Since December 2023, ten Massy Holdings senior executives and independent non-executive directors have departed from the company, according to the material disclosure notices posted by the company, one of the largest, oldest and most profitable and geographically diverse groups in the Caricom region. (See sidebar)
In the last six weeks, four of the top executive managers at Massy Motors and Machines, resigned from the company.
And in the last 18 months, sources told the Business Guardian, 26 employees of Massy’s financial services arm, which employs just over 50 people, left the company, some after working there for less than one month.
Checks by this publication have revealed that a former employee of the group has initiated legal action in T&T’s High Court for wrongful dismissal.
But there are others who have left the company in the last 18 months who are afraid to take legal action challenging their terminations.
One former Massy employee who spoke, on the strict condition of absolute confidentiality because of a fear of victimisation, said the hesitation over taking Massy to court for wrongful dismissal was because of the length of time such action could take, the cost of litigation as well as the fact that at least six of those who have left the group signed a document committing not to contest their departures.
At least six employees have had to sign what is being called a two-letter separation package. One employee related their experience:
• The employee was called into a meeting and presented with a letter of termination, signed by the manager of the division or portfolio;
• The employee was told in the termination letter of the loss of confidence by the board or management in the employee’s ability to continue to perform their duties;
• The employee is then given the option of retiring from the company. The retirement option forms part of an agreement of release and discharge, in which the employee agrees to release and discharge Massy from any litigation or claim made by the employee and not to ever disclose the terms of the agreement;
• Guardian Media was shown a copy of the non-disclosure agreement by an employee, who said that they were pressured to sign the document immediately without having the benefit of legal or industrial relations advice; and
• Some of the employees Guardian Media spoke with say that after they were separated from the group, their attempts to gain employment elsewhere were being scuppered when prospective employers called Massy for reference checks and were told only negative things about the employee.
Last week, this publication sought a response from Massy deputy CEO and president, James McLetchie, to the issues raised by former and current employees of the group.
Those issues included:
1) That employees of the group have received the two-letter separation package, to resign with a package, or to be terminated;
2) That the employees of Massy Motors and Machines are in a state of panic over the departure of four executives in the last six weeks;
3) That there does not seem to have been any succession planning at Motors and Machines;
4) That given McLetchie’s other duties at Massy, he is not likely to provide effective oversight of the division for anything longer than the immediate short term; and
5) That the departure of the four executives from Motors and Machines is related to issues surrounding access to forex and the need to rightsize the division.
In his response, McLetchie said, “This is all unfortunate and inaccurate speculation. As a matter of policy, we don’t discuss personnel matters publicly, and therefore I will not comment except to say that its leadership (Massy Motors and Machines) will be in good hands with a focus on its people and customers..
On Tuesday, Massy announced that Ryan Latchu, currently the president of Toyota T&T, was set to replace Marc Rostant (see sidebar) as the executive vice president and portfolio CEO of Massy Motors and Machines.
Asked to comment on the issue of the two-letter separations, industrial relations expert Courtenay McNish said:
“The two-letter approach used by a company to separate an executive may not be fair, but it is not illegal.
“There is no law stopping a company from ending the service of a senior employee, as long as that separation conforms with the executive’s contract of employment and the company can communicate a rationale, or cause, why it wants to separate an employee.
“That is because an executive of a company does not have the protection of the Industrial Relations Act that a worker would have.
“On the other hand, all employees of companies, executives or workers, have the protection of the principles of natural justice.
“That means executives have the right to be informed of the reasons the company wants to separate them, and they have the right to be heard in their own defence.
“The jurisprudence on the principles of natural justice and industrial relations matters is clear, up to and including the local Court of Appeal’s judgment, delivered by Nolan Bereaux, in February 2025 in the matter of Jwala Rambarran v the Ministry of Finance.
“So the fair approach in separating an executive would be for the company to bring its concerns about the executive’s performance to their attention and allow the executive the opportunity to respond.
“All separations must have a rationale. In other words, a company cannot just decide that they do not like an executive and they want to dismiss them.
On the issue of any approach aimed at the termination of the employment of an executive, McNish said, “A company is not obliged to take representation from an attorney-at-law while the executive continues to be employed. However, natural justice would dictate that an executive, faced with the threat of forced retirement, should be given an opportunity to seek advice which would enable them to make the best decision with respect to the option of resignation or dismissal.”
For the six months ended March 31, 2025, Massy’s Motors and Machines Portfolio generated $1.74 billion in third-party revenue, which was 22 per cent of revenue of $7.92 billion the group recorded for the period. Motors and Machines was Massy’s second largest third-party revenue generator, following Integrated Retail Portfolio, which recorded $5.04 billion, 63.6 per cent of the total.
For the period October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, Massy’s third-party revenue increased by 3.9 per cent to $7.92 billion, and its after-tax profit was up by 21.6 per cent to $376.1 million.
Ten Massy decision makers who left the company since December 2023
• Marc Rostant resigned as group executive director and portfolio CEO of Massy’s Motors and Machines Portfolio on July 8, effective July 8;
• Soraya Khan resigned as an independent non-executive director, effective March 7, 2025;
• Three independent, non-executive Massy Holdings directors—Peter Jeewan, Suresh Maharaj and Bruce Melizan— retired from the board on rotation, effective January 15, 2015, following the group’s decision to reduce the size of its directorship. A fourth Massy Holdings director, Vaughn Martin, the group’s executive director in charge of the Gas Products Portfolio, also retired from the holding company board in January;
• Julie Avey, group executive vice president, retired from the company effective May 31, 2024, according to a May 21, 2024 notice;
• Alberto Rozo resigned as senior vice-president strategy and business development of the Gas Products Portfolio, effective June 30, 2024;
• David O’Brian announced on March 8, 2024 that it was his intention to resign from the company effective June 8;
• Gervase Warner, Massy president and group CEO, announced on February 7, 2024 that he was proceeding with early retirement from the company and retiring from its board effective April 6, 2024; and
• Angélique Parisot-Potter, executive vice-president business integrity and group general counsel, resigned from the Company effective December 27, 2023.