KEVON FELMINE
Senior Reporter
kevon.felmine@guardian.co.tt
While the United National Congress (UNC) calls for independent international election observers for next month’s General Elections, the National Transformation Alliance (NTA) and HOPE believe Caricom’s presence will suffice.
Caricom has accepted T&T’s request for an observer mission in January.
However, United National Congress leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar, in a letter to Prime Minister Stuart Young, has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest. She cited the involvement of Caricom’s Assistant Secretary-General Elizabeth Solomon, who is married to former attorney general Reginald Armour.
Persad-Bissessar also expressed long-standing concerns about the Elections and Boundaries Commission (EBC).
NTA leader Gary Griffith supports external observers to ensure free and fair elections but believes Caricom’s mission is adequate.
“If we cannot trust our Caricom neighbours, then we should not be in Caricom,” Griffith told Guardian Media yesterday.
Griffith clarified that he never insisted on international observers. He questioned another political leader’s stance, asking how they could collaborate with Caricom if they became prime minister while simultaneously distrusting its election observers.
“One of these political leaders even called Caricom’s recent decision on gun violence a PR gimmick. But I am very comfortable with Caricom observers in Trinidad and Tobago. We have always had external support to ensure a free and transparent process, and I fully support that.”
Griffith dismissed the idea that international observers were necessary over Caricom’s, stating that nitpicking over observers was a waste of time. He argued, however, that their presence would deter baseless allegations from losing parties that could divide society and hinder national productivity.
Meanwhile, Hope chairman Steve Alvarez said his party had not yet discussed the issue but planned to meet tomorrow. But he affirmed HOPE’s confidence in the Elections and Boundaries Commission (EBC) and Caricom observers.
Conversely, the Congress of the People (COP), aligned with the UNC, insists on extra-regional observers. COP leader Prakash Ramadhar described the upcoming election as the most critical in the nation’s history, arguing that its outcome must be beyond reproach.
“It is crucial to have independent international observers, as we have had in the past, to ensure elections are conducted according to law and order. If any errors or misconduct occur, they will be reported,” Ramadhar said.
He referenced Guyana’s elections, noting, “Thank God there were international observers.”
Also contacted yesterday, political scientist Dr Maukesh Basdeo said international observers often serve as a certification of the election’s legitimacy.
“Caricom’s observers are welcomed, but having additional teams from outside Caricom strengthens the electoral process and reassures the international community that our elections uphold democratic principles. It enhances credibility,” Basdeo explained.
He recalled that Persad-Bissessar had previously called for independent observers during former prime minister Dr Keith Rowley’s tenure. Rowley agreed but restricted invitations to Caricom.
With the election date now confirmed, Basdeo said the question of extending invitations to other international bodies arises. He highlighted that the Organisation of American States (OAS), the Commonwealth Secretariat, and the Carter Center have all deployed observer teams to countries, including Venezuela and Guyana.
Political scientist Dr Bishnu Ragoonath suggested that the UNC’s demand for international observers was unlikely to significantly impact public perception or its campaign.
“The public sees this as a long-standing UNC position. They have been calling for international observers for years,” Ragoonath said.
He added that the UNC’s recent statements might invite greater scrutiny. When asked whether Caricom’s observers would be sufficient, he responded, “It would be more than what we had in 2020.”