JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Re­pub­lic Bank econ­o­mist, Garvin Joe­field:

2.4% GDP growth for T&T in 2025

by

GEISHA KOWLESSAR-ALONZO
125 days ago
20241211

GEISHA KOW­LESSAR-ALON­ZO

With en­er­gy sec­tor rev­enue not pro­ject­ed to in­crease sub­stan­tial­ly, the for­eign ex­change mar­ket is ex­pect­ed to re­main very tight over the next two years, while gov­ern­ment’s fis­cal con­straints are en­vis­aged to linger. In this re­gard, the thrust to com­plete and gain sig­nif­i­cant mo­men­tum in key pub­lic projects in 2025 could re­sult in a larg­er fis­cal deficit than the 2.9 per cent of GDP pro­ject­ed in the 2025 bud­get, while pub­lic debt could rise fur­ther.

This is the fore­cast of Garvin Joe­field, econ­o­mist at Re­pub­lic Bank Ltd dur­ing an in­ter­view with the Busi­ness Guardian.

In shar­ing fur­ther thoughts on what the T&T econ­o­my could look like in 2025, Joe­field said over­all, re­al GDP is ex­pect­ed to grow by 2.4 per cent in 2025 but it could re­main be­low pre-pan­dem­ic lev­els.

“The per­for­mance of the en­er­gy sec­tor is ex­pect­ed to im­prove slight­ly in 2025 with new gas out­put sched­uled to come on­stream dur­ing the year. This in­cludes the joint ven­ture be­tween EOG Re­sources (EOG) and bpTT, tar­get­ting the Teak, Samaan and Poui, Men­to and Reg­gae acreages (Feb­ru­ary 2025), bpTT’s Cypre project (March 2025) and new out­put from Touch­stone Ex­plo­ration’s Cas­cadu­ra field (Au­gust 2025),” he said.

Ac­cord­ing to Joe­filed, amid a de­cline in pro­duc­tion from ma­ture fields, these projects may help to slow the con­trac­tion, even as they are not ex­pect­ed to cause a sig­nif­i­cant in­crease in gas pro­duc­tion.

In this re­gard, they could pro­vide a tem­po­rary ease as the coun­try looks for­ward to de­vel­op­ing the larg­er gas re­serves that strad­dle its bor­der with Venezuela, in­clud­ing Cocuina-Man­akin, Drag­on and Man­a­tee. How­ev­er, he not­ed that with US Pres­i­dent-elect Don­ald Trump’s ad­min­is­tra­tion set to as­sume con­trol in Jan­u­ary 2025, there is, un­der­stand­ably, sig­nif­i­cant con­cern that these projects could be im­pact­ed by new US sanc­tions on Venezuela.

Joe­field added that no ma­jor in­crease in glob­al oil and gas prices is pre­dict­ed to oc­cur in 2025, notwith­stand­ing the re­cent de­ci­sion by OPEC+ to de­lay the re­ver­sal of a por­tion of its pro­duc­tion cuts to April 2025.

To sup­port prices, he not­ed the group cut a to­tal of 5.9 mil­lion bar­rels per day (b/d) from its out­put in a se­ries of agree­ments dat­ing back to 2022, stat­ing that it had pre­vi­ous­ly an­nounced plans to be­gin to grad­u­al­ly re­verse those cuts in Jan­u­ary 2025.

How­ev­er, with down­ward pres­sures on prices due to weak­ened glob­al de­mand and in­creased out­put from oth­er sup­pli­ers, OPEC+ de­cid­ed to grad­u­al­ly re­turn 2.2 mil­lion b/d of pro­duc­tion start­ing in April 2025 and to ex­tend the re­main­ing 3.7 mil­lion b/d cuts to the end of 2026.

Re­gard­ing the non-en­er­gy sec­tor, Joe­field said this area is ex­pect­ed to ex­pand fur­ther in 2025, with pos­i­tive per­for­mances ex­pect­ed in trade and re­pairs, trans­port and stor­age, man­u­fac­tur­ing and con­struc­tion. Nev­er­the­less, he warned that fre­quent and/or ex­tend­ed in­dus­tri­al ac­tion by trade unions rep­re­sent a ma­jor down­side risk for the sec­tor.

Per­tain­ing to the con­struc­tion in­dus­try, Joe­field said this is like­ly to re­ceive a boost as gov­ern­ment moves to com­plete key projects in the lead-up to the gen­er­al elec­tion next year.

How­ev­er, Joe­field al­so warned this is not guar­an­teed as pub­lic projects of­ten en­counter sig­nif­i­cant de­lays.

“Giv­en the vi­tal role pub­lic sec­tor con­struc­tion plays in lift­ing the en­tire sec­tor, any de­lays in the ex­e­cu­tion of gov­ern­ment’s cap­i­tal bud­get could con­strain the per­for­mance of the in­dus­try. For in­stance, gov­ern­ment al­lo­cat­ed ap­prox­i­mate­ly $6 bil­lion dol­lars for cap­i­tal ex­pen­di­ture in each of the last two fis­cal years but was on­ly able to ex­haust $4.2 bil­lion in 2023 and $4.5 bil­lion in 2024. The un­spent sums rep­re­sent lost po­ten­tial stim­u­lus for con­struc­tion and the wider econ­o­my,” he ex­plained.

Eco­nom­ic re­view

In the non-en­er­gy sec­tor, the over­all per­for­mance was pos­i­tive but not with­out chal­lenges.

The Min­istry of Fi­nance, in its 2024 Re­view of the Econ­o­my (ROE), fore­cast the con­struc­tion sec­tor to ex­pand by 2.3 per cent in 2024, af­ter con­tract­ing by 3.2 per cent in 2023.

How­ev­er, Joe­field said judg­ing by do­mes­tic ce­ment sales, which are usu­al­ly a good gauge of the health of the sec­tor, an ac­cel­er­a­tion of con­struc­tion ac­tiv­i­ty may be re­quired in the fourth quar­ter for that pro­jec­tion to be re­alised.

He al­so not­ed that dur­ing the first three quar­ters of 2024, do­mes­tic ce­ment sales in­creased by 1.5 per cent year-on-year sug­gest­ing pos­i­tive ac­tiv­i­ty, but al­so that the sec­tor did not gain sig­nif­i­cant mo­men­tum, fol­low­ing 2023’s weak per­for­mance.

The 2.9 per cent de­cline in ce­ment sales that oc­curred in the first quar­ter of 2024 off­set some of the im­pact of in­creased sales in the two suc­ceed­ing quar­ters.

Ac­cord­ing to Joe­field, giv­en the link be­tween con­struc­tion sec­tor ac­tiv­i­ty and ce­ment sales, it was no sur­prise that the fall in sales in the first quar­ter was ac­com­pa­nied by a rise in un­em­ploy­ment in con­struc­tion sec­tor to 8.7 per cent from 6.1 per cent in the pre­vi­ous quar­ter and 7.2 per­cent in the first quar­ter of 2023.

The lat­est avail­able da­ta in­di­cate that un­em­ploy­ment in the sec­tor av­er­aged 8.6 per cent in the first half of 2024 com­pared to 6.7 per cent in Jan­u­ary to June 2023, he added.

The ROE al­so sug­gest­ed that the rate of eco­nom­ic ex­pan­sion in the trade and re­pairs sec­tor and the trans­port and stor­age sec­tor will slow from 9.3 per cent to 3 per cent and from 6.4 per cent to 2.1 per cent, re­spec­tive­ly.

Joe­field said as it re­lat­ed to the trade and re­pairs sec­tor, new mo­tor ve­hi­cle sales are reg­u­lar­ly used as a gauge of ac­tiv­i­ty for at least a por­tion of the sec­tor.

In the first nine months of 2024, new mo­tor ve­hi­cle sales in­creased by 9.4 per cent com­pared to the same pe­ri­od a year ear­li­er, he not­ed, stat­ing that this rel­a­tive­ly fast rate of ex­pan­sion com­pared to the pro­ject­ed growth for the sec­tor may be a sign of a mixed per­for­mance among the in­dus­tries in the sec­tor and/or a faster-than-pro­ject­ed ex­pan­sion in the trade and re­pairs sec­tor.

Giv­en its close re­la­tion­ship to the trade and re­pair sec­tor, it is no sur­prise that the trans­port and stor­age sec­tor is al­so ex­pect­ed to record a no­tably slow­er rate of growth in 2024, he added.

Al­so, in the man­u­fac­tur­ing sec­tor, Joe­field said ac­tiv­i­ty is ex­pect­ed to ex­pand by 2.7 per cent af­ter a 6.1 per cent con­trac­tion in 2023.

He fur­ther not­ed that the food, bev­er­ages and to­bac­co sub-sec­tor is pre­dict­ed to post a 9.1 per cent re­cov­ery in 2024, af­ter shrink­ing by 2 per cent in the pre­vi­ous year.

This sub-sec­tor, Joe­field said, has been the fastest grow­ing of all man­u­fac­tur­ing in­dus­tries in re­cent times, ex­pand­ing by 31.7 per cent in 2022, part­ly re­flec­tive of its re­cov­ery from the dis­lo­ca­tions caused by the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic.

Un­for­tu­nate­ly, he not­ed the man­u­fac­tur­ing sec­tor ex­pe­ri­enced a rise in un­em­ploy­ment to 4.9 per cent (av­er­age) in the first six months of 2024 from 3.5 per cent in the same pe­ri­od a year ear­li­er, stat­ing that this may be a sign of a weak­er ex­pan­sion than pre­vi­ous­ly en­vis­aged, at least in the first six months of the year.

Joe­field fur­ther not­ed that with en­er­gy rev­enue flag­ging, gov­ern­ment con­tin­ued to face se­vere fis­cal chal­lenges in 2024.

Dur­ing the fis­cal year, to­tal rev­enue fell 7.9 per cent to $50.4 bil­lion, with en­er­gy rev­enue plung­ing by 48.4 per cent to $14.7 bil­lion.

On the oth­er hand, non-en­er­gy rev­enue ex­pand­ed by 26 per cent to $32.7 bil­lion, re­flec­tive of the sec­tor’s con­tin­ued growth in 2024.

He said the fall in to­tal rev­enue was ac­com­pa­nied by a mar­gin­al de­cline (0.6 per­cent) in to­tal ex­pen­di­ture to $57.5 bil­lion.

These de­vel­op­ments caused the fis­cal deficit to ex­pand to 3.5 per cent of GDP in the 2024 fis­cal year from 1.7 per cent of GDP in 2023.

The larg­er deficit ex­ert­ed ad­di­tion­al up­ward pres­sure on the coun­try’s pub­lic debt, which in­creased to 75.6 per cent of GDP from 72.1 per cent in the 2023 fis­cal year.

Against a back­drop of falling en­er­gy rev­enue, the mar­ket for for­eign ex­change re­mained very tight in 2024, giv­en con­tin­ued strong de­mand from busi­ness­es and con­sumers.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored