The Trinidad and To­ba­go De­fence Force (TTDF) says the High Court has dis­missed a claim brought by for­mer Se­nior Air­craft­man Kwame Joe­field, rul­ing that the de­ci­sion to dis­charge him was law­ful and pro­ce­du­ral­ly fair.

In a rul­ing de­liv­ered by Jus­tice West­min James, the court found that the TTDF act­ed with­in its ad­min­is­tra­tive dis­cre­tion and re­fused all ap­pli­ca­tions for re­in­state­ment, salary ar­rears, and dam­ages.

The TTDF said the court re­ject­ed Joe­field’s al­le­ga­tions of pro­ce­dur­al un­fair­ness, find­ing that he was giv­en mul­ti­ple op­por­tu­ni­ties to ad­dress his ser­vice record through a struc­tured, mul­ti-tiered re­view process.

The judg­ment con­firmed that Joe­field was ful­ly aware of the case against him and that of­fi­cials had in­formed him his sep­a­ra­tion was be­ing pur­sued due to un­sat­is­fac­to­ry per­for­mance. The court al­so held that fair­ness does not re­quire a for­mal oral hear­ing at every lev­el of the mil­i­tary hi­er­ar­chy.

The TTDF said the court found no breach of Joe­field’s con­sti­tu­tion­al right to equal­i­ty of treat­ment. Jus­tice James de­scribed the for­mer air­man’s ser­vice record as “unique­ly prob­lem­at­ic,” cit­ing a com­bi­na­tion of dis­ci­pli­nary con­vic­tions, ex­ces­sive sick leave av­er­ag­ing one day in ten, and poor per­for­mance ap­praisals while on pro­ba­tion.

The court ruled that Joe­field could not be com­pared to oth­er air­men who did not share this spe­cif­ic “tri­ad of de­fi­cien­cies”.

Ac­cord­ing to the TTDF, the rul­ing reaf­firms its au­thor­i­ty to man­age per­son­nel and main­tain stan­dards of dis­ci­pline, with the court un­der­scor­ing that it would not sub­sti­tute its judg­ment for that of com­pe­tent mil­i­tary au­thor­i­ties in as­sess­ing of­fi­cers un­der pro­ba­tion.

The TTDF said it re­mains com­mit­ted to up­hold­ing the rule of law and main­tain­ing the in­tegri­ty of its ad­min­is­tra­tive process­es.