Despite the threat of war in the Caribbean basin where large multinational energy giants currently operate, US energy economist Francisco Monaldi is optimistic that these investors will continue to invest in T&T and the rest of the region.
Monaldi is a lecturer in energy economics at Rice University’s Department of Economics in Texas, and a lecturer in energy management at the Jones Graduate of School of Business in Texas.
Large energy companies such as ExxonMobil, Chevron and BP all operate in Venezuela, T&T and Guyana where geopolitical tensions currently exist and it is the region where the US Government recently deployed military assets including a nuclear submarine.
On Friday, T&T’s Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar signed an energy deal with Grenada’s Prime Minister Dickon Mitchell and said her focus is on that at the moment when the media asked her for an update on the energy relationship with Venezuela.
Last month, the T&T Government also signed a production sharing agreement with US energy major ExxonMobil to explore T&T’s deep waters.
Prime Minister Persad-Bissessar said that it is estimated that ExxonMobil will incur expenditure of an estimated US$42.5 million in the mandatory first phase of the project and with success, the projected development costs could be between US$16.4 billion and US$21.7 billion.
Last week, Energy Minister Dr Roodal Moonilal told the Business Guardian that while T&T has a strong relationship with the United States and T&T continues to collaborate on security issues, it must also preserve space for dialogue with Venezuela.
During a televised programme last Wednesday in Venezuela, Venezuela’s Justice Minister Diosdado Cabello accused the United States of sabotaging the Dragon gas field project which he said cost T&T billions of dollars.
Cabello claimed that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio sees T&T as one of the “pawns” of the Caribbean and he referred to the failed Dragon gas deal between T&T and Venezuela.
He also said T&T’s relationship with the United States is like “selling its soul to the devil.”
“The US State Department sabotaged the Dragon gas project for two reasons. If it had materialised, T&T’s income could have exceeded US$2 billion annually in the first phase. This would have strengthened the position of T&T as the energy hub of the Caribbean and helped T&T to depend less on the United States,” Cabello said.
Business-friendly environment
Despite an increasing complex geopolitical and business environments, Monaldi told the Business Guardian that the big multinational energy companies continue to see countries like T&T and Guyana as destinations for investment for the simple reason that these countries are business friendly and oil and gas projects are economically viable.
“I do not think that foreign investors will be deterred from investing in T&T because of conditions in Venezuela. I am talking about the risks in Venezuela and doing anything in T&T’s waters, I do not think that is a risk. In the case of Guyana, Chevron or ExxonMobil will not be deterred from investing there. The United States will not let Venezuela intervene in Guyana. Guyana is much more profitable for Chevron.”
Yes, Chevron has a stake in the Stabroek Block, after the US energy company, earlier this year, completed its acquisition of Hess Corporation, which includes a 30 per cent stake in the block which is located off the coast of Guyana. This block is known for its significant oil reserves and is one of the fastest-growing oil provinces in the world.
“ExxonMobil will continue to be interested in T&T because one of the things that makes developing gas in Trinidad attractive is there is spare infrastructure. This is a bit speculative, but I think it will be a more attractive environment for ExxonMobil if the deals with Venezuela do not continue. That is a different angle.”
Speaking specifically about Venezuela where Chevron was recently given a green light to continue limited operations, Monaldi said without regime change and Venezuela’s reinsertion into the Western bloc of countries, it will continue to be difficult to get significant investments.
“But marginall,y if there are licences given the eagerness of the Venezuelan Government to attract investment, there might be some investment but it may not be significant. Also, the current Chevron licences seem to be a little bit less attractive than the one before. So, I think there will be slightly less growth in production that Venezuela had expected before. Overall, this is an impactful set of developments for some of these projects, but we have to keep in mind that things can change despite the economics being attractive right now.”
Venezuela energy relations
In April, former prime minister Stuart Young announced that the United States had revoked this country’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) licences, which facilitated the development of both the Dragon and Cocuina-Manakin gas fields.
Speaking last month, T&T’s Prime Minister said if Venezuela invades Guyana, T&T will allow the United States to use T&T as a military base to attack Venezuela. However, she did say that she wants to maintain good relations with Venezuela.
Despite Energy Minister Moonilal saying there will always be space for dialogue with Venezuela in energy and other matters, Monaldi opined that challenges will remain in the T&T energy sector.
“No doubt it is also harder to get the licences from the US especially with the escalation recently. In addition, the uncertainty for investors in a cross-border deal makes it harder to develop in these circumstances. The case of BP is different as they do not have to do much investments on the Venezuelan side. BP was granted the licences for the Cocuina fields in 2024.”
Monaldi said if there is a change of government in Venezuela and the gas field projects remain economically viable, then there will be a possibility for new contracts.
“I think that the economics are attractive enough that if there is a political change at some point, these deals might go through. However in the future, the economic conditions might change, the world demand for Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), the price for LNG and at some other point the window for opportunity might disappear. In the case of the Dragon gas field, if T&T discovers more gas and they fill all the LNG infrastructure, it may be that the economics of that field may be less attractive. A lot can change. But right now, the economics makes it that if there is political change, it might go through.”