JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, May 24, 2025

Privy Council rules in favour of local RC Church in land dispute

by

Derek Achong
15 days ago
20250509
The Privy Council building in London, England.

The Privy Council building in London, England.

[Image courtesy the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]

The Ro­man Catholic Church has emerged vic­to­ri­ous in a lengthy le­gal bat­tle with a fam­i­ly over con­trol of a prop­er­ty on Monos Is­land used for its sea scout­ing ac­tiv­i­ties.

De­liv­er­ing a de­ci­sion, late last month, three Law Lords of the Unit­ed King­dom-based Privy Coun­cil re­fused sib­lings Martha and Dean Joseph leave to pur­sue a fi­nal ap­peal in their law­suit against the Ro­man Catholic Arch­bish­op of Port-of-Spain.

In their failed ap­peal, the sib­lings were claim­ing that High Court Judge Eleanor Don­ald­son-Hon­ey­well and three Court of Ap­peal Judges got it wrong when they dis­missed their case and up­held the RC Church’s claim to the prop­er­ty.

The dis­pute re­lat­ed to a one-acre par­cel of land on the is­land, off the coast of Ch­aguara­mas, known as “Cop­per­hole”.

The prop­er­ty got its un­of­fi­cial name as in the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry, it was used by whalers as a lo­ca­tion to melt whale blub­ber in large cop­per pots.

It was part of the Unit­ed States Navy base dur­ing World War II. It was even­tu­al­ly re­turned to T&T in 1969 and was sub­se­quent­ly vest­ed in the Ch­aguara­mas De­vel­op­ment Au­thor­i­ty(CDA).

The church and the fam­i­ly both utilised the prop­er­ty and co-ex­ist­ed for decades be­fore the sib­lings’ now de­ceased fa­ther blocked the church from ac­cess­ing the prop­er­ty in 2004, lead­ing to the law­suit.

The church claimed that it be­gan us­ing the prop­er­ty for sea scout­ing ac­tiv­i­ties in the 1950s with the per­mis­sion of US mil­i­tary of­fi­cials. It al­so claimed that it had an ap­pli­ca­tion with the CDA to for­malise its oc­cu­pa­tion that has been pend­ing since 1996.

The church al­so claimed that the sib­lings’ fa­ther was the care­tak­er of the prop­er­ty.

The Josephs de­nied the church’s claims as they con­tend­ed that their fam­i­ly be­gan oc­cu­py­ing the prop­er­ty in 1955 when their grand­fa­ther built a hut on it.

They claimed that their fam­i­ly con­struct­ed an an­nexe to the build­ing utilised by the church, and lived there for decades.

In 2009, the struc­ture oc­cu­pied by both par­ties was burnt to the ground. A small gal­vanised build­ing at the edge of the prop­er­ty, used by Dean as a boat house, was not razed in the fire.

In de­cid­ing the case in 2018, Jus­tice Don­ald­son-Hon­ey­well up­held the church’s in­ter­est in the land.

De­liv­er­ing a judg­ment in Ju­ly, last year, Ap­pel­late Judges Prakash Moo­sai, Vasheist Kokaram, and Car­la Brown-An­toine dis­missed an ap­peal from the sib­lings.

The ap­peal pan­el found that, based on the ev­i­dence, the judge was cor­rect to rule that the Josephs did not ad­verse­ly pos­sess the land.

“The tri­al judge there­fore has not been shown to be plain­ly wrong in ar­riv­ing at her de­c­la­ra­tions of pos­ses­sion at Cop­per­hole,” Jus­tice Kokaram said.

“While usu­al­ly all that is suf­fi­cient is that the Josephs prove they have been liv­ing there, in these unique cir­cum­stances, it is plau­si­ble they were there through the oc­cu­pa­tion of Kha­ki and they were un­cer­tain as to whether his oc­cu­pa­tion was at the be­hest of the RC Church,” he added.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored