JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, June 14, 2025

PM Rowley labels ethics council ‘biased’

... Chairman Dr Ragoonath rubbishes claim

by

Jesse Ramdeo
687 days ago
20230728

jesse.ramdeo@cnc3.co.tt

Se­nior re­porter

The Coun­cil for Re­spon­si­ble Po­lit­i­cal Be­hav­iour has come in for strong crit­i­cism from Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley. In a Face­book post yes­ter­day, Dr Row­ley stat­ed, “An eth­i­cal coun­cil with­out ethics and steeped in bias is to be ig­nored for what it is.”

The coun­cil mon­i­tors and de­lib­er­ates on the con­duct of politi­cians which is then made pub­lic. It mon­i­tors me­dia re­ports and al­so in­vites the pub­lic to re­port any breach­es of the code of ethics.

The code of eth­i­cal con­duct, which was pre­pared by rep­re­sen­ta­tives of civ­il so­ci­ety in 2014, seeks to fos­ter democ­ra­cy, pro­mote re­spect for hu­man rights, en­cour­age par­tic­i­pa­tion in the elec­toral process, and pro­mote an elec­tion process free from vi­o­lence.

The Prime Min­is­ter was fir­ing back at the in­de­pen­dent or­gan­i­sa­tion fol­low­ing a re­cent rul­ing in which they found that the Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment (PNM) and its leader had breached the code of ethics. In fact, the PM had breached the code of ethics twice dur­ing cam­paign­ing for the Au­gust 14 Lo­cal Gov­ern­ment Elec­tions, the coun­cil not­ed.

Re­spond­ing to the PM, the chair­man of the coun­cil Dr Bish­nu Ra­goonath ques­tioned whether Dr Row­ley would have slammed the civ­il so­ci­ety group if it had found an op­pos­ing par­ty in breach of the code of ethics.

Speak­ing to Guardian Me­dia, Dr Ra­goonath said, “He could dis­miss it now say­ing the coun­cil is un­eth­i­cal and steeped in bias, that is his po­si­tion. Had we said some­thing about the UNC or the NTA we prob­a­bly would have got­ten ku­dos for it.”

Close sources told Guardian Me­dia that coun­cil mem­bers have re­ject­ed the Prime Min­is­ter’s state­ment and ex­pressed con­cern with what they la­belled as an at­tack on their in­tegri­ty.

Sources in­di­cat­ed that the coun­cil mem­bers main­tained that they ex­e­cute their role and func­tion “dili­gent­ly and with­out bias”.

The coun­cil in­cludes Dr Ra­goonath as chair­man, Ralph Pe­ter as deputy chair­man, Leela Ramdeen as sec­re­tary, Dr East­lyn Mcken­zie, Dr Olabisi Kuboni, Dr Gabrielle Ho­sein, Dr Bev­er­ly Ann-Marie Beck­les and Prof Carlisle Pem­ber­ton.

Dr Ra­goonath stat­ed that one of the coun­cil’s mem­bers, Imam Im­ti­az Ali died on Wednes­day.

Ac­cord­ing to Dr Ra­goonath, he was an­tic­i­pat­ing the back­lash from the Prime Min­is­ter.

“This is not an un­ex­pect­ed out­come fol­low­ing the coun­cil’s find­ings based on their de­lib­er­a­tions over the last few weeks,” Dr Ra­goonath said, main­tain­ing the coun­cil’s im­par­tial­i­ty.

Ac­cord­ing to Dr Ra­goonath, Dr Row­ley’s po­si­tion on the coun­cil seemed to be an about-turn from when it was formed in 2014.

“Kei­th Row­ley and Franklin Khan were the first two peo­ple to sign on to the code, they were in op­po­si­tion then,” he said.

Guardian Me­dia at­tempt­ed to con­tact Dr Row­ley to de­ter­mine whether or not he will move to with­draw the PNM from the Code of Eth­i­cal Po­lit­i­cal Con­duct, how­ev­er, there was no re­sponse.

The PM, PNM’s breach­es

The coun­cil met on Mon­day and con­sid­ered two com­plaints that were sub­mit­ted by the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) against Dr Row­ley and the PNM.

It said the first com­plaint re­lat­ed to the lan­guage used by Dr Row­ley on the PNM plat­form at a meet­ing in San Fer­nan­do on Ju­ly 15.

The coun­cil stat­ed that in the Ju­ly 15 in­ci­dent, “The UNC claimed that Dr Row­ley’s state­ments were based on a false and un­sub­stan­ti­at­ed al­le­ga­tion which was in­flam­ma­to­ry, di­vi­sive, and had the po­ten­tial of in­cit­ing vi­o­lence.”

The coun­cil said Dr Row­ley did not name any par­ty or per­son, but based on the pol­i­cy pro­pos­al be­ing dis­cussed, it was clear that ref­er­ence was be­ing made to the UNC and its fe­male leader.

“In mak­ing the said crit­i­cisms of poli­cies as ad­vo­cat­ed by the UNC, Dr Row­ley went on to al­lude to events which have not been linked to the UNC, and, as such, those state­ments can be deemed to be un­sub­stan­ti­at­ed al­le­ga­tions, and this is in breach of the code,” it said.

It said con­tin­u­ing this part of his speech, Dr Row­ley, again with­out call­ing any name, but still re­fer­ring to the pol­i­cy pro­posed by the UNC, spoke in deroga­to­ry terms of a po­lit­i­cal leader.

“This is un­ac­cept­able and to that end, he is in clear breach of the clause of the code which reads: Not make false or defam­a­to­ry al­le­ga­tions in print or speech in con­nec­tion with an elec­tion in re­spect of a par­ty, its can­di­dates, rep­re­sen­ta­tives or mem­bers,” it said.

The coun­cil had re­ceived a pre­vi­ous com­plaint on the PM and af­ter de­lib­er­at­ing found that Dr Row­ley used lan­guage that was in­sen­si­tive and in­ap­pro­pri­ate dur­ing a cam­paign meet­ing in St James.

Na­tion­al Trans­for­ma­tion Al­liance leader Gary Grif­fith had re­port­ed the Ju­ly 7 in­ci­dent in­volv­ing Row­ley to the coun­cil.

Grif­fith wrote the coun­cil point­ing out DR Row­ley’s al­leged re­marks at the meet­ing: “They are go­ing to give a cer­tain race gun (sic) to shoot peo­ple of an­oth­er race be­cause they are say­ing that the crime in this coun­try which we know is across the board, is one race at­tack­ing an­oth­er.”

Grif­fith said the al­leged re­marks were “both alarm­ing and con­cern­ing as such an of­fen­sive ut­ter­ance has the po­ten­tial to cause ir­repara­ble con­se­quences”.

Af­ter re­view­ing the speech made by the Prime Min­is­ter in St James, the coun­cil said it found “the lan­guage used was clear­ly in­ap­pro­pri­ate and in­sen­si­tive”.

Mean­while, in the sec­ond com­plaint from the coun­cil of the PNM, ref­er­ence was made to the ad­ver­tis­ing fly­ers of two of its can­di­dates in the Ma­yaro/Rio Claro Re­gion­al Cor­po­ra­tion.

The com­plaint by the UNC is that these PNM can­di­dates are ad­ver­tis­ing them­selves as hav­ing the abil­i­ty to as­sist or fa­cil­i­tate ac­cess to state-con­trolled grants.

“Two fly­ers were sup­plied to the coun­cil, and while one speaks to ‘of­fer­ing as­sis­tance to the pub­lic’, the oth­er is more bold and trou­bling since, un­der the can­di­date’s name, it sim­ply states “Ap­ply Now–Grants avail­able.”

The coun­cil said that the fly­er goes on to list items such as ‘food card,’ ‘house wiring,’ ‘HDC hous­ing,’ ‘pub­lic as­sis­tance, and many more’ and al­so gives con­tact in­for­ma­tion.

“The coun­cil in­ves­ti­gat­ing the au­then­tic­i­ty of this fly­er was ad­vised to vis­it the cam­paign of­fice of the can­di­date to fol­low up, there­by fur­ther giv­ing the im­pres­sion that one can ap­ply and be af­ford­ed grants from a PNM cam­paign of­fice.”

With the PNM hold­ing the Cen­tral Gov­ern­ment, the coun­cil stat­ed, these ad­ver­tise­ments give the im­pres­sion that state re­sources are be­ing chan­nelled through the cam­paign of­fices of PNM can­di­dates.

