JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, May 4, 2025

Van Dyke slams Moonilal’s ‘fake news’

by

Shaliza Hassanali
2026 days ago
20191017

CEO of Sun­stone Eq­ui­ty John Van Dyke yes­ter­day slammed Op­po­si­tion MP Dr Roodal Mooni­lal for spread­ing fake news ‘like US Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’ and be­ing a ‘pet­ty politi­cian’ as the coun­try ap­proach­es the De­cem­ber 2 lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tion.

Van Dyke was re­spond­ing yes­ter­day to Mooni­lal who in his bud­get con­tri­bu­tion on Tues­day called on the Oil­field Work­ers Trade UNion (OW­TU) pres­i­dent An­cel Ro­get, Move­ment for So­cial Jus­tice head David Ab­du­lah and him to an­swer whether for­mer Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment can­di­date Vidya De­ok­iesingh was in­volved in set­ting up a meet­ing at the premis­es of A&V Drilling with re­spect to Petrotrin re­fin­ery sale.

But Van Dyke fired back, stat­ing that Mooni­lal was on­ly cre­at­ing mis­chief and his al­le­ga­tions were to­tal non­sense.

“I don’t know where he comes up with these fan­ta­sy sto­ries...grant­ed the fact that it is an elec­tion com­ing up. He is prob­a­bly fol­low­ing Mr Trump’s lead in putting fake news out there. It’s ut­ter non­sense.”

He de­scribed Mooni­lal’s rant as a storm in a teacup and base­less.

Van Dyke said he has no time with “pet­ty politi­cians” when asked if would sue Mooni­lal for slan­der­ing his name and mak­ing false al­le­ga­tions.

“Let him look in the mir­ror and if he can sleep with him­self, then that is fine. I don’t have time for this. We have way too many projects on the go right now.”

At no time, Van Dyke said he met or in­ter­act­ed with De­ok­iesingh.

“I don’t know who he is. Sor­ry! The on­ly peo­ple who I have dealt with while I was in Trinidad were the OW­TU, its mem­bers and my staff that we hired.”

Van Dyke said he does not get in­volved in pol­i­tics or po­lit­i­cal par­ties.

Mooni­lal spoke about pho­tographs that sur­faced on so­cial me­dia with Ro­get, Ab­dul­lah and Van Dyke sign­ing an en­gage­ment con­tract.

He in­sist­ed the pho­tographs were tak­en at OW­TU’s head­quar­ters, San Fer­nan­do, last year by an OW­TU mem­ber and not De­ok­iesingh.

Last Oc­to­ber Sun­Stone was re­tained by the OW­TU as an in­vest­ment bank to find fi­nanc­ing for the re­fin­ery and to put for­ward the sale of the project.

“Oth­er than that I have not been in­volved in the deal. We tried to bring it to a con­clu­sion un­for­tu­nate­ly at the time the OW­TU did not have a writ­ten op­tion from the Gov­ern­ment nor from the cur­rent board of Petrotrin.”

He said Sun­Stone could not pro­ceed any fur­ther.

“The project got stalled in re­spect to the re­la­tion­ship be­tween us and the OW­TU. I ba­si­cal­ly said call me when you get that. And that is where we left it off. Right now we are mov­ing on with all the stuff we are do­ing. If I get a phone call from them I would be very hap­py.”

The last con­ver­sa­tion Van Dyke held with the OW­TU was ten months ago.

Van Dyke said Sun­Stone in their en­gage­ment put for­ward “ three op­tions” (in­ter­na­tion­al clients) who were in­ter­est­ed in the re­fin­ery which he re­fused to name.

Those clients were in­ter­na­tion­al oil com­pa­nies.

He said three coun­tries ex­pressed an in­ter­est­ed in the re­fin­ery’s pur­chase- Suri­nam, Guyana and Bar­ba­dos.

“I just thought if the four sov­er­eign na­tions ( T&T in­clud­ed) were joint ven­ture part­ners with the OW­TU as a mi­nor­i­ty own­er, it would cause a win-win for all par­ties in­volved. It would be sad to see that Petrotrin (re­fin­ery) would be­long to the his­to­ry books. It is a vi­able busi­ness.”

How­ev­er, he said it turned out to be “po­lit­i­cal­ly sen­si­tive. Prob­a­bly it was more of a pipe dream on our side. I will tell you this. I be­lieve Petrotrin is a very valu­able as­set and strate­gi­cal­ly they are in a very good place with the ma­jor oil finds in Guyana which is up­wards of nine mil­lion bar­rels of oil a day.”

Van Dyke said the pro­pos­al put for­ward by Pa­tri­ot­ic En­er­gies and Tech­nolo­gies Com­pa­ny Ltd- a com­pa­ny whol­ly owned by the OW­TU of up­front cash of US$700 mil­lion for the re­fin­ery Sun­Stone was not privy to.

“But I can tell you it would not be a dif­fi­cult deal to put to­geth­er on that ba­sis.”

In his es­ti­ma­tion, Van Dyke said Petrotrin is worth over $2 bil­lion.

As of now, Van Dyke could not say which com­pa­nies were now in­ter­est­ed in the re­fin­ery.

He knew the com­pa­nies that had ex­pressed an in­ter­est last Oc­to­ber.

“But as far as I know none of those par­ties are present­ly in­volved in this lat­est pro­pos­al.”

Van Dyke said OW­TU agreed to pay Sun­Stone ex­pens­es to put the pro­pos­al to­geth­er.

“We charged them US$150,000 on a three-month con­sult­ing con­tract and we were to be re­ward­ed a two per cent if we were suc­cess­ful in rais­ing at that par­tic­u­lar time $1 bil­lion to do the deal.”

He said the OW­TU ac­cept­ed their terms and they worked two months on the project “un­til we came to the re­al­i­ty of them not be­ing able to get a writ­ten op­tion which they had al­ways said they would get.”

Sun­Stone, Van Dyke said was on­ly paid US$50,000 by OW­TU.

“We are still owed US$100,000.”

He hopes the project comes to a con­clu­sion and they be paid even­tu­al­ly.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored