JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Economists differ on devaluation,

but question 2024 budget delivery

by

GEISHA KOWLESSAR-ALONZO
419 days ago
20240417

GEISHA KOW­LESSAR-ALON­ZO

With the 2024 mid-year bud­get re­view ex­pect­ed to be de­liv­ered next month, three lead­ing econ­o­mists ex­am­ined the cur­rent state of the econ­o­my, tak­ing in­to con­sid­er­a­tion key fac­tors such as crime, the en­er­gy sec­tor, the de­vel­op­ment of non-en­er­gy ex­ports and more fun­da­men­tal­ly whether the TT dol­lar should be de­val­ued.

Up to Tues­day, Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert had not yet an­nounced a date for mid-year bud­get re­view.

Econ­o­mists Dr Mar­lene Attzs and Dr Vaalmik­ki Ar­joon spoke against a move to de­val­ue while Dr Ronald Ramkissoon, said he was “nei­ther here nor there.”

Attzs told the Busi­ness Guardian that while a de­val­ued cur­ren­cy will make T&T’s ex­ports more com­pet­i­tive, the more sig­nif­i­cant im­pact will make im­ports more ex­pen­sive.

“We im­port prac­ti­cal­ly every­thing we con­sume. The im­me­di­ate im­pact of a de­val­ued TT dol­lar, there­fore, would be a fur­ther in­crease in the cost of liv­ing in­clud­ing on es­sen­tials such as med­i­cines and food­stuff. Many cit­i­zens are bare­ly mak­ing ends meet now so a de­val­u­a­tion would be close to the fi­nal straw for many. And then there are the domi­no im­pacts as busi­ness­es pass on their high­er costs (from spend­ing more for for­eign ex­change) to con­sumers,” she said.

Ar­joon, who shared sim­i­lar sen­ti­ments, said avoid­ing a TT dol­lar de­val­u­a­tion is pru­dent, de­spite the low in­fla­tion, to pre­vent fur­ther price es­ca­la­tion, es­pe­cial­ly amid prospects of high­er prices from in­ter­na­tion­al sup­pli­ers in the short term.

Ramkissoon agreed that de­val­u­a­tion in “some sense” would help T&T be­come more com­pet­i­tive well as bring re­mu­ner­a­tive ben­e­fits to small busi­ness­es.

How­ev­er he ad­vised, “If we go­ing to con­tin­ue to im­port at the cur­rent rate and pref­er­ence then we must al­so think about how we are go­ing to earn the for­eign ex­change to pay for those im­ports. And if we are not earn­ing that in the short term then what do we as house­holds have to do?

“My po­si­tion is I am nei­ther here nor there, at this time, but I think there are ben­e­fits to be de­rived from a de­val­u­a­tion that we can­not ne­glect. I un­der­stand the Gov­ern­ment’s po­si­tion...I know the Gov­ern­ment has in­di­cat­ed time and time again that it wants to avoid the in­creased pres­sures es­pe­cial­ly on those less able to af­ford and I ap­pre­ci­ate that. how­ev­er, it is more a short-term kind of con­sid­er­a­tion. The fact that we have not de­val­ued has not pre­vent­ed a fair amount of suf­fer­ing in the econ­o­my,” Ramkissoon said.

Eco­nom­ic per­for­mance

As it re­lates to how the Gov­ern­ment has per­formed with­in the last year, Attzs said mea­sur­ing this ought not be on the ba­sis of a grade, es­pe­cial­ly when there are so many ex­ter­nal and in­ter­nal risk fac­tors that can im­pact per­for­mance.

A more use­ful ap­proach, she ad­vised, would be to as­sess per­for­mance on the ba­sis of in­di­ca­tors, in­clud­ing eco­nom­ic in­di­ca­tors such as eco­nom­ic growth, un­em­ploy­ment and fac­tors that im­pact qual­i­ty of life.

“I think we need to ask whether they have de­liv­ered on, or demon­strat­ed a com­mit­ment to de­liv­er on, what was promised in bud­get for fis­cal 2024. Gov­ern­ment’s abil­i­ty to de­liv­er on its bud­get com­mit­ments is based, among oth­er things, on what rev­enues they earn, pri­mar­i­ly from the en­er­gy sec­tor. The rev­enue chal­lenge is re­al - nat­ur­al gas pro­duc­tion has de­clined and there gen­er­al­ly is low­er out­put from the en­er­gy sec­tor which trans­lates in­to low­er rev­enues from the en­er­gy sec­tor,” she said.

Re­gard­ing some of the spe­cif­ic bud­get mea­sures that should be re­port­ed on dur­ing the mid-year re­view, Attzs said these should in­clude for­eign ex­change, not­ing the busi­ness com­mu­ni­ty and reg­u­lar cit­i­zens con­tin­ue to face chal­lenges to ob­tain it.

She al­so asked whether there was any up­date on Gov­ern­ment’s com­mit­ment in bud­get 2024 which stat­ed to “… move ag­gres­sive­ly to de­vel­op strate­gies to in­crease the repa­tri­a­tion of for­eign ex­change earned over­seas by lo­cal and for­eign busi­ness­es op­er­at­ing in T&T, as this is key to an in­creased lo­cal sup­ply of for­eign ex­change...”

Attzs al­so not­ed that Gov­ern­ment spoke of a “…new SME forex fa­cil­i­ty with­in the next six months, which should re­duce the de­mand for sales of for­eign ex­change us­ing cred­it cards…”

Re­gard­ing crime, she said as there is an al­most dai­ly di­et of mul­ti­ple mur­ders, the psy­choso­cial and eco­nom­ic im­pact of do­ing busi­ness is be­com­ing more and more oner­ous.

“What progress has been made re­gard­ing the en­hanced crime-fight­ing tools, in­clud­ing tripling of po­lice re­cruits?

“How much of the ‘ad­di­tion­al al­lo­ca­tion to­talling $80 mil­lion …2024 for new ve­hi­cles and equip­ment for the po­lice, over and above the al­lo­ca­tions in 2023…’ has been al­lo­cat­ed to date?

“What, if any, has been the im­prove­ment in de­tec­tion, re­duc­tion of crime giv­en these mea­sures, if they have been im­ple­ment­ed. What is the re­turn on in­vest­ment?” she said.

Attzs fur­ther ad­vised some clar­i­ty is need­ed on what is the cur­rent sta­tus of prop­er­ty tax be­cause af­ter much pub­lic push­back, the res­i­den­tial tax rate moved from three per cent to two per cent.

Ze­ro­ing in on da­ta, Ar­joon cit­ed that de­spite growth at 1.48 per cent in 2022 and 2.56 per cent in 2023, the econ­o­my is still 6.4 per cent short of pre-pan­dem­ic lev­els and con­tin­ues to be fi­nan­cial­ly stressed.

For in­stance, he not­ed fis­cal health has weak­ened, with a six-year ex­pen­di­ture of $37 bil­lion above rev­enues, push­ing debt to $137 bil­lion.

Low­er hy­dro­car­bon ex­ports, cap­i­tal flight and re­duced for­eign di­rect in­vest­ment have helped shrink forex re­serves to US$5.6 bil­lion, ar­ti­fi­cial­ly propped up by ex­ter­nal bor­row­ing and HSF with­drawals, Ar­joon said.

This he said, un­der­scores the im­por­tance of de­vel­op­ing sec­tors with sta­ble, sus­tain­able rev­enues un­af­fect­ed by glob­al geopo­lit­i­cal and eco­nom­ic fluc­tu­a­tions, which in turn, will cre­ate added pro­duc­tive jobs op­por­tu­ni­ties, lim­it the need for ag­gres­sive tax­a­tion that in­hib­it eco­nom­ic ac­tiv­i­ties, cre­ate more pro­duc­tive jobs and low­er in­equal­i­ty lev­els.

“We earned a sur­plus of $416 mil­lion for the first four months of this fis­cal year. For the same pe­ri­od last year, the sur­plus was $793 mil­lion – this is $376 mil­lion high­er than this year. In­deed, this is large­ly be­cause of last year’s ex­tra­or­di­nary price hikes for oil and gas, but more so for LNG, due to the Rus­sia-Ukraine war. That led to en­er­gy rev­enues of $10.6 bil­lion for the first four months fis­cal 2022/2023, sig­nif­i­cant­ly sur­pass­ing the $5.1 bil­lion earned for the cor­re­spond­ing pe­ri­od this year. De­clin­ing pro­duc­tion in oil and gas of ap­prox­i­mate­ly 7,400 bpd and 166 mcf/d re­spec­tive­ly al­so ac­counts for some of these low­er rev­enues,” Ar­joon fur­ther ex­plained.

He not­ed that de­spite the low­er sur­plus, sig­nif­i­cant re­duc­tions in spend­ing, par­tic­u­lar­ly in ar­eas such as cap­i­tal ex­pen­di­ture, are un­like­ly.

Say­ing Gov­ern­ment is keen to avoid un­der­min­ing fur­ther eco­nom­ic ac­tiv­i­ty, a stance that be­comes even more per­ti­nent as the coun­try nears an elec­tion year, Ar­joon said in­stead of cut­ting spend­ing, to com­pen­sate for some rev­enue short­falls, it’s like­ly ad­di­tion­al debt tap­ping in­to both do­mes­tic and in­ter­na­tion­al mar­kets will be need­ed to ful­fil its fis­cal com­mit­ments. He not­ed that the lo­cal mar­ket may of­fer more at­trac­tive bor­row­ing rates, while any funds bor­rowed in­ter­na­tion­al­ly will ar­ti­fi­cial­ly prop up the for­eign re­serves.

Re­gard­ing in­fla­tion, Ar­joon said this has now slowed to 0.8 per cent from a high of 8.3 per cent a year ago.

“This high in­fla­tion last year was not due to ag­gres­sive pri­vate sec­tor ac­tiv­i­ties and con­sumer spend­ing, but due to high in­ter­na­tion­al prices of raw ma­te­ri­als used for man­u­fac­tur­ing and goods im­port­ed for re­sale in the re­tail mar­ket. The Feb­ru­ary 2024 low rate of 0.8 per cent is not re­flec­tive of any mean­ing­ful pol­i­cy to slow in­fla­tion but large­ly due to slug­gish eco­nom­ic ac­tiv­i­ties lo­cal­ly,” he ex­plained.

Al­so, Ar­joon said de­spite in­fla­tion falling, food prices are still high.

Ramkissoon on the oth­er hand called for greater in­vest­ments, say­ing this would gen­er­ate the over­all econ­o­my.

He scored Gov­ern­ment at ei­ther a C plus or B mi­nus for its eco­nom­ic per­for­mance thus far.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored