JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

UN rejects US resolution that urges an end to the Ukraine war without noting Russian aggression

by

Newsdesk
19 days ago
20250224
FILE - Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy addresses the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Sept. 25, 2024, at UN headquarters. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson, File)

FILE - Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy addresses the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Sept. 25, 2024, at UN headquarters. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson, File)

Julia Demaree Nikhinson

In a win for Ukraine on the third an­niver­sary of Rus­sia’s in­va­sion, the U.N. Gen­er­al As­sem­bly on Mon­day re­fused to ap­prove a U.S.-backed res­o­lu­tion that urged an end to the war with­out men­tion­ing Moscow’s ag­gres­sion. In­stead, it ap­proved a Eu­ro­pean-backed Ukrain­ian res­o­lu­tion de­mand­ing Rus­sia im­me­di­ate­ly with­draw its forces, which the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion op­posed.

It was a set­back for the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion in the 193-mem­ber world body, whose res­o­lu­tions are not legal­ly bind­ing but are seen as a barom­e­ter of world opin­ion. But it al­so showed some di­min­ished sup­port for Ukraine, whose res­o­lu­tion passed 93-18, with 65 ab­sten­tions. That’s low­er than pre­vi­ous votes, which saw more than 140 na­tions con­demn Rus­sia’s ag­gres­sion and de­mand its im­me­di­ate with­draw­al.

The Unit­ed States had tried to pres­sure the Ukraini­ans to with­draw their res­o­lu­tion in fa­vor of its pro­pos­al, in­clud­ing a last-minute ap­peal by U.S. deputy am­bas­sador Dorothy Shea. Ukraine re­fused, and the as­sem­bly ap­proved three Eu­ro­pean-pro­posed amend­ments adding lan­guage to the U.S. pro­pos­al mak­ing clear that Rus­sia in­vad­ed its small­er neigh­bor in vi­o­la­tion of the U.N. Char­ter.

The vote on the amend­ed U.S. res­o­lu­tion was 93-8 with 73 ab­sten­tions, with Ukraine vot­ing “yes,” the U.S. ab­stain­ing and Rus­sia vot­ing “no.”

Ukrain­ian Deputy For­eign Min­is­ter Mar­i­ana Bet­sa said her coun­try is ex­er­cis­ing its “in­her­ent right to self-de­fense” fol­low­ing Rus­sia’s in­va­sion, which vi­o­lates the U.N. Char­ter’s re­quire­ment that coun­tries re­spect the sov­er­eign­ty and ter­ri­to­r­i­al in­tegri­ty of oth­er na­tions.

“As we mark three years of this dev­as­ta­tion — Rus­sia’s full in­va­sion against Ukraine — we call on all na­tions to stand firm and to take … the side of the Char­ter, the side of hu­man­i­ty and the side of just and last­ing peace, peace through strength,” she said. Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump has of­ten stat­ed his com­mit­ment to bring­ing “peace through strength.”

U.S. en­voy Shea, mean­while, said mul­ti­ple pre­vi­ous U.N. res­o­lu­tions con­demn­ing Rus­sia and de­mand­ing the with­draw­al of Russ­ian troops “have failed to stop the war,” which “has now dragged on for far too long and at far too ter­ri­ble a cost to the peo­ple in Ukraine and Rus­sia and be­yond.”

“What we need is a res­o­lu­tion mark­ing the com­mit­ment from all U.N. mem­ber states to bring a durable end to the war,” Shea said.

The du­el­ing res­o­lu­tions re­flect the ten­sions that have emerged be­tween the U.S. and Ukraine af­ter Trump sud­den­ly opened ne­go­ti­a­tions with Rus­sia in a bid to quick­ly re­solve the con­flict. They al­so un­der­score the strain in the transat­lantic al­liance over the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ex­tra­or­di­nary turn­around on en­gage­ment with Moscow. Eu­ro­pean lead­ers were dis­mayed that they and Ukraine were left out of pre­lim­i­nary talks last week, and the as­sem­bly met as Trump was host­ing French Pres­i­dent Em­manuel Macron in Wash­ing­ton..

In es­ca­lat­ing rhetoric, Trump has called Ukrain­ian Pres­i­dent Volodymyr Ze­len­skyy a “dic­ta­tor,” false­ly ac­cused Kyiv of start­ing the war and warned that he “bet­ter move fast” to ne­go­ti­ate an end to the con­flict or risk not hav­ing a na­tion to lead. Ze­len­skyy re­spond­ed by say­ing Trump was liv­ing in a Russ­ian-made “dis­in­for­ma­tion space.”

The Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion then not on­ly de­clined to en­dorse Ukraine’s U.N. res­o­lu­tion, but at the last minute pro­posed its own com­pet­ing res­o­lu­tion.

The U.S. al­so wants a vote on its pro­pos­al in the more pow­er­ful U.N. Se­cu­ri­ty Coun­cil, where res­o­lu­tions are legal­ly bind­ing and it has ve­to pow­er along with Rus­sia, Chi­na, Britain and France. Chi­na, which holds the coun­cil pres­i­den­cy this month, has sched­uled it for Mon­day af­ter­noon.

A U.S. of­fi­cial, speak­ing on con­di­tion of anonymi­ty be­cause the coun­cil had not yet tak­en up the U.S. res­o­lu­tion, said the Unit­ed States would ve­to any amend­ments by Rus­sia or the Eu­ro­peans.

The Gen­er­al As­sem­bly has be­come the most im­por­tant U.N. body on Ukraine be­cause the 15-mem­ber Se­cu­ri­ty Coun­cil, which is charged with main­tain­ing in­ter­na­tion­al peace and se­cu­ri­ty, has been par­a­lyzed by Rus­sia’s ve­to pow­er.

Since Rus­sia forces stormed across the bor­der on Feb. 24, 2022, the Gen­er­al As­sem­bly has ap­proved half a dozen res­o­lu­tions that have con­demned the in­va­sion and de­mand­ed the im­me­di­ate pull­out of Russ­ian troops.

The very brief orig­i­nal U.S. res­o­lu­tion ac­knowl­edges “the trag­ic loss of life through­out the Rus­sia-Ukraine con­flict” and im­plores “a swift end to the con­flict and fur­ther urges a last­ing peace be­tween Ukraine and Rus­sia.” It nev­er men­tions Moscow’s in­va­sion.

France’s U.N. am­bas­sador, Nico­las De Riv­iere, on be­half of more than 20 Eu­ro­pean coun­tries, pro­posed the three amend­ments, which he said “re­flect the re­al sit­u­a­tion in Ukraine — that of a war of ag­gres­sion led by Rus­sia against its neigh­bor.”

The first re­places “Rus­sia-Ukraine con­flict” with “full-scale in­va­sion of Ukraine by the Russ­ian Fed­er­a­tion.” The sec­ond reaf­firms the as­sem­bly’s com­mit­ment to Ukraine’s sov­er­eign­ty, in­de­pen­dence, uni­ty and ter­ri­to­r­i­al in­tegri­ty with­in its in­ter­na­tion­al­ly rec­og­nized bor­ders. The third calls for a just, last­ing and com­pre­hen­sive peace in Ukraine that re­spects the U.N. Char­ter and the prin­ci­ples of sov­er­eign­ty and ter­ri­to­r­i­al in­tegri­ty.

Rus­sia’s U.N. am­bas­sador, Vass­i­ly Neben­zia, told re­porters last week that the orig­i­nal U.S. res­o­lu­tion was “a good move.”

He pro­posed an amend­ment that would add the phrase “in­clud­ing by ad­dress­ing its root caus­es” so the fi­nal line of the U.S. res­o­lu­tion would read, “im­plores a swift end to the con­flict, in­clud­ing by ad­dress­ing its root caus­es, and fur­ther urges a last­ing peace be­tween Ukraine and Rus­sia.”

The Gen­er­al As­sem­bly al­so ap­proved that amend­ment Mon­day, but Rus­sia didn’t sup­port the amend­ed res­o­lu­tion be­cause it points a fin­ger clear­ly at Moscow for start­ing the war.

The Ukraine res­o­lu­tion refers to “the full-scale in­va­sion of Ukraine by the Russ­ian Fed­er­a­tion” and re­calls the need to im­ple­ment all pre­vi­ous as­sem­bly res­o­lu­tions “adopt­ed in re­sponse to the ag­gres­sion against Ukraine.”

It sin­gles out the as­sem­bly’s de­mand that Rus­sia “im­me­di­ate­ly, com­plete­ly and un­con­di­tion­al­ly with­draw all of its mil­i­tary forces from the ter­ri­to­ry of Ukraine with­in its in­ter­na­tion­al­ly rec­og­nized bor­ders.”

It stress­es that any in­volve­ment of North Ko­re­an troops fight­ing along­side Rus­sia’s forces “rais­es se­ri­ous con­cerns re­gard­ing fur­ther es­ca­la­tion of this con­flict.”

The res­o­lu­tion reaf­firms the as­sem­bly’s com­mit­ment to Ukraine’s sov­er­eign­ty and al­so “that no ter­ri­to­r­i­al ac­qui­si­tion re­sult­ing from the threat or use of force shall be rec­og­nized as le­gal.”

It calls for “a de-es­ca­la­tion, an ear­ly ces­sa­tion of hos­til­i­ties and a peace­ful res­o­lu­tion of the war against Ukraine” and it re­it­er­ates “the ur­gent need to end the war this year.”

UNIT­ED NA­TIONS (AP)

Instagram


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored