JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, March 16, 2025

Exiting Rowley says he must have done ‘something good’ in office

'I have no regrets'

by

Jesse Ramdeo
2 days ago
20250314
Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley responds to questions from journalists, from left, Seigonie Mohammed (TTT), Akash Samaroo (Guardian Media) and Juhel Browne (One Caribbean Media) at Whitehall, Port-of-Spain, on Tuesday.

Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley responds to questions from journalists, from left, Seigonie Mohammed (TTT), Akash Samaroo (Guardian Media) and Juhel Browne (One Caribbean Media) at Whitehall, Port-of-Spain, on Tuesday.

COURTESY:OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER

Jesse Ramdeo

Se­nior Re­porter

jesse.ramdeo@cnc3.co.tt

Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley has de­clared that he has “no re­grets” about his tenure as he looks to­ward re­tire­ment on Sun­day.

And as he pre­pares to ex­it the po­lit­i­cal land­scape, the Prime Min­is­ter says he has put his “life to ser­vice” and jok­ing­ly shared, “I some­times sing in the bath­room and my favourite tune is from the Sound of Mu­sic, some­where in my youth or child­hood, I must have done some­thing good.”

The com­ment came in a can­did fi­nal wide-rang­ing in­ter­view with jour­nal­ists from Guardian Me­dia, CCN TV6 and TTT at White­hall, Port-of-Spain, on Tues­day, which was broad­cast last night.

Row­ley re­flect­ed on his time in of­fice with a sense of ful­fil­ment, even as he ac­knowl­edged the chal­lenges faced by suc­ces­sive gov­ern­ments in steer­ing the na­tion through com­plex so­cial, eco­nom­ic, and po­lit­i­cal is­sues.

“You would have heard at least one Prime Min­is­ter I can think of, I think pos­si­bly two I know of, who would have said Trinidad and To­ba­go is a dif­fi­cult coun­try to gov­ern and it is large­ly be­cause we are a free peo­ple, who en­joy sig­nif­i­cant free­doms, free­dom to even waste your time, free­dom to play the fool, free­dom to make good when you can do bet­ter,” Dr Row­ley said.

He main­tained that con­trary to the be­lief by some in so­ci­ety, he had act­ed in the coun­try’s best in­ter­est, even if it meant mak­ing un­pop­u­lar de­ci­sions.

“I am not in the lega­cy busi­ness, you see thing about lega­cy and lega­cy and lega­cy, I’m not in that. I was in the busi­ness of say­ing this coun­try has been good to me. When I got in­to the po­lit­i­cal are­na, it was what I can do be­cause oth­er peo­ple be­fore me sac­ri­ficed.

“I wasn’t about run­ning to get the best-pay­ing job in the coun­try be­cause I had of­fers to work for oil com­pa­nies, I chose not to do that, I worked for the state.”

He said as he pre­pared to bow out of the coun­try’s lead­er­ship, he ac­cept­ed there would be mixed mem­o­ries of him.

“Some will re­mem­ber me for what they didn’t get and some will re­mem­ber me for what they achieved dur­ing my tenure and what I did to put them in a bet­ter po­si­tion.”

He added, “This coun­try has a good fu­ture and the whole ques­tion of lead­er­ship is some­thing that needs to be fair­ly as­sessed as part of the na­tion­al con­ver­sa­tion be­cause lead­er­ship is not easy. Any­body could fol­low and not even be no­ticed but once you are in a lead­er­ship po­si­tion, you be­come a tar­get for every­body, some for good, some for evil and if you are afraid of that, don’t ac­cept lead­er­ship. I have ac­cept­ed lead­er­ship and that is why I am not an­gry ex­cept with one per­son, who did one thing but every thing else I have no re­gret.”

Row­ley was al­so clear about his de­sire to en­sure a seam­less han­dover of lead­er­ship.

“What we are ex­pe­ri­enc­ing now is some­thing you haven’t ex­pe­ri­enced be­fore and some­thing ... peo­ple are try­ing to an­chor it in the Con­sti­tu­tion. I am en­sur­ing that the coun­try, as far as I am able to with­in the law of the coun­try and the PNM con­sti­tu­tion, I am try­ing to en­sure there is a smooth tran­si­tion, so that when I move out of this of­fice, that who­ev­er moves in, that the coun­try will not be dis­ad­van­taged and that it might even ben­e­fit and that is done with­in the Con­sti­tu­tion of the coun­try.”

Af­ter step­ping down as the coun­try’s leader on Sun­day, Row­ley will still serve as the PNM’s po­lit­i­cal leader. He said sim­i­lar pro­vi­sions will be made in­ter­nal­ly to en­sure par­ty op­er­a­tions are not ad­verse­ly af­fect­ed.

“When I move out as po­lit­i­cal leader, I don’t scat­ter the pearls. I en­sure that the PNM, if I am able to, is strength­ened and not weak­ened be­cause a strong PNM makes a strong Trinidad and To­ba­go,” he said.

While he did not say ex­act­ly when he will step down as par­ty leader, he as­sured there will be no clash­ing of heads with prime min­is­ter-elect Stu­art Young.

“I am not hold­ing on to any­thing, we are in tran­si­tion and that tran­si­tion is to en­sure that the PNM is not dis­ad­van­taged and the coun­try is not dis­ad­van­taged.”

Ad­dress­ing claims of a “dic­ta­tor-like ap­proach” in the ap­point­ment of Young as his suc­ces­sor, and that his ac­tion had placed par­ty mem­bers on edge and al­most caused an im­plo­sion with­in the PNM, Row­ley said, “If I am the on­ly dic­ta­tor that dic­tates by a se­cret bal­lot, then I could live with that. The se­lec­tion of a mem­ber of the par­lia­men­tary cau­cus to lead when I turned down the of­fer was done by se­cret bal­lot and you could jump high or you could dig low, that is a fact.

“It might have been the first time, it may not be the last time in the his­to­ry of this coun­try, but cer­tain­ly it was the first and for those who thought it was the on­ly way we could live is the way we lived like tod­dlers, when we are in fact geri­atrics, that is not log­ic. You are talk­ing about messy, have you seen a smoother trans­ac­tion?”

The PM pro­vid­ed fur­ther in­sight in­to why he did not step aside be­fore now al­though he had promised to do so be­fore.

“As the en­gaged Prime Min­is­ter in the mid­dle of the pan­dem­ic, I could not just walk away from the coun­try and sec­ond­ly, I had brought a lot of young peo­ple in­to pol­i­tics and in­to gov­ern­ment and I thought it was go­ing to be un­rea­son­able of me in 2020 to go off in my own com­forts and leave them in a pan­dem­ic and fight a gen­er­al elec­tion and on that ba­sis, to the sur­prise of my wife, I an­nounced I was con­tin­u­ing to con­test in 2020.”

The PM, who has served as the head of Gov­ern­ment since 2015, not­ed that while his ad­min­is­tra­tion has faced its fair share of crit­i­cism, the one in­ci­dent dur­ing his pe­ri­od in of­fice which drew his ire was when rape al­le­ga­tions were lev­elled against him and his fa­ther in Par­lia­ment by for­mer Peo­ple’s Part­ner­ship min­is­ter Ver­nel­la Al­leyne-Top­pin.

“If your con­duct is such that I don’t re­quire to re­spect you, I just wouldn’t dis­re­spect my­self. That Op­po­si­tion Leader, fac­ing a dif­fi­cult elec­tion with me as Op­po­si­tion Leader, you know what she did? She or­gan­ised for mem­bers of her Cab­i­net and Speak­er of the House to come to the Par­lia­ment and put on the Hansard that my fa­ther is a rapist and I am a rapist. That is on the Hansard, char­ac­ter mat­ters.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored