National Security Minister Stuart Young yesterday gave his full support to Commissioner of Police Gary Griffith’s “One shot, one kill” directive to officers who are shot at by would-be criminals.
Griffith adopted the mantra in October, after police officers were involved in a shootout in Trou Macaque, Laventille, in which five people were killed. He reaffirmed it this week after escaped prisoner Teddy Singh, Tony Keron Joseph and Clace Daniel Phillip were also killed in a police-involved shooting in a forested area in Maturita, Arima. (See other story)
Griffith’s new use of force police policy has drawn criticism from Fixin T&T head Kirk Waite, who says this statement and further rhetoric points to the militarisation of the police service. Both men have engaged in a war of words over the matter.
Questioned on the approach at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing however, Young said police officers have his full support provided their action falls within the precincts of the law
“If police officers come under fire from criminals it is well within the law for police officers to return fire not only to defend themselves as individuals but also public safety and if that is the realm that they operate in then they have my full support- once they operate within the parameters of the law,” Young said.
The particular “one shot, one kill” term is used by military and refers to precision shooting in delivering one shot to the head.
While refraining from specific reference to the term and its intent yesterday, Young explained the line of fire is extremely volatile.
“I’ve seen it suggested out there that police officers in instances should shoot for body parts etcetera, etcetera ... I suspect in a gunfight it just simply doesn’t operate that way because there’s a lot coming at you - it’s in a very short space of time. Anyone who has ever handled firearms etcetera knows that this concept of shoot them in the leg, shoot him in his leg - it just doesn’t operate that way.
“If criminals go and decide they going to shoot at police officers, men and women of the Defence Force, I would expect and the law does provide for them to protect themselves.”
But according to Police Complaints Authority head David West, there was no “one shot, one kill policy” within the T&T Police Service’s Use of Force Policy. He also pointed out that there is no “shoot to disarm” policy. West, however, agreed with Young that if so challenged, police can return fire in self-defence and in the interest of public safety.
Also contacted yesterday, Fixin T&T president Waithe challenged Griffith, Young, Police Social and Welfare Association and the Police Complaints Authority to show him and the country where “one shot, one kill” is inscribed in the TTPS’ use of force policy or in the training of police officers.
In direct response to Young on the matter, Waithe told Guardian Media many of the mentioned authorities refused to engage directly the term and its intent.
“Where is this a part of police training and use of force policy? One shot, one kill is about sniper training, military training. It’s not about policing. The combination of that mantra with the Commissioner’s use of words like “cockroaches” and “animals” to describe people of this country who he believes are involved criminals activity is dangerous,” Waithe said.
He further cautioned: “We maintain the Police Commissioner’s rhetoric is putting his very officers, our very officers, at risk.”