Professor Hamid Ghany
The Guardian editorial on May 5th, 2009 said: “Maurice Bishop became himself the victim of the repressive system he had run: his colleagues put him under house arrest. A crowd of his supporters eventually freed the embattled prime minister, and marched with him to the hilltop fort, where his rivals were entrenched. Hell literally broke loose. The People’s Revolutionary Army turned its guns on the people, and rival revolutionary leaders seized and executed Bishop and his closest allies. As Grenada plunged into terror and ruin, US and Caribbean (but not T&T) troops invaded. In short order, every official, physical, and organisational structure standing in the name of revolution was dismantled. The killers of Bishop were arrested, tried and eventually condemned. A Caribbean experiment in revolution failed spectacularly. The experience, however, confirmed the necessity, regardless of prevailing political ambitions, of preserving and extending rights and freedoms.”
The rejection of Cuban influence in Grenada split Caricom in 1983 between the socialist sympathisers (Burnham, Chambers, et al.) and the capitalist supporters (Adams, Seaga and Charles).
During his political life, Dr Eric Williams was never a socialist sympathiser. He dismissed the Non-Aligned Movement and did not attend its 1973 conference. In his resignation speech to the PNM’s 15th Annual Convention on September 28th, 1973, he said: “I have never attended any of the non-aligned conferences. On this occasion President Boumedienne of Algeria sent a special emissary to me inviting me to attend. I intimated to the emissary that, if I did attend, I would be forced to raise a particular issue on which I felt most strongly, and what I would have to say on the subject would break up the Conference. I told him what I would say. He was most unhappy, and indicated he would report it to President Boumedienne, to whom I merely wrote subsequently excusing my absence on the ground of heavy domestic commitments.” (PNM 15th Annual Convention, Address by the Political Leader, p. 33).
Williams refused to accompany Fidel Castro, Michael Manley and Forbes Burnham, who all came to Trinidad, to travel to this conference on September 5th, hoping Williams would have joined them. He did not. In his 1973 resignation speech, he said:
“I then heard for the first time of the arrangements for the Caribbean Prime Ministers to rendezvous at Piarco and travel to Algiers in the large Russian jet. The special emissary expressed surprise that we had not heard of either his visit or the travel plans; he indicated that another Government was supposed to advise us on this. By the time all this emerged, our delegation to Algiers had been announced; neither the Prime Minister nor any Minister would be going.” (p. 28).
Two years later, Williams refused Cuba’s request to land aircraft at Piarco for refuelling in sending troops to fight in the Angolan civil war. He interrupted the 1975 budget debate to make the following statement:
“Mr Speaker, I am most grateful to you for the opportunity you have now given me here to make a statement of urgent public importance on behalf of the Cabinet, which has just held private consultations among members present and has had telephone confirmation from the members who, for one reason or another, are not here today. The statement is as follows. A request has been made by the Cuban Government through its civil aviation authorities to the Director of Civil Aviation in Trinidad and Tobago seeking permission to land Cuban Army planes at Piarco for refuelling. These planes will be transporting Cuban troops to Angola. Cabinet has refused the request of the Cuban Government and has made it clear that Trinidad and Tobago will not, under any circumstances, either intervene in Angola’s affairs or contribute, however indirectly, to the intervention of any other country. The Cabinet’s decision has been passed to the Director of Civil Aviation for transmission to the Cuban Government.” (Hansard, House of Representatives, 18th December, 1975, pp. 295–296).
Williams was determined to block the Cuban government’s efforts in the Angolan civil war. Notably, his rationale for opening diplomatic relations with Cuba in 1972 was couched in the following way in his resignation speech:
“Some have opposed our new relations on the ground that Cuba is a Communist country. But if that didn’t prevent President Nixon from initiating new arrangements with Communist China, why should it prevent us from bringing Cuba into a regional trade arrangement?” (p.27).
Williams only recognised Cuba on tit-for-tat terms by using the USA as the barometer. The PNM outlook has now become left-wing when compared to its founder. Last Wednesday’s UN vote by T&T resembled Williams’ blast from the past by recognising Cuba diplomatically, while rejecting their ideology.
Professor Hamid Ghany is Professor of Constitutional Affairs and Parliamentary Studies at the University of the West Indies (UWI). He was also appointed an Honorary Professor of The UWI upon his retirement in October 2021. He continues his research and publications and also does some teaching at The UWI. He was selected by the THA to guide the discussions on Tobago autonomy.
