JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, August 14, 2025

Young skips pension bill debate

by

GUARDIAN MEDIA NEWSROOM
48 days ago
20250627
FLASHBACK – Former prime minister Stuart Young, SC, MP, the Member of Parliament for Port of Spain North/ St. Ann's West, contributing to the debate on a Motion to Adopt the Report of the Standing Finance Committee, on June 18, 2025. [Image courtesy Parliament of Trinidad and Tobago via Facebook]

FLASHBACK – Former prime minister Stuart Young, SC, MP, the Member of Parliament for Port of Spain North/ St. Ann's West, contributing to the debate on a Motion to Adopt the Report of the Standing Finance Committee, on June 18, 2025. [Image courtesy Parliament of Trinidad and Tobago via Facebook]

Parliament of Trinidad and Tobago

For­mer Prime Min­is­ter Stu­art Young says he will not at­tend to­day's de­bate on the Prime Min­is­ter’s Pen­sion (Amend­ment) Bill, call­ing it un­con­sti­tu­tion­al and per­son­al­ly tar­get­ed.

To­day the Low­er House will meet to de­bate the bill, which seeks to tight­en the rules around pen­sion el­i­gi­bil­i­ty for for­mer prime min­is­ters. Un­der the ex­ist­ing law, any­one who has ever held the post qual­i­fies for a pen­sion, re­gard­less of how long they served. The new leg­is­la­tion in­tro­duces a min­i­mum one-year re­quire­ment and a tiered pen­sion struc­ture, with pay­outs rang­ing from one-third to full salary af­ter four years in of­fice.

If passed, the changes will ap­ply retroac­tive­ly from March 10 this year. Be­cause it af­fects con­sti­tu­tion­al rights, the bill re­quires a three-fifths spe­cial ma­jor­i­ty.

Young, who served briefly as prime min­is­ter be­fore the April gen­er­al elec­tion, de­scribed the bill as “ad hominem” and said its retroac­tive clause was a clear abuse of the Con­sti­tu­tion.

“As a mat­ter of prin­ci­ple, I should not par­tic­i­pate in or be present for the par­lia­men­tary de­bate of this bill,” he said.

He added he would con­tin­ue to serve the coun­try “with­out fear or favour, mal­ice or ill will.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored