JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Hart's shock res­ig­na­tion:

Udecott appeal in limbo

by

20100307

Any plans the Ur­ban De­vel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion of Trinidad and To­ba­go (Ude­cott) had of ap­peal­ing ur­gent­ly, last Fri­day's judg­ment, has been thrown in lim­bo, by the shock res­ig­na­tion of its ex­ec­u­tive chair­man, Calder Hart. Hours af­ter the judg­ment on Fri­day, both in-house and ex­ter­nal at­tor­neys for Ude­cott were ea­ger to go to the Court of Ap­peal to get a stay of Prof John Uff hand­ing in his re­port to Pres­i­dent George Maxwell Richards this week. But on Sat­ur­day, Hart, who had been un­der two years of con­stant pres­sure, re­signed, not on­ly as ex­ec­u­tive chair­man of Ude­cott, but as chair­man of four oth­er state boards.

Hart, his wife Sher­rine, and daugh­ter Jean, then flew out to Mi­a­mi on Sat­ur­day, for what a close friend said was a short vis­it "to re­lieve him­self from all the re­cent pres­sures." The oth­er mem­bers of the Ude­cott board have not met, so no in­struc­tions were giv­en to their at­tor­neys to go to the Court of Ap­peal. The ur­gent ap­pli­ca­tion to stay de­liv­ery of the re­port will not hap­pen to­day, as Ude­cott of­fi­cials are still try­ing to un­der­stand the round­about de­ci­sion tak­en by Hart to leave im­me­di­ate­ly. There were un­con­firmed re­ports yes­ter­day that Uff was fly­ing in to present the re­port to the Pres­i­dent, but no one was able to con­firm this.

The re­port was ex­pect­ed on two pre­vi­ous oc­ca­sions, the last be­ing Feb­ru­ary 28, but be­cause of the court case, there was an un­der­tak­ing that it would not be hand­ed over un­til judg­ment was giv­en. On Fri­day, Jus­tice Mi­ra Dean-Ar­mor­er, pre­sid­ing in Port-of-Spain High Court, dis­missed Ude­cott's ju­di­cial re­view in which the state com­pa­ny claimed that the Uff Com­mis­sion­ers were bi­ased to­wards Ude­cott and Hart. In her 142-page judg­ment, Dean-Ar­mor­er or­dered that the fi­nal re­port be hand­ed in by the oth­er two of the four com­mis­sion­ers –Uff and Desmond Thorn­hill.

Ude­cott, how­ev­er, was able to get an or­der from the court to say that the de­ci­sion of the com­mis­sion­ers to re­ceive a mem­o­ran­dum pre­pared by for­mer com­mis­sion­er, Ken­neth Sir­ju, and to an­nex that re­port to the com­mis­sion of en­quiry's re­port, was il­le­gal, null and void. Dean-Ar­mor­er grant­ed an or­der of cer­tio­rari to quash the de­ci­sion of the com­mis­sion­ers to re­ceive such an ex­tra­ne­ous mem­o­ran­dum and an­nex it to the com­mis­sion of en­quiry's re­port. She al­so or­dered Ude­cott to pay 7/8ths of the costs to the Uff Com­mis­sion, de­fen­dants in the mat­ter.

Two com­mis­sion­ers, Ken­neth Sir­ju and Is­rael Khan, SC, re­signed last year from the com­mis­sion, so they won't be part of the fi­nal re­port.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored