JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 13, 2025

Minister orders audit of $60 million project

by

Akash Samaroo
14 days ago
20250628

UNC

The Min­is­ter of Pub­lic Ad­min­is­tra­tion and Ar­ti­fi­cial In­tel­li­gence, Do­minic Smith, is warn­ing the Op­po­si­tion that an in­de­pen­dent au­dit has been or­dered in­to what he de­scribed as a ques­tion­able project un­der the for­mer ad­min­is­tra­tion that was set to cost tax­pay­ers over USD 60 mil­lion.

Speak­ing late on Fri­day evening as the Sen­ate de­bat­ed the Fi­nance Bill 2025, Smith said he un­cov­ered a list of ex­pen­di­ture items that caused him great con­cern.

“One par­tic­u­lar project, Mr Pres­i­dent, was par­celled nice and neat as an up­grade un­der the Min­istry of Pub­lic Ad­min­is­tra­tion. I am told, Mr Pres­i­dent, that this project has been run­ning for over 24 years,” he told the Up­per House.

Smith con­tin­ued, “I am told that over the last ad­min­is­tra­tion, there was an up­grade. And that up­grade, Mr Pres­i­dent, would you be­lieve, would cost the tax­pay­ers over 60 mil­lion US dol­lars, Mr Pres­i­dent? Mr Pres­i­dent, I want you to jux­ta­pose that against the en­vi­ron­ment where forex is ap­par­ent­ly scarce.”

The rev­e­la­tion of the fi­nan­cial fig­ure drew nois­es of shock from his gov­ern­ment col­leagues.

Smith said he was flab­ber­gast­ed that the for­mer ad­min­is­tra­tion would en­gage in a project of this size and quan­tum.

“And when we dug fur­ther, Mr Pres­i­dent, would you be­lieve that this 60-plus-mil­lion US dol­lars was meant to be spent over a four-year pe­ri­od to end in 2026?” he added.

The Min­is­ter said in ad­di­tion to the hefty for­eign ex­change bill, the state faced a fur­ther in­voice.

“The Min­istry of Pub­lic Ad­min­is­tra­tion had be­gun and ini­ti­at­ed with a ven­dor, would you be­lieve that in ad­di­tion to that, the peo­ple of Trinidad and To­ba­go were al­so meant to pay 50 mil­lion TT dol­lars to op­er­a­tionalise?”

Smith said any gov­ern­ment that en­gages in such busi­ness does not tru­ly care about the wel­fare of its cit­i­zens.

He warned that this would be thor­ough­ly in­ves­ti­gat­ed.

“All I can say is that an au­dit is com­ing, and that au­dit, in­de­pen­dent of me and this gov­ern­ment, will re­veal all. All will be re­vealed, Mr Pres­i­dent, not by us, but by an in­de­pen­dent au­dit. And then, maybe col­leagues on the oth­er side will be sat­is­fied, be­cause they weren’t sat­is­fied enough pil­lag­ing the Trea­sury,” Smith de­clared.

A mem­ber of the Sen­ate on the op­po­site bench asked for fur­ther clar­i­ty on the project in ques­tion, but Min­is­ter Smith told them to di­rect those queries to for­mer Pub­lic Ad­min­is­tra­tion Min­is­ter Allyson West.

Guardian Me­dia at­tempt­ed to con­tact West but was un­suc­cess­ful. Like­wise, at­tempts to reach Min­is­ter Smith for fur­ther de­tails were un­suc­cess­ful.

To­wards the end of his con­tri­bu­tion, Smith was chal­lenged by In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor Dr De­sirée Mur­ray for “im­put­ing im­prop­er mo­tives”. Pri­or to this, Smith was chal­lenged twice by the same sen­a­tor for rel­e­vance dur­ing his con­tri­bu­tion.

In this in­stance, Sen­ate Pres­i­dent Wade Mark did not agree with Mur­ray’s ob­jec­tion.

“You see, im­put­ing im­prop­er mo­tives must be re­lat­ed to a mem­ber, a sit­ting mem­ber of the Sen­ate. If you are not a sit­ting mem­ber of the Sen­ate, you can speak to that is­sue, but you take re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for what you have said. So, when you talk about im­put­ing im­prop­er mo­tive, it must be ei­ther con­cern­ing a mem­ber of this cham­ber or a mem­ber of the oth­er cham­ber. Oth­er than that, you have ab­solute free­dom of speech in this House,” Mark ruled.

Smith, how­ev­er, said, “Mr Pres­i­dent, I must say, in the time that I’ve spent in this good Sen­ate, I’ve nev­er once had an in­de­pen­dent bencher in­ter­rupt so many times.”

Mark swift­ly stepped in to Mur­ray’s de­fence.

“Lis­ten, let us not go there. Any mem­ber, whether you are an op­po­si­tion mem­ber or an in­de­pen­dent mem­ber, has a right to in­voke stand­ing or­ders. So, let us not get in­volved in that kind of be­hav­iour. Please, every­one is en­ti­tled, in­clud­ing your good self, to raise a point of or­der. You do not iden­ti­fy a point of or­der by whether you are an op­po­si­tion mem­ber, an in­de­pen­dent mem­ber, or a gov­ern­ment mem­ber. So, don’t go there.”

Instagram


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored