JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, April 5, 2025

Amid pan­dem­ic, par­ties turns to the in­ter­net

Digital campaigning

by

1725 days ago
20200715

Dig­i­tal cam­paigns are be­com­ing in­creas­ing­ly sig­nif­i­cant in the lo­cal elec­toral con­text as po­lit­i­cal par­ties, whether big or small, gar­ner sup­port for the up­com­ing Au­gust 10 gen­er­al elec­tion in light of COVID-19 re­stric­tions.

The coro­n­avirus pan­dem­ic has dis­rupt­ed many of the ways po­lit­i­cal cam­paigns would nor­mal­ly be con­duct­ed, in­clud­ing mass ral­lies.

Even door-to-door can­vass­ing in large num­bers is frowned up­on giv­en the risk for spread­ing the virus.

Ac­cord­ing to the Eco­nom­ic Times, Unit­ed Stat­ed pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump and de­moc­rats Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders had lit­tle choice but to call off large-scale pub­lic events in favour of pol­i­tick­ing on­line and over the air­waves.

Po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Dr Mukesh Bas­deo told the Busi­ness Guardian that COVID-19 is dri­ving peo­ple to spend more and more time on­line and it is clear that, in the ab­sence of ral­lies and in-per­son cam­paign events, reach­ing vot­ers where they are—in this case on their couch­es, through con­nect­ed TV, pod­casts, dig­i­tal ra­dio, and so­cial me­dia is crit­i­cal.

He said while digi­ti­sa­tion has been on the rise for the last ten years. How­ev­er it was in the last five years that so­cial me­dia ce­ment­ed it­self in var­i­ous ways via nu­mer­ous plat­forms.

This, Bas­deo said, has proven to be very use­ful for po­lit­i­cal par­ties.

“So­cial me­dia has pro­vid­ed po­lit­i­cal par­ties with an op­por­tu­ni­ty to tar­get a spe­cif­ic pop­u­la­tion. In us­ing the tech­nol­o­gy you find those tar­get­ed are of a cer­tain age group from about 18 to 40 years. They would be fa­mil­iar with tech­nol­o­gy as they would be fa­mil­iar with a smart phone,” Bas­deo ex­plained.

Ac­cord­ing to the in­dex­mun­di.com, which tracks glob­al de­mo­graph­ics, in 2018, 69.66 per cent of T&T’s pop­u­la­tion was be­tween 15 and 64 years, with 44.99 per cent in the age range 25 to 54.

This rep­re­sents more than 540,000 vot­ing age adults who ma­tured when it was pos­si­ble to be­come dig­i­tal­ly ca­pa­ble.

Bas­deo cit­ed that tech­nol­o­gy was al­so in­stru­men­tal in the cam­paign­ing of for­mer US pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma.

“He (Oba­ma) used tech­nol­o­gy in the con­text where each Amer­i­can vot­er got a mes­sage where it seemed that he was ac­tu­al­ly speak­ing to each per­son,” Bas­deo said.

Since then, Bas­deo not­ed, tech­nol­o­gy has been used more pro­found­ly in cam­paign­ing.

But dig­i­tal cam­paign­ing has its draw­backs.

The old­er pop­u­la­tion for in­stance, may be more in­clined to the tra­di­tion­al meth­ods, Bas­deo ex­plained.

He said those be­tween 50 to 70 years may be still caught in the 20th cen­tu­ry, adding that they may be more ac­quaint­ed with live meet­ings.

“Us­ing tele­vi­sion for cam­paign­ing has not picked up. One week has passed in the lo­cal elec­tion sea­son and we haven’t seen the air time al­lo­cat­ed to po­lit­i­cal par­ties, maybe this will pick-up af­ter nom­i­na­tion day,” Bas­deo not­ed.

• Con­tin­ues on Page 5

End­less pos­si­bil­i­ties

So­cial me­dia plat­forms pro­vide po­lit­i­cal par­ties with a big­ger win­dow to tell a big­ger sto­ry, Bas­deo said.

That win­dow in­cludes the pri­ma­ry plat­forms: In­sta­gram, YouTube, Face­book, and Twit­ter

Ac­cord­ing to Forbes, mar­ket­ing doesn’t have to be ex­pen­sive, but it needs to be strate­gised smart­ly to pro­vide big re­turns.

Bas­deo ex­plained the dig­i­tal world pro­vides end­less pos­si­bil­i­ties to use high­ly tar­get­ed mar­ket­ing to reach the ex­act au­di­ence which in turn cut costs when com­pared to tra­di­tion­al ad­ver­tis­ing like full page print ads.

The World Eco­nom­ic Fo­rum has not­ed that the coro­n­avirus has caused a con­sid­er­able drop in ad­ver­tis­ing spend­ing.

It said ad spends are down nine per cent on av­er­age across Eu­rope, with Ger­many and France falling by sev­en and 12 per cent re­spec­tive­ly.

Cut­ting the cost

Tech­nol­o­gy al­lows for a cheap­er means of cam­paign­ing.

A spokesman for the lo­cal ad­ver­tis­ing agen­cies as­so­ci­a­tion said dig­i­tal ad­ver­tis­ing is al­ready play­ing a key role for emerg­ing po­lit­i­cal par­ties since they lack the fi­nanc­ing to run “large scale above-the-line” cam­paigns.

“Dig­i­tal is a low-cost medi­um. I cer­tain­ly know the small­er par­ties like the in­de­pen­dents are en­gag­ing their au­di­ence via so­cial me­dia be­cause they don’t have large con­trib­u­tors to do the big me­dia cam­paigns. To run a large cam­paign you need mon­ey,” he said.

He ex­plained dig­i­tal is about con­tent cre­ation adding that a de­cent cam­paign on Face­book for in­stance, can be bought for the price of two full colour news­pa­per ads.

A full page news­pa­per ad, he said, at the best rates cost be­tween $8,000 to $10,000.

A Face­book cam­paign has a longer life span as it can run for as long as a month.

Ad­ver­tis­ing met­rics, he added, help as­cer­tain the progress of dig­i­tal cam­paigns, what’s work­ing well and what needs to change.

“Dig­i­tal cam­paign­ing en­ables you to see the num­ber of likes on your page and which ones res­onat­ed with your au­di­ence for ex­am­ple. You can al­so know how many peo­ple clicked on your ads en­abling par­ties to run those ads for a longer time than the ones which were less pop­u­lar,” he said.

The spokesman said com­pared to print cam­paign­ing, it is dif­fi­cult to de­ci­pher who reads the pa­per and how much time is spent on a par­tic­u­lar ad.

The Busi­ness Guardian reached out to some po­lit­i­cal par­ties which con­firmed that dig­i­tal is not on­ly a cheap­er way to reach au­di­ences but is al­so faster.

Ani­ta Haynes, the UNC’s can­di­date for Tabaquite and the par­ty’s PRO, added that dig­i­tal cam­paign­ing is al­so an av­enue to reach younger vot­ers.

“It’s a mix­ture of both for the par­ty be­cause we have al­so main­tained our pres­ence via walk­a­bouts in com­mu­ni­ties. We are al­so aware that in some rur­al com­mu­ni­ties res­i­dents may have some ac­cess to the In­ter­net so in those ar­eas stream­ing may not be as ef­fec­tive,” Haynes ex­plained.

She said the par­ty has al­ready es­tab­lished strong so­cial me­dia chan­nels which have been ef­fec­tive for mes­sag­ing.

“Even pri­or to the lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tion we en­gaged in pre-bud­get con­sul­ta­tion and com­mu­ni­ty en­gage­ments and we put these on­line which were at a much re­duced cost be­cause you’re not pay­ing for ma­jor broad­cast,” Haynes added.

Prime air time, she ex­plained can cost as much as $20,000 giv­en the com­pe­ti­tion for space es­pe­cial­ly as the elec­tion draws near­er.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored