JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 3, 2025

Regional Associations: Ban Wallace and friends, not TTFA

by

Walter Alibey - Senior Sports Reporter
1748 days ago
20200521

There is now a col­lec­tive call by rep­re­sen­ta­tives of four out of the six re­gion­al as­so­ci­a­tions - South­ern FA (SFA), East­ern FA (EFA), Cen­tral FA (CFA) and the East­ern Coun­ties Foot­ball Union - for the oust­ed T&T Foot­ball As­so­ci­a­tion (TTFA) ex­ec­u­tive to face the penal­ty for the coun­try if it is to be banned for vi­o­la­tion of the FI­FA Statutes.  

Speak­ing to Guardian Me­dia Sports on Wednes­day, Shymdeo Go­sine, pres­i­dent of CFA to­geth­er with EFA pres­i­dent Kieron Ed­wards, Ter­rance Quashie of the East­ern Coun­ties, and Richard Quan Chan, pres­i­dent of the SFA have cham­pi­oned the call for the Unit­ed TTFA team to be banned and not the TTFA.

How­ev­er, Har­vey Jack, who spoke on be­half of the To­ba­go Foot­ball As­so­ci­a­tion (TFA), de­spite the fact that the As­so­ci­a­tion don't have an ex­ist­ing ex­ec­u­tive, said while he does not sup­port a de­ci­sion for the coun­try to be banned, he is sup­port­ing the prin­ci­pled stand be­ing tak­en by Wal­lace and his team.

Fed up that they would not be giv­en a fair tri­al by the Court of Ar­bi­tra­tion for Sports (CAS) to fight against, what they con­sid­er to be, an un­fair de­ci­sion by foot­ball's supreme body - FI­FA - to re­place their de­mo­c­ra­t­i­cal­ly elect­ed ex­ec­u­tive with a FI­FA-ap­point­ed Nor­mal­i­sa­tion Com­mit­tee on March 17, the Unit­ed TTFA team of for­mer pres­i­dent William Wal­lace and his vice-pres­i­dents Clynt Tay­lor, Joseph Sam Phillip and Su­san Joseph-War­rick, on Mon­day agreed to take its bat­tle to the High Court in Port-of-Spain, which was a di­rect vi­o­la­tion of the TTFA con­sti­tu­tion and FI­FA Statutes, which po­si­tions T&T to be banned.

How­ev­er, the mem­bers of the re­spec­tive re­gion­al as­so­ci­a­tion said the de­ci­sion by Wal­lace and com­pa­ny was not a rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the foot­ball fra­ter­ni­ty, or ei­ther the Board of Di­rec­tors, who are the de­ci­sion-mak­ing team in lo­cal foot­ball.

Quan Chan, Quashie, Ed­wards and Go­sine all said their as­so­ci­a­tions were nev­er con­sult­ed be­fore the de­ci­sion was made, and there­fore, they do not sup­port it.

Go­sine, the CFA boss said the rule states clear­ly that au­to­mat­ic sus­pen­sion will be hand­ed down to the Mem­ber As­so­ci­a­tion that car­ries FI­FA to the lo­cal court.

“Then why do we have peo­ple, who claim to care about foot­ball, who would make such a de­ci­sion and get our coun­try banned. Tell me who is ad­vis­ing them, tell me where is the think­ing?”

He calls on the Caribbean Foot­ball Union (CFU), CON­CA­CAF and whichev­er oth­er en­ti­ty that could help them con­vince FI­FA, that if it is con­sid­er­ing ban­ning T&T, then it (FI­FA) should ban the mem­bers in­di­vid­u­al­ly in­stead.

“Keep them out of T&T foot­ball be­cause they are not think­ing about the ef­fect it would have on the coun­try and foot­ballers as a whole. For me, they are all self­ish,” Go­sine said. “We need to sep­a­rate these peo­ple from foot­ball. We have gone past this fight against FI­FA for a long time be­cause we know that FI­FA can help us, so we must sup­port the Nor­mal­i­sa­tion Com­mit­tee.”

Ed­wards, the EFA boss said his as­so­ci­a­tion is set to have an emer­gency meet­ing to dis­cuss the de­ci­sion to go to the high court and whether the Unit­ed TTFA had al­so vi­o­lat­ed its own con­sti­tu­tion, apart from the FI­FA statutes.

Ar­ti­cle 67 of the TTFA con­sti­tu­tion states: “In ac­cor­dance with the rel­e­vant pro­vi­sions of the FI­FA Statutes, any ap­peal against a fi­nal and bind­ing de­ci­sion passed by FI­FA, CON­CA­CAF or the Leagues, shall be heard by the CAS un­less an­oth­er ar­bi­tra­tion tri­bunal has ju­ris­dic­tion in ac­cor­dance with Art. 69. CAS shall not, how­ev­er, hear ap­peals on vi­o­la­tions of the Laws of the Game and sus­pen­sions of up four match­es or up to three months (ex­cept for dop­ing de­ci­sions). 2 TTFA shall en­sure its full com­pli­ance and that of all those sub­ject to its ju­ris­dic­tion with any fi­nal de­ci­sion passed by a FI­FA body, by a CON­CA­CAF body, by the Ar­bi­tra­tion Tri­bunal recog­nised by TTFA or the CAS.”

Ed­wards said all this will be dis­cussed as well as the fact that no com­mu­ni­ca­tion, ad­vice or con­sul­ta­tion was made with his as­so­ci­a­tion and they, there­fore, view the de­ci­sion to go to the high court as a reck­less one. Like Go­sine, he said he sup­ports the call for in­di­vid­ual sanc­tions on the mem­bers who de­cid­ed to go to the high court and not on the coun­try.

Should T&T be banned by FI­FA, there will be no fu­ture for the young play­ers try­ing to com­pete at the CFU, CON­CA­CAF, Women's tour­na­ments, as well as the CON­CA­CAF Gold Cup, FI­FA World Cup Qual­i­fiers and In­ter­na­tion­al Club com­pe­ti­tions.

Mean­while, both Quan Chan and Quashie made it clear they will not sup­port any de­ci­sion that will re­sult in T&T foot­ball be­ing sus­pend­ed. Both said since the de­ci­sion was made by the few mem­bers, then they should face the penal­ty, as their de­ci­sion was not made with the in­volve­ment of the SFA or East­ern Coun­ties.

Quashie said he be­lieves Wal­lace was neg­a­tive­ly in­flu­enced. The coun­try faces a pos­si­ble ban by FI­FA, sim­i­lar to sev­er­al oth­er coun­tries that have been sus­pend­ed by the world gov­ern­ing body in­clud­ing In­done­sia, Pak­istan, Nige­ria and Cameroon, among oth­ers.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored