JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 11, 2025

Employers can’t universally implement mandatory vaccination, says Industrial Court President

by

DEREK ACHONG
1392 days ago
20210917
President of the Industrial Court, Deborah Thomas-Felix. (Image courtesy Industrial Court of Trinidad and Tobago)

President of the Industrial Court, Deborah Thomas-Felix. (Image courtesy Industrial Court of Trinidad and Tobago)

DEREK ACHONG

 

In­dus­tri­al Court Pres­i­dent Deb­o­rah Thomas-Fe­lix has stat­ed that manda­to­ry vac­ci­na­tions can­not be im­ple­ment­ed uni­lat­er­al­ly by em­ploy­ers.

De­liv­er­ing her an­nu­al speech at the open­ing of the court's 2021/2022 Law Term at its head­quar­ters in Port-of-Spain, this morn­ing, Thomas-Fe­lix stat­ed that while em­ploy­ers are per­mit­ted to in­tro­duce a vac­ci­na­tion pol­i­cy for new em­ploy­ees, con­sul­ta­tion is manda­to­ry for it to ap­ply to ex­ist­ing work­ers.

Thomas-Fe­lix said: "In oth­er words, can such a pol­i­cy be in­tro­duced uni­lat­er­al­ly by em­ploy­ers in the work­place? The short an­swer to that ques­tion is NO."

"The in­tro­duc­tion of a COVID-19 vac­ci­na­tion pol­i­cy or any new pol­i­cy can amount to a ma­te­r­i­al change in the terms and con­di­tions of em­ploy­ment and ought to be im­posed uni­lat­er­al­ly," she added.

She not­ed that if work­ers or their recog­nised ma­jor­i­ty union can­not come to an agree­ment over such a pol­i­cy, they can take their dis­pute to the Min­istry of Labour or come di­rect­ly to the court through the fil­ing of an in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions of­fence.

Thomas-Fe­lix al­so sug­gest­ed that unions and em­ploy­ers con­sid­er adding COVID-19 re­lat­ed claus­es when en­ter­ing in­to ne­go­ti­a­tions for new col­lec­tive agree­ments.

Thomas-Fe­lix not­ed that while be­tween Jan­u­ary to March 2020 on­ly six in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions of­fences were filed at the court, 178 were filed be­tween March 2020 and Sep­tem­ber 14.

"Most of these in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions of­fences are com­plaints re­lat­ed to the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic and the ma­jor­i­ty of them per­tain to the lack of con­sul­ta­tion by em­ploy­ers with work­ers, the uni­lat­er­al al­ter­ations of terms and con­di­tions of em­ploy­ment and the fail­ure of em­ploy­ers to en­ter in­to col­lec­tive bar­gain­ing with unions to dis­cuss and re­solve COVID-19 re­lat­ed is­sues," Thomas-Fe­lix said.

She sug­gest­ed that the high rate of fil­ings demon­strat­ed the ab­sence of so­cial di­a­logue by many in the work­place.

"Uni­lat­er­al COVID-19-re­lat­ed de­ci­sions are caus­ing a de­te­ri­o­ra­tion of labour man­age­ment re­la­tions which is very trou­bling and does not au­gur well for in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty in the post-COVID-19 econ­o­my," Thomas-Fe­lix said.

“I strong­ly urge all par­tic­i­pants of the labour mar­ket to take note of this de­vel­op­ment and to make ef­forts to re­verse this," she added.

CourtCOVID-19employmentIndustrial Relations


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored