Last Friday, I sat all morning during the 9/11 memorial in New York, carried live on television. I have done this almost every year for the past 25 years, and on those few occasions where I could not view the live ceremony, I looked at the recording later in the day. This time, I stood for all seven moments of silence given as tribute. For the first six honouring the main events of that day, which took the lives of almost 3,000 people, and the newest moment. The latter honours 9,000 first responders, recovery workers and residents who died from toxic dust and 9/11-related illnesses since.
As I watched the tributes at the reading of the names, tears were my only companion. My heart was so heavy to see the descendants of those killed, especially those born after 2001 who only have photos and the stories told. People’s repressed hurt was evident, too.
Years ago, I would have considered myself sappy for having such deep emotions for strangers who appear fleetingly on my screen. But in those 25 years since, I have had the opportunity to explore trauma.
Vicarious traumatisation is real. It is an indirect stress reaction that occurs when you absorb the pain, suffering, or traumatic experiences of others. Even though you are aware that you are not or did not have the traumatic experience, your body still experiences the emotional, physical and cognitive effects as though you were present (https://health.clevelandclinic.org/vicarious-trauma).
My pain comes from a vivid memory of the events in my living room, watching the day unfold. I have remained compelled by the multiple layers of suffering and drama, constantly returning to survivors’ stories and consuming 9/11 media over the years.
In September 2001, I was close to my 39th birthday and had already experienced more trauma than anyone should in a lifetime. By then I realised that trauma layers itself on trauma, sitting on the psyche, distorting everything in one’s mind and life, making all relations difficult, especially without having an intervention.
My life has been in constant intervention for decades now, committed to restoring or repairing what broke in me and shifted the trajectory of my life. There is a need to heal; to build newer, healthier, more hopeful and healthful experiences for myself and those with whom I have relationships. It’s been tough work, but I celebrate the progress.
This 2026 observance, though, was layered on the grief of a recent video circulating showing a man at his dad’s funeral service in complete distress from the abuse he claimed he suffered and accusing a relative of denial or pretence about the suffering.
I recoiled.
Funerals are billed “in loving memory of” the deceased. My guess is that on most occasions, the funeral planner is celebrating their experience/memory or observing the espoused decorum of not speaking ill of the dead.
I am always talking about how much we lie at funeral services. My strong opposition to eulogies that scrape up a funny story or talk about what people liked to eat or recount something to humanise the dead beyond the truth of their life is known.
This man’s trauma resonated. More than that, I was triggered.
When I was sufficiently able to process a sexual infraction in my earlier life, I became very angry and had many thoughts of confronting the perpetrator. The anger boiled over when he died suddenly, thwarting my plan. I called this older cousin uncle. As a much younger cousin, saying aunty or uncle was practising “respect,” but respect had not been accorded to me, though, a mere child.
I recalled preparing for his funeral armed with a secret plan to display my anger and hurt at his graveside. In my distress, I shared with a friend who was fully empathetic but gently dissuaded me.
That friend came to my house the night before the funeral to comfort me, but I think it was more to help avoid a possible incarceration if I carried out my plan. That trauma was among the early life infractions that had already “gifted” me a psychiatric hospitalisation in my mid-teens.
We must be more honest about the abuses we suffer. When we headline with “loving memory,” we should be willing and wise to recognise that “loving” experience is not the only one. Sometimes, it is the furthest from the truth of the dead person’s life, as the hurting man contended.
“Yuh lie. Yuh lie... He was not perfect. He beat all ah we... he beat me so bad. He abuse me. He abuse me,” he wailed uncontrollably, expressing his pain with overwhelming clarity.
I wanted to hold his head in my bosom and console him.
So many families’ stories are exemplified in this unfortunate occurrence. And the worst part of this for me was the lack of compassion or sensitivity from the officiant who tried unsuccessfully to rope the suffering into his sermon, clueless about an appropriate response to the outburst.
I entreat us: deal with trauma in the living years. Have courage to confront the demons and give grief a healthy exposure, or it will expose itself.
