JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, April 28, 2025

Retrenched workers beat NP in Industrial Court

by

20111103

The In­dus­tri­al Court has or­dered the T&T Na­tion­al Pe­tro­le­um Mar­ket­ing Co (NP) to pay three re­trenched em­ploy­ees 24 months of back wages and salaries.In the rul­ing de­liv­ered on Oc­to­ber 24, the court al­so or­dered that the for­mer em­ploy­ees be paid all fixed al­lowances, in­clud­ing any in­creas­es ap­plic­a­ble dur­ing the 24-month pe­ri­od.The ac­tion was brought by the Oil­field Work­ers' Trade Union (OW­TU) on be­half of the work­ers-Court­ney Bar­row, Louis Whar­ton and Ed­mond Arneaud.

The work­ers were told of their re­dun­dan­cy on Feb­ru­ary 15 and 17, 2000, by their im­me­di­ate su­per­vi­sors at the com­pa­ny. The mat­ter was be­fore In­dus­tri­al Court judges Ram­c­hand Lutch­me­di­al and Bindi­mat­tie Ma­habir, who de­liv­ered the judg­ment.The for­mer work­ers claimed they were dis­missed in harsh and op­pres­sive cir­cum­stances, con­trary to the prin­ci­ples of good in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions prac­tice.

At­tor­neys rep­re­sent­ing NP de­nied the union's al­le­ga­tion, say­ing the ter­mi­na­tion of the em­ploy­ees' was a re­sult of gen­uine re­dun­dan­cy caused by ra­tio­nal­i­sa­tion of the com­pa­ny's or­gan­i­sa­tion­al struc­ture.Bar­row, an en­gi­neer, who was 50 at the time of his dis­missal, was un­able to gain em­ploy­ment, with his age be­ing a prob­a­ble fac­tor. In his tes­ti­mo­ny, he said he had since be­come a maxi taxi own­er.Whar­ton, who was 56, was un­suc­cess­ful in se­cur­ing em­ploy­ment, while Arneaud got a job with a ship­ping com­pa­ny.

In pass­ing the judg­ment, Ma­habir said: "It is not dis­put­ed that re­trench­ment is a valid man­age­ment pre­rog­a­tive."NP must en­sure that they fol­low the pro­ce­dures set in the Re­trench­ment and Sev­er­ance Act and en­gage in be­hav­iours that are con­sis­tent with the prin­ci­ples of good in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions prac­tice," she said.In the 20-page judg­ment, Ma­habir said NP failed at this, as it led no cred­i­ble ev­i­dence of a fair cri­te­ria in choos­ing the for­mer em­ploy­ees for dis­missal.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored