This Friday, April 7, the World Health Organization (WHO) marks its 75th anniversary with the theme #Healthforall. The celebration is billed as “an opportunity to look back at public health successes that have improved quality of life during the last seven decades.”
It is good and right that we acknowledge there is much to celebrate globally due to this 1948 commitment by countries worldwide.
The history of that day credits representatives of Brazil and China for proposing that the world needed an embracing organisation to deal with health at the international level.
So, in San Francisco, California, USA, in 1945, while the conference was being held to set up the United Nations, another conference was proposed for establishing what we now know as the WHO. (https://www.who.int/about/history)
The historical recounting says this all happened 100 years after international public health was birthed at the Paris International Sanitary Conference in 1851, an event prompted by the precipitated spread of cholera over a prior 20-year period.
In 1948, the goal of the WHO was stated as “to promote health, keep the world safe and serve the vulnerable—so everyone, everywhere can attain the highest level of health and well-being,” Health equity, which we struggle to attain, is foundational to the thrust!
Successes and benefits in things we take for granted, which keep our world healthier and safer, such as eradication of infectious diseases like polio and smallpox, immunisation, antibiotics, as examples, and the whole reshaping of healthcare delivery into the “health for all” motif, setting the stage for universal health coverage, and more, came through the organisation of health under the WHO.
In 1978, at Alma Ata, in Kazakhstan, the goal of health (for all) that “all people everywhere have the right to achieve the highest attainable level of health” reshaped the delivery of care, making this the underlying principle of primary health care.
Primary healthcare was refocused as the people-centred delivery of services to meet people’s needs throughout their lives while respecting their choices.
As a public health practitioner, looking back at the history of the WHO, reading its 10-year accounts for the past seven decades, and browsing the timeline of achievements, give me hope for health, equality in health, and health equity. My more precise interest, of course, was to look at the historical perspectives on mental health. In the online document accounting for the WHO’s first ten years though, the subject of mental health is listed on page 324, but the document ends at page 282, omitting many other subject areas of interest such as nutrition, addiction, maternal and child health, and more. The next account, 1958-1967, the second ten-year period, gave insight into how the progress and future of mental health was perceived.
It reads in part: “The modern trend is away from custodial care in an institution and towards active treatment, with the aim of returning the patient as soon as possible to the highest achievable degree of normal life in the community.”
My reflection here is that this “modern trend” of the late 1950s and 1960s is still not trending sufficiently in 2023. Back then, the WHO recorded the approach of psychiatry as “changing, with emphasis on social psychiatry and community care, through expansion of outpatient services, day care hospitals, domiciliary care and follow-up services.”
WHO’s work in this field, it stated, “has been increasingly concerned with the development of mental health services as part of the public health structure, including the integration of mental health care programmes in the local health services.”
These aspirations included such things as undergraduate teaching of psychiatry and mental health promotion in all medical curricula (1960), recommendations for “the inclusion of mental health in the curricula of all public health training centres and in post-graduate training for general practitioners” (1961).
With a recorded birth date of 1962, as I continue to peruse these documents on health from 1948 and specifically for mental health, I have mixed emotions.
Mainly, about how the continued levels of stigma and social exclusion born out of misunderstanding and cruel judgment, and embedded in systemic malfunctions, continue to propagate discrimination in the entire arena/field of mental health.
All of the good intentions are recorded, but somehow the investment and investiture in the health of the mind remains imbalanced against what we see as the continued progress and evolution of the myriad issues of “physical” and occupational/environmental health.
Stigma against mental illnesses by society (public stigma), at the institutional levels (global, national), professional, and individual levels continue to retard the rate of progress that the world needs and deserves.
That declared, today I congratulate the WHO for its 75 years of leading and improving public health. The COVID-19 pandemic may have brought the most attention globally in recent times to the intentional good and commendable work of this organisation.
For the history of the WHO by decades: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241560146