JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

Woman awarded $60,000 for assault, false imprisonment during 2011 SoE

by

4 days ago
20250312
Justice Frank Seepersad

Justice Frank Seepersad

Derek Achong

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

A High Court Judge has or­dered over $60,000 in com­pen­sa­tion for a 48-year-old woman, who, along with her friends, was tor­tured by a group of sol­diers and Coast Guard of­fi­cers dur­ing the last State of Emer­gency (SoE) in 2011. 

Jus­tice Frank Seep­er­sad or­dered the com­pen­sa­tion for Su­jes McIn­tosh as he up­held her false im­pris­on­ment and as­sault and bat­tery case against the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al af­ter pre­sid­ing over a tri­al be­tween Mon­day and yes­ter­day. 

The in­ci­dent from which the law­suit stemmed oc­curred at a house on Gas­pa­ree Is­land on Au­gust 31, 2011. 

McIn­tosh claimed that she and her then-boyfriend Ryan Hen­ry were stay­ing with a group of friends at a house when T&T De­fence Force (TTDF) per­son­nel ar­rived to con­duct a search.

She claimed that the of­fi­cers and sol­diers sep­a­rat­ed the men and women in­to two groups. 

She claimed that the sol­diers in­ter­ro­gat­ed the men and as­sault­ed them. Dur­ing the as­sault, the sol­diers re­port­ed­ly cut Hen­ry’s dread­locks. 

McIn­tosh claimed that she and the oth­er women were forced to kneel and giv­en cas­es of beer bot­tles to hold over their heads. 

She claimed that the sol­diers ac­cused them of be­ing les­bians and ques­tioned why they were lim­ing with the men, who they (the sol­diers) de­scribed as ug­ly. 

She said that af­ter the sol­diers told them to put down the cas­es, one slapped her across her face. 

She claimed that she saw the sol­diers force the men to walk in­to the wa­ter in front of the house un­til it reached their necks be­fore or­der­ing them to re­turn to shore. 

McIn­tosh said that af­ter the of­fi­cers and sol­diers failed to find any­thing il­le­gal in the house, they took both groups to the Coast Guard’s Staubles Bay base in Ch­aguara­mas. 

They then took the more se­ri­ous­ly in­jured of the friends to the hos­pi­tal for treat­ment. 

In her law­suit, McIn­tosh claimed that she still suf­fered from post-trau­mat­ic stress dis­or­der from the in­ci­dent. 

Sev­er­al of the sol­diers and of­fi­cers tes­ti­fied be­fore Jus­tice Seep­er­sad and de­nied McIn­tosh’s and Hen­ry’s claims of wrong­do­ing.

In de­cid­ing the case, Jus­tice Seep­er­sad not­ed that he be­lieved McIn­tosh’s ver­sion of the events over the claims made by the law en­force­ment of­fi­cials. 

“She did in­stil in the court an un­shake­able feel­ing that she was a wit­ness of truth,” he said. 

He found in­con­sis­ten­cies in the of­fi­cials’ claims as he point­ed out that one of the most se­nior among them mis­tak­en­ly claimed that the women were found on the beach but lat­er ad­mit­ted that they were in­side the house when they ar­rived. 

Jus­tice Seep­er­sad not­ed that while the TTDF of­fi­cials had spe­cial pow­ers to stop, search and in­ter­ro­gate civil­ians dur­ing the SoE, they had to have rea­son­able sus­pi­cion and pur­pose. 

“A state of emer­gency can nev­er au­tho­rise of­fi­cers to ter­rorise cit­i­zens or to tram­ple up­on their con­sti­tu­tion­al rights and pro­tec­tions,” he said. 

Not­ing that there were mul­ti­ple sim­i­lar law­suits aris­ing out of that SoE, Jus­tice Seep­er­sad said, “It was a very re­ac­tionary state of af­fairs as op­posed to well-co­or­di­nat­ed and planned op­er­a­tions.”

Jus­tice Seep­er­sad crit­i­cised the of­fi­cials for their “com­plete­ly un­ac­cept­able” con­duct. 

“This is not the type of con­duct that could ever be found to be ac­cept­able for those dis­charg­ing law en­force­ment du­ties,” he said. 

Jus­tice Seep­er­sad or­dered $25,000 in dam­ages for as­sault and bat­tery and $25,000 for false im­pris­on­ment. The state was al­so or­dered to pay $10,000 in ex­em­plary dam­ages for the of­fi­cials’ con­duct and her le­gal costs for the law­suit.

Jus­tice Seep­er­sad or­dered in­ter­est on all the com­pen­sa­tion ex­cept ex­em­plary dam­ages start­ing from when the case was filed in 2016.

Stat­ing that he was dis­tressed by the de­lay in re­solv­ing the case but not­ed that it was due to it (the case) be­ing re-dock­et­ed to him af­ter a col­league left it un­fin­ished when he was pro­mot­ed to the Court of Ap­peal. 

In May 2019, High Court Judge Mar­garet Mo­hammed up­held a sim­i­lar case from Hen­ry’s cousin Calvin La Vende, who was among the group. La Vende was award­ed $160,000 in com­pen­sa­tion. 

McIn­tosh was rep­re­sent­ed by Garvin Nar­ine-Ram­sep­a­ul and Sand­hyaa Ram­ber­ran.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored