Patriotic Front leader Mickela Panday has criticised Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s handling of questions surrounding US military strikes in the region, saying her responses show confusion, denial, and a lack of awareness about an international incident unfolding close to Trinidad and Tobago.
In a statement shared on social media yesterday, Panday said the situation has moved beyond politics and now raises concerns about whether the Prime Minister is misleading the public or is simply out of her depth.
She outlined the sequence of events, beginning with a September 2 US Navy airstrike on a Venezuelan vessel in the Caribbean that left 11 people dead.
She said international reports later revealed that two people survived the initial strike and that a second strike, described as a “double tap”, was allegedly ordered to kill them.
She added that The Washington Post and The New York Times both published investigations, and that global media placed T&T at the centre of the unfolding matter. The White House confirmed the second strike on December 1.
Panday said despite widespread international reporting, the Prime Minister appeared unaware of the issue when questioned by journalists on Monday.
She quoted Persad-Bissessar as responding, “I’m so sorry, on the what? The double-tap strike? I don’t know what that is.”
According to Panday, the Prime Minister later said she needed time to research the matter to avoid being “trapped into an answer.”
Panday stated that, following this research, Persad-Bissessar’s position remained troubling, as the Prime Minister admitted that the US does not share information with her and does not notify her about such strikes before, during, or after they occur.
Panday said this means the country could be facing significant international developments while its leader acknowledges she is “completely in the dark.”
She added that when Persad-Bissessar was asked whether she would make any inquiry into the alleged second strike, the Prime Minister responded, “Inquire from whom?”
Panday said such an answer raises serious concerns about the Prime Minister’s ability to safeguard national interests.
“Respectfully, a prime minister who doesn’t know who to ask, doesn’t know what happened, and doesn’t know how to get information is a prime minister who cannot protect a country,” she said.
