther a fail­ure of sound diplo­mat­ic judge­ment or she was a vic­tim of poor ad­vice. Re­spond­ing to her com­ments re­gard­ing the “woke agen­da,” Grif­fith said it was di­vi­sive.

“While a more mod­ern in­ter­pre­ta­tion of the term in­cludes di­vi­sive el­e­ments such as bi­o­log­i­cal men com­pet­ing in women’s sports, the term orig­i­nal­ly emerged from African Amer­i­can Ver­nac­u­lar Eng­lish (AAVE) to de­scribe height­ened aware­ness of so­cial and racial in­jus­tices.

“Giv­en the re­al­i­ties of Trinidad and To­ba­go’s racial, eth­nic, and trib­al di­vi­sions, any­thing that could fur­ther fu­el this di­vide must be avoid­ed.”

Grif­fith said states­man­like con­duct and diplo­mat­ic dis­ci­pline dic­tate that those who rep­re­sent T&T must nev­er be seen to favour one ad­min­is­tra­tion over the oth­er. He fur­ther not­ed that the re­lease risks alien­at­ing a sig­nif­i­cant seg­ment of Amer­i­can lead­er­ship and so­ci­ety, in­clud­ing those who may re­turn to of­fice in the fu­ture.

Op­po­si­tion Leader not back­ing down, re­it­er­ates con­dem­na­tion

Mean­while, Per­sad-Bisses­sar stands by her com­ments, go­ing fur­ther to de­scribe the Biden ad­min­is­tra­tion as “an ab­solute dis­as­ter.”

She itemised 20 points to jus­ti­fy her re­jec­tion of Biden, some of which have been dis­proven, such as the claim that pu­ber­ty block­ers can be giv­en to teens with­out parental con­sent. Over the past three years, 26 Re­pub­li­can-con­trolled US states have passed laws re­strict­ing gen­der-af­firm­ing care for mi­nors. Most of the laws ban pu­ber­ty block­ers, hor­mone treat­ment and surgery for those un­der 18.

The 20 points are as fol­lows:

1. Tam­pons in teenage boys’ bath­rooms

2. Pu­ber­ty block­ers for teens with­out parental con­sent

3. Gen­der re­as­sign­ment surgery for chil­dren

4. Sex­u­al­i­sa­tion and groom­ing of chil­dren un­der the guise of hu­man rights

5. Adult men use the same pub­lic wash­rooms as lit­tle girls and women

6. Drag queen shows in schools and li­braries in front of kids

7. Bi­o­log­i­cal men par­tic­i­pat­ing in women’s sports

8. The slaugh­ter of 18,000 chil­dren in Gaza

9. Gen­der pro­nouns

10. Forced health man­dates

11. De­fund­ing the po­lice

12. The re­moval of re­li­gion from schools and pub­lic in­sti­tu­tions

13.The per­se­cu­tion of per­sons for hold­ing to their re­li­gious be­liefs

14. Can­cel cul­ture

15. Virtue sig­nalling

16. So­cial me­dia shad­ow-ban­ning

17. Two-tiered jus­tice sys­tem

18. Weapon­i­sa­tion of the ju­di­cial sys­tem against per­sons with op­pos­ing opin­ions

19. Cen­sor­ship of free speech

20. High lev­els of in­fla­tion, crime, nepo­tism and cor­rup­tion

“Peo­ple want com­mon sense poli­cies and equal op­por­tu­ni­ties based on mer­it, ex­cel­lence, and in­tel­li­gence and are fed up with woke far left, non­sen­si­cal poli­cies that are based on the use of iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics, moral su­pe­ri­or­i­ty and di­vi­sion. Peo­ple just want to live and en­joy their lives and be hap­py with­out the state in­trud­ing on their per­son­al space,” she said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored