As I watched for the fourth straight year – 2023, 2024, 2025 and now 2026 – contests in Carnival judged by people, I recall always why I love sports more than arts because unless the referee or umpire has a stinker or two, normally those on the sporting field find a way to conjure up a result that at least suggests fair play and a general reward for endeavour, with more often than not absolute and unwavering skill coming to the forefront in most results. The following quotes are important for life lessons at Carnival time, I believe.
“Competitions are decided by people, and people bring their preferences with them.”
— Simon Cowell
“Judging talent is never neutral. It reflects the judge as much as the performer.”
— Howard Gardner
“In any contest judged by humans, fairness is filtered through opinion.”
— Stephen Jay Gould
Everyone knows that the one sport that has led to the most despicable results in terms of honesty and accountability is boxing. Sadly, it is almost as if boxing attracts the wrong persons who make the decisions, and several boxers are given questionable decisions. So, when I hear persons mention boxing results in the same breath as our Carnival competitions, I am disturbed.
“The entire sport is set up to allow these blind spots for corruption. Everything about boxing is designed to ensure the crème de la corruption rises to the top." — G Morgan
So, as I observe the week ahead, in Carnival competitions terms, I check myself to compare some of these events and the possible judging formats to sporting events and whether they would ever make the grade, and if so, what grading they would receive.
If we start with the Road March competition, it is based on actual results apparently, although the veracity of the reporting on how many times a particular song is played or where it is played on the stage, on the side of the stage, or which section of the band plays the sound, and if there are 20 sections, one vote for each section, can leave more questions than answers, and I doubt any professional athlete and his coaching team would ever agree to what appears to be a haphazard at best judging system in this current format.
Let us now discuss the controversial topic of the King and Queen of Carnival and the buildup to the final night at Dimanche Gras on Carnival Sunday. I have to openly admit some self-interest, as one of my family members is involved, so I follow out of both interest and curiosity, along with my cerebral thinking and sagacious processing. I can report that this year, like recent years, has been disappointing in terms of new ideas and thinking. At one stage, while I looked out into the vast Queens Park Savannah backstage area, all the costumes looked alike – just different versions of big floats on large or extra-large wheels, some being rolled or pushed towards the starting line by persons not participating so as to wisely reserve the contestant’s energy for a 3-minute slot on stage.
I am certain that Wayne Berkeley and others of that artistic mind must be rolling in their graves at these “Floats”. Year in, year out, it is all a variation of the same themes and different colours, and the creativity has disappeared, but I cannot blame the participants, as this is clearly what the judges want. There is no imagination; the creative juice has dried up in over 90 percent of the “outfits”.
I was told that the judges may not be able to interpret anything better, perhaps given their limitations, and I would hope that this is merely “old talk”; otherwise, the current President of the Carnival Bands Association, Mark Ayen, who is no stranger to this environment, needs to examine his team and the legacy they are leaving.
Does anyone in this competition believe that any of these winners would ever receive calls from international organisations like the Olympics to come be part of the occasion, as Peter Minshall has achieved? The answer is unequivocally No and yes, Minshall is an exceptional artist and designer, but I just sense that the current vacuous nature of judging will rub young talent with ideas and innovation away, far away.
However, I will leave the rest for those who care about this industry to sort out before it is too late, as can be witnessed by the gradually reducing crowd attendances every year.
Instead, I want to focus on a disturbing trend I have noticed within recent years in terms of scorecards. Let me say first, there is NO SPORT where it is stated that a participant is not allowed to review and walk away with his scoresheet so he and his team can improve by finding out where they went wrong and what needs to be corrected, particularly where you have paid an entrance fee as well. In all areas of competition there can be only one winner, but there are also several persons who seek to get better and improve, so the scoresheet is critical.
If, as I have been told, in the 2026 version of the King and Queens Preliminary contests, only the top 20 scores were provided to the media, and those who placed from 21 to 47 or 48 had no idea of their marks and were not being allowed to get a scoresheet but could come and watch their marks but not record or photograph them, then that is not only undemocratic and against natural rights and fairness but also suggests a lack of accountability and transparency. If that is so, then I hope the National Carnival Commission (NCC) would seek clarity and address these matters, as I believe it is the NCC that funds these various hybrid bodies in the Carnival disposition. I hope that Mark Ayen would address this in the full disclosure it needs to be; otherwise, his legacy and his reign may be tarnished by these claims.
As for the Calypso finals also on Carnival Sunday, I hope that again, while we never all agree on the winner, all the relevant judging scorecards are open and made available. I would also suggest there is a time for new judging personnel; just as football referees, no matter how good they are, have to retire by a certain age, generally around 45, there should be some criteria and benchmarks, as we are in an evolving world.
So again, as I have stated, if all of these carnival competitions were sporting events, there are a lot of things that have to be corrected to meet international playing conditions standards.
Last but not least, I must address the situation with Panorama and the Pan Finals. As a mere curious observer, it appears when it comes to this particular competition that the judges never change from preliminaries to semifinals to finals, as the steelband that leads from the first stage normally wins, which suggests many circumstances.
1) Judges are too lazy to change.
2) There is no improvement from round to round by the various bands.
3) No rotation of judges
The problem for me, just as with the King and Queen of Carnival and this competition, is that there is too much left to interpretation and preference. Whereas with the calypso contest, we can all witness and detect poor melody, missed lines and just poor overall performance and presentation.
All of this must cause serious concern for the NCC, which, under the astute and progressive Ministry of Culture and Community Development, has set about to ensure a lot more persons are facilitated this Carnival with free and quality artistes at their disposal. But just as SportTT has to overlook errant sporting organisations, I believe similarly the Ministry of Culture and Community Development will need to revise some of these organisations that get funding where there are questions over processes and ultimately the funding and judging. It is not going to be easy, but certain change is needed unless we all desire the art form that is carnival to be eroded.
So I hope that the forward thinking of the Ministry of Culture and Community Development under Minister Michele Benjamin and her team is allowed to flourish and grow, as we need modern thoughts which I hope will materialise in sports soon.