Based on the com­plaints, the coun­cil called once again on Dr Row­ley to be mind­ful of the use of lan­guage in the cam­paign and to “en­sure that its can­di­dates de­sist from giv­ing the im­pres­sion that grants can be on of­fer as in­duce­ments, par­tic­u­lar­ly so when such will utilise state re­sources”.

Yes­ter­day Dr Ra­goonath said, “All the mem­bers sat on the coun­cil and came up with the de­ci­sion on Mon­day and came up with what we sub­mit­ted on Tues­day.”

About the coun­cil

Dr Ra­goonath said that the coun­cil was drawn up by mem­bers of civ­il so­ci­ety and is not an arm of the State. He not­ed that while it has no au­thor­i­ty to is­sue pun­ish­ment, mem­bers of the pub­lic are even­tu­al­ly the fi­nal judge.

Among the 20 pro­hib­it­ed con­duct po­lit­i­cal par­ties, coali­tions and their sup­port­ers must ad­here to in­clude; No dis­crim­i­na­tion on the grounds of race, eth­nic­i­ty, sex, gen­der, class, re­li­gion or be­lief, or seek to mo­bilise sup­port by ref­er­ence to race, sex, gen­der, re­li­gion or class, no use lan­guage or act in a way that may pro­voke vi­o­lence; or in­tim­i­date can­di­dates, mem­bers of par­ties, rep­re­sen­ta­tives or sup­port­ers of par­ties or can­di­dates, or vot­ers; or in­vite, en­cour­age or fos­ter ha­tred, re­sent­ment or any form of vi­o­lence as well as not seek to as­sas­si­nate the char­ac­ter of or make defam­a­to­ry com­ments about any in­di­vid­ual, fam­i­ly, pro­fes­sion­al group or sec­tion of the com­mu­ni­ty.

The code of ethics was drawn up by var­i­ous or­gan­i­sa­tions rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the so­ci­ety.

Ac­cord­ing to in­for­ma­tion ob­tained from the or­gan­i­sa­tion’s web­site, the An­gli­can Church, An­ju­man Sun­nat-ul-Ja­maat As­so­ci­a­tion, Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Work­ers’ Union/FI­TUN, In­ter-Re­li­gious Or­gan­i­sa­tion of T&T, Methodist Church, Net­work of NGOs, Pres­by­ter­ian Church, Ro­man Catholic Arch­dio­cese of Port-of-Spain, Sanatan Dhar­ma Ma­ha Sab­ha, T&T Cham­ber of In­dus­try and Com­merce, T&T Pub­lish­ers & Broad­cast­ers As­so­ci­a­tion, T&T Trans­paren­cy In­sti­tute are sig­na­to­ries to the code.

The coun­cil said that as of Oc­to­ber 2021, 17 po­lit­i­cal par­ties are cur­rent­ly signed on to the code of ethics.

Kam­la: Un­fair at­tack

Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar told Guardian Me­dia yes­ter­day that the Prime Min­is­ter’s po­si­tion on the coun­cil was not new as he kept in the pat­tern of blam­ing oth­ers and not tak­ing ac­count­abil­i­ty for his ac­tions. She stat­ed, “The coun­cil is do­ing the job they think they set them­selves up to do. If they have giv­en a rul­ing that he dis­agrees with, I think it is un­fair to be at­tack­ing them in that man­ner be­cause the rul­ing did not go in his favour.”

Grif­fith: Row­ley’s job is to di­vide and con­quer

Po­lit­i­cal Leader of the Na­tion­al Trans­for­ma­tion Al­liance Gary Grif­fith, mean­while, said the Prime Min­is­ter’s con­dem­na­tion of the Coun­cil for Re­spon­si­ble Po­lit­i­cal Be­hav­iour was undiplo­mat­ic.

“You feel it is ac­cept­able to state that a po­lit­i­cal leader is a crim­i­nal, you feel it is ac­cept­able to make com­ments that can di­vide a coun­try, you feel it is ac­cept­able to lie and say firearms are be­ing giv­en to one race to be able to at­tack an­oth­er.

“It shows the stan­dard of Kei­th Row­ley, he does not know what it means to be a states­man or Prime Min­is­ter to unite a coun­try. His job will al­ways be to di­vide and con­quer, not this time.”

Politics


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored