JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 8, 2025

Valuable look at Indo-Caribbean culture

by

20151019

In­dia in Caribbean (sub­ti­tled So­cio-Cul­tur­al Moor­ings of Di­as­po­ra), a col­lec­tion of es­says pro­duced at the be­hest of Gau­ri Shankar Gup­tar, the In­di­an High Com­mis­sion­er to T&T, is a most in­trigu­ing and valu­able mis­cel­lany.

It con­sists of 24 ar­ti­cles, rang­ing in style and con­tent from jour­nal­ism to aca­d­e­m­ic es­says, to a few pieces in-be­tween, and re­flec­tions and brief in­ter­po­la­tions from a va­ri­ety of peo­ple on the In­di­an ex­pe­ri­ence, main­ly in Trinidad, but al­so in re­gion.

Un­usu­al­ly for a col­lec­tion of this na­ture, the work is not uni­fied the­mat­i­cal­ly, or rec­on­ciled by an ed­i­tor's in­tro­duc­tion. The points of view and top­ics in var­i­ous ar­ti­cles di­verge and dis­agree, which is not a bad thing or even anom­alous for such books, but one ex­pects an ed­i­to­r­i­al co­her­ence of per­spec­tive even amongst di­ver­gent view­points.

The first three es­says writ­ten by In­di­an schol­ars (not In­do-Caribbeans) re­flect an al­most mil­i­tant in­sis­tence on the co­er­cive na­ture of in­den­ture­ship and the op­pres­sive, trau­ma­tis­ing char­ac­ter of the past and even con­tem­po­rary In­do-Caribbean ex­pe­ri­ence.

HC Gup­ta calls In­den­ture an "un­for­tu­nate saga" where­in "more than half-a-mil­lion In­di­ans were lured un­der false promis­es and were trans­port­ed un­der the most prim­i­tive con­di­tions to the Caribbean Is­lands."He in­vokes the pains of the third and fourth gen­er­a­tion In­di­ans in, for ex­am­ple, be­ing ashamed of In­di­an food and dress.

Al­tu­ry Mu­rali, a vis­it­ing pro­fes­sor at UWI from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Hy­der­abad (who edit­ed the col­lec­tion) fol­lows a sim­i­lar line, propos­ing that the "ar­gu­ment that East In­di­ans 'will­ing­ly' and 'by choice' stayed back in Trinidad seems far from re­al­i­ty." Kapil Ku­mar (Di­rec­tor of the In­di­ra Gand­hi Cen­tre for Free­dom Strug­gle Stud­ies and Chair of the Fac­ul­ty of His­to­ry at In­di­ra Gand­hi Na­tion­al Open Uni­ver­si­ty), al­so pro­pos­es that in­den­ture was used (among oth­er things) as a means to trans­port In­di­an rebels from the 1857 Re­bel­lion.

He writes that the sys­tem was fraught with "un­scrupu­lous meth­ods and al­lure­ments to re­cruit labour with false promis­es."

Ku­mar cites a few Trinida­di­an and oth­er schol­ars who pro­pose oth­er­wise, and dis­miss­es them, but ne­glects by far the most de­tailed ex­plo­ration of the char­ac­ter of re­cruit­ment and the treat­ment of in­den­tured labour­ers.This was done by KO Lau­rence in his mag­is­te­r­i­al and ex­haus­tive­ly-re­searched study, A Ques­tion of Labour, which is cit­ed in oth­er con­trib­u­tors in this book.

This seem­ing theme of dis­con­nec­tion in this vol­ume among its con­trib­u­tors and with oth­er books ex­plor­ing the same top­ic(s) is an is­sue of which more will be said lat­er.It's worth di­gress­ing to point out that the no­tions of de­ceiv­ing and co­erc­ing In­di­ans in­to com­ing here, and colo­nial ap­a­thy to their liv­ing con­di­tions, are con­testable.

No few­er than four mis­sions were sent to ex­am­ine the sys­tem of in­den­ture, the last be­ing James Mc­Neil and Chim­man Lal's in the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry, whose re­ports were act­ed up­on. In this vol­ume, Brins­ley Sama­roo's es­say on the "gir­mityas" (con­tract sign­ers) notes: "they were smart enough to know that they were go­ing abroad to do agri­cul­tur­al labour and as in­den­ture pro­gressed, the re­turn­ing labour­ers in­formed the home peo­ple about the re­quire­ments of the New World."

Kusha Haraks­ingh's es­say points to the use of this nar­ra­tive of in­den­tured In­di­ans as un­will­ing em­i­grants with di­vid­ed loy­al­ties to bol­ster the con­cep­tion of In­di­ans as tran­sients and non-cit­i­zens when ev­i­dence, as in the ex­ten­sive long-term in­vest­ments and ac­qui­si­tions they made, in­di­cat­ed the op­po­site.

The In­di­an his­to­ri­ans' un­der­lin­ing the themes of op­pres­sion and colo­nial de­ceit re­veal an in­ter­est­ing per­spec­tive on the way In­den­ture is be­ing "writ­ten" or "re-writ­ten" by In­di­an his­to­ri­ans and his­to­ri­og­ra­phy, and its con­ver­gences and di­ver­gences with the work and ideas of Caribbean his­to­ri­ans of In­di­an ori­gin.This it­self a fas­ci­nat­ing study wait­ing to be un­der­tak­en.

But the out­side per­spec­tives al­so ob­serve things in­sid­ers might miss. A good ex­am­ple is in Mu­rali's es­say, which trans­lates the lyrics of a song from an old In­di­an movie: "The bird in the cage no one knows your pain/You are silent from out­side/you weep in­side, oh, bird, you weep in­side/No­body knows your pain." To any­one who has lived in an In­di­an vil­lage in Trinidad, these few lines pro­vide a stun­ning flash of in­sight in­to the pathos of In­doTrinida­di­an ex­is­tence which has been in­suf­fi­cient­ly ex­plored.

Sub­tleties aside, in the big­ger frame of ref­er­ence themes and tropes of op­pres­sion and cul­tur­al era­sure suf­fuse the In­do-Caribbean writ­ers' and schol­ars' works as well, some­times to great ef­fect. Haraks­ingh's es­say Trou­ble in the Ku­tiya is such a sub­tle work, which ex­am­ines the "lay­ers of mean­ing gen­er­al­ly ob­scured by prob­lems aris­ing from the na­ture of ev­i­dence" which meant the "ex­oge­nous re­con­struc­tion of ex­pe­ri­ence pro­duc­ing not on­ly a con­cen­tra­tion of stereo­types, but sub­sti­tut­ing what oth­ers thought of In­di­ans as the his­to­ry of In­di­ans."

But op­pres­sion con­sti­tutes on­ly one strand of the many knowl­edges the book rather hap­haz­ard­ly as­sem­bles.

Oth­er over­lap­ping top­ics in­clude his­to­ri­an Sher­ry Ann Singh's ex­am­i­na­tion of The Yagna In Trinidad Hin­duism, psy­cho­an­a­lyst Sand­hil Ma­haraj Ram­di­al's ex­plo­ration of The Psy­cho­log­i­cal Rev­er­ence of the Ra­mayan for Trinidad Hin­dus, and Prim­nath Goop­tar's Mem­o­ry, In­di­an Film and the Cre­ation of In­di­an Iden­ti­ty in Trinidad.

These con­sti­tute more in­ter­est­ing in­quiries in­to iden­ti­ty and the psy­cho-so­cial con­struc­tion of In­do-Trinidad, which, as this vol­umeshows, are more ex­ten­sive, com­plex, and re­al than the Cre­ole na­tion­al­ist mythol­o­gy, and many In­do Caribbeans, know or ac­knowl­edge.

Two oth­er in­ter­est­ing and com­pre­hen­sive ar­ti­cles (which un­der­line the lack of ed­i­to­r­i­al co­her­ence) are Aakeil Mur­ray's Pen­te­costal At­tempts to Pros­e­ly­tise to the In­di­an Com­mu­ni­ty in Trinidad 1950-1990, and Visham Bhimull's The Jour­ney of Mod­ern Stan­dard Hin­di from In­den­ture­ship to Present.

Out­side of aca­d­e­m­ic es­says are short­er ar­ti­cles ex­am­in­ing pol­i­tics, broad­cast­ing, mu­sic, and cul­ture gen­er­al­ly, which vary in qual­i­ty.Ram­per­sad Paras­ram ex­am­ines the for­ma­tion of the UNC (The House of the Ris­ing Sun); but (he, like the vol­ume) ne­glects the broad­er his­to­ry of In­do pol­i­tics even from In­de­pen­dence–giv­ing it a few para­graphs.

Sat­nar­ine Balka­rans­ingh ex­am­ines dance, Shar­da Patasar pro­vides "a glimpse" of In­di­an mu­sic, Hans Hanoomans­ingh briefly re­flects on In­do broad­cast­ing, and Shamshu Deen pro­vides a very in­ter­est­ing ar­ti­cle on the method­olog­i­cal is­sues in trac­ing In­di­an roots in Trinidad.

This is all to say that there's more good than bad in terms of con­tent, but the book's afore­men­tioned ed­i­to­r­i­al/epis­temic dis­or­der­li­ness is its ma­jor prob­lem, and its edit­ing/proof­read­ing is a mi­nor one.In the first place, in its stat­ed in­ten­tion to pro­vide a look at the "so­cio-cul­tur­al moor­ings of (the) Di­as­po­ra" this book does not ac­knowl­edge the oth­er sig­nif­i­cant at­tempts to do the same thing.

There have been Across the Dark Wa­ters, edit­ed by David Daby­deen and Brins­ley Sama­roo; From Cal­cut­ta to Ca­roni edit­ed by John La Guerre, which has gone through three re­vised edi­tions; an­oth­er vol­ume ti­tled In­dia in the Caribbean al­so edit­ed by Daby­deen and Sama­roo (pub­lished by Han­sib), and The Con­struc­tion of an In­do Caribbean Di­as­po­ra, edit­ed by Sama­roo and Sher­ry Ann Singh.

These are re­cent works; there is al­so a sig­nif­i­cant amount of the pre- and post-In­de­pen­dence work done by the Niehoffs, Yo­gen­dra Mal­ick, Mor­ton Klass, Ve­ra Ru­bin, Col­in Clarke, Steven Ver­tovec, Aisha Khan, and oth­ers.

The fail­ure to ac­knowl­edge and in­te­grate the pre­vi­ous knowl­edge is dis­rup­tive of con­ti­nu­ity with pre­vi­ous schol­ar­ship, and leads to a sense of re­cur­ring rein­ven­tion of the wheel in this area of study. Al­so, many of the ar­ti­cles are cur­so­ry, which an ed­i­tor should have grouped ac­cord­ing­ly or re­ject­ed. The proof­read­ing er­rors, while not over­whelm­ing, af­fect the read­ing.

All these is­sues aside, In­dia in the Caribbean (So­cio-Cul­tur­al Moor­ings of Di­as­po­ra) is a use­ful, valu­able col­lec­tion. It opens many lines of in­quiry in­to the con­tem­po­rary In­do-Caribbean ex­pe­ri­ence, pro­vides in­sights, and asks ques­tions which it is hoped these will be tak­en up by work­ing schol­ars. The book was launched at the Nalis AV Room in Port-of-Spain on Au­gust 11.

book in­fo

In­dia in the Caribbean: So­cio-Cul­tur­al Moor­ings of Di­as­po­ra

Edit­ed by Al­tu­ry Mu­rali

Pub­lished by the High Com­mis­sion of In­dia, Port-of-Spain


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored