JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, March 14, 2025

FTC chair: Local cement monopoly undesirable

by

GEISHA KOWLESSAR-ALONZO
Yesterday
20250312

GEISHA KOW­LESSAR-ALON­ZO

chair­man of the Fair Trad­ing Com­mis­sion (FTC), Dr Ronald Ramkissoon, agree­ing that an­oth­er ce­ment sup­pli­er is need­ed in T&T as he ad­vo­cat­ed that com­pe­ti­tion is the best way to grow an econ­o­my.

T&T’s lone ce­ment man­u­fac­tur­er an­nounced a 7 per cent in­crease from Feb­ru­ary 17, 2025 on bagged prod­ucts—such as Pre­mi­um Plus, Eco Ce­ment and Plas­ta Mas­ta while the in­crease in bulk ce­ment took ef­fect from March 5.

Ramkissoon who spoke to the Busi­ness Guardian about this lat­est price in­crease at a me­dia work­shop host­ed by the FTC on Tues­day said, “We are very con­cerned about the im­pact of ce­ment on the con­struc­tion sec­tor be­cause we un­der­stand that con­struc­tion con­tributes sub­stan­tial­ly to eco­nom­ic growth. Trinidad and To­ba­go is in­ter­est­ed in a faster grow­ing econ­o­my and there­fore, any­thing that can ham­per that growth for ex­am­ple, if it is ce­ment prices, we will not ad­vo­cate for that. In­deed, we want to make sure that con­sumers, oth­er busi­ness­es and the Gov­ern­ment it­self ben­e­fit from a com­pet­i­tive mar­ket through greater choic­es and through bet­ter prices.”

He said the FTC con­tin­ues to do its work in re­spect of these price in­creas­es tak­ing in­to ac­count the rea­sons from TCL.

“We lis­tened to the pro­duc­er in terms of their jus­ti­fi­ca­tion. We lis­tened to them in re­spect of their con­tri­bu­tion to em­ploy­ment, to for­eign ex­change earn­ings and to their pay­ment of tax­es.

“We lis­tened to that but at the same time we are aware that one pro­duc­er is very of­ten not the best way to go. So we looked at what has been hap­pen­ing in re­spect of im­ports and we see what the min­istry (Min­istry of Trade) it­self has been say­ing in re­spect of low­er­ing the CET (com­mon ex­ter­nal tar­iff) in re­spect of in­creas­ing pos­si­ble sup­pli­ers on the mar­ket and we think that is the way to go for any mar­ket in which you have a mo­nop­o­lis­tic sit­u­a­tion. So our dis­cus­sions, our re­search is along those lines be­cause we be­lieve the more com­pe­ti­tion we have, the bet­ter choic­es con­sumers would have,” Ramkissoon em­pha­sised.

At the same time, the for­mer man­ag­er of Re­pub­lic Bank Ltd’s Eco­nom­ic In­tel­li­gence Unit said while the FTC not­ed the ce­ment price in­creas­es, it al­so took in­to con­sid­er­a­tion that prices of raw ma­te­ri­als have been ris­ing since COVID and al­so as a con­se­quence of the Rus­sia-Ukraine war.

“In many cas­es prices have not come down. The rate of in­crease have in fact been low­er as we see in Trinidad and To­ba­go but prices re­main high and every so of­ten there is a new event glob­al­ly that re­sults in an in­crease in prices. So that sup­ply chain then is un­der con­tin­u­ous stress. We are aware of that,” the se­nior econ­o­mist said.

At the same time, be­ing aware of that does not equate to com­pla­cen­cy on the part of the FTC.

“We still con­sid­er a sit­u­a­tion where you have a mo­nop­o­lis­tic pro­duc­er as one that is un­de­sir­able or one that has to be mon­i­tored close­ly and we ask for ex­pla­na­tions but we do not on­ly de­pend on that,” Ramkissoon said.

In this re­gard, he ex­plained the FTC looked at the price of ce­ment in the rest of the Caribbean and even in the rest of the world, how dif­fi­cult it is for com­pa­nies to im­port ce­ment and ad­vise ac­cord­ing­ly in a way that the con­struc­tion sec­tor and the econ­o­my can grow.

TCL in­creased the price of ce­ment for a fifth time since De­cem­ber 2021.

On whether Gov­ern­ment took too long to in­ter­vene, Ramkissoon said, “I think the Gov­ern­ment has in­ter­vened for many years now in re­spect of ce­ment. There is that bal­ance, which I dis­cern the Gov­ern­ment is try­ing to strike be­tween a com­pa­ny that of its very na­ture has to be large giv­en the na­ture of what it does and the fact that it con­tributes to em­ploy­ment, to for­eign ex­change earn­ings and so on.

“At the same tim,e I think the Gov­ern­ment has in­di­cat­ed it is very much aware that high­er prices which are un­jus­ti­fied can­not be in the best in­ter­est of the con­sumer and there­fore, there has al­ways been this arrange­ment un­der the Com­mon Ex­ter­nal Tar­iff where the Gov­ern­ment would go and ask for a re­duc­tion in the CET. We have al­so seen move­ment in the quo­tas. Now we ex­pect that bal­ance in try­ing to keep a com­pa­ny afloat and try­ing to en­sure that com­pa­ny con­tributes to the econ­o­my of Trinidad and To­ba­go against prices and against the con­sumer. I think that bal­ance is very im­por­tant.”

He fur­ther not­ed the FTC con­tin­ues to get “be­hind the num­bers” as it asks com­pa­nies for de­tails to “jus­ti­fy what they are say­ing” when an in­crease oc­curs.

“We bring to bear oth­er de­vel­op­ments in the econ­o­my, oth­er de­vel­op­ments in the world on the prices that we are see­ing and where nec­es­sary we ad­vise ac­cord­ing­ly.

“I would al­so say we are em­pow­ered un­der the act (Fair Trad­ing Act) to take com­pa­nies to the court if we be­lieve they are be­ing an­ti-com­pet­i­tive as de­fined in the law,” Ramkissoon added.

Em­pha­sis­ing that the FTC is all about want­i­ng the econ­o­my to grow, Ramkissoon added it al­so wants so-called large com­pa­nies to al­so con­tribute to the econ­o­my, em­ploy peo­ple and to in­vest, adding that out of in­vest­ments com­pa­nies pay tax­es among oth­er eco­nom­ic ben­e­fits in­clud­ing the earn­ing of forex.

How­ev­er, at the same time Ramkissoon main­tained that large, medi­um-sized or small com­pa­nies “can­not be al­lowed to take ad­van­tage of oth­er busi­ness­es or of the con­sumer.”

Pressed on whether TCL was be­ing un­fair to the con­sumer or should be tak­en to task by the FTC based on its con­sec­u­tive price in­creas­es over the years, Ramkissoon said the FTC asked TCL “di­rect­ly for an­swers” but stat­ed that the FTC “has not ar­rived at a con­clu­sive po­si­tion as yet.”

“How­ev­er, at the end of the day, we think com­pe­ti­tion, ad­di­tion­al com­pe­ti­tion in the mar­ket is the best way to go,” he added.

Broad­er re­search on ce­ment in­dus­try need­ed

Re­search on the con­struc­tion sec­tor in T&T ought not to be lim­it­ed in terms of the con­sumer, busi­ness­es, or of TCL it­self, but this must al­so be ap­plied to po­ten­tial sup­pli­ers and why they are not im­port­ing, the FTC’s ex­ec­u­tive di­rec­tor Be­van Nar­i­nesingh sug­gest­ed.

“Some of the re­search that could be done in­clude whether it is be­cause of the high costs of im­port­ing ce­ment or pos­si­bly the abil­i­ty to ac­cess re­sources to pay for the ce­ment. One thing you have to look at is oth­er mar­kets in the re­gion and to see if there are con­cerns re­gard­ing com­pe­ti­tion and if there are al­ter­na­tives in these oth­er coun­tries in terms of sup­pli­ers,” said Nar­i­nesingh who al­so spoke to the Busi­ness Guardian at the event.

He al­so echoed sim­i­lar sen­ti­ments that the FTC is com­mit­ted to en­sur­ing a fair and com­pet­i­tive mar­ket through­out the econ­o­my, in­clud­ing the ce­ment in­dus­try.

He ex­plained this is be­ing done through en­force­ment of the Fair Trad­ing Act, which al­so means re­search is done as well as in­ves­ti­ga­tions in­to the prac­tices in the in­dus­try, in­clud­ing if nec­es­sary, re­ceiv­ing com­plaints about pos­si­ble an­ti-com­pet­i­tive con­duct.

TCL price hikes

Be­fore the 2025 price in­crease, TCL in­creased prices on Feb­ru­ary 19, 2024. Then, TCL said the hike was due to the con­tin­u­ous in­fla­tion that af­fects the in­dus­try and oth­er eco­nom­ic sec­tors, mak­ing it nec­es­sary to ad­just the price of ce­ment by then $3 per sack. That took the price of the 42.5 kilo­gram sack of Pre­mi­um Plus ce­ment to $57.38 VAT-in­clu­sive, while Eco ce­ment in 42.5 kilo­gram sacks rose to $52.88 VAT-in­clu­sive.

​TCL had al­so in­creased prices on March 20, 2023, by eight per cent for Pre­mi­um Plus and five per cent for Eco ce­ment.

At that time, the com­pa­ny said, “Ce­ment prices are in fact set to be mar­gin­al­ly ad­just­ed, tak­ing in­to con­sid­er­a­tion some of the ris­ing cost fac­tors with which TCL is faced.”

In Au­gust 2022, prices went up by $3.54 for Pre­mi­um Plus, which went to $47.83 and by $2.08 for Eco ce­ment, in­creas­ing it to $43.65.

In De­cem­ber 2021, TCL raised the price of a 42.5 Kg sack of Pre­mi­um Plus by 15 per cent to $46.56 VAT-in­clu­sive and Eco ce­ment by 8% to $43.71 VAT-in­clu­sive.

Trade Min­is­ter Paula Gopee-Scoon had said the Gov­ern­ment did not sup­port TCL’s lat­est pro­posed price hike as she called for more sup­pli­ers in the mar­ket.

Speak­ing dur­ing a tour of Cream­ery Nov­el­ties at the Di­a­mond Vale In­dus­tri­al Es­tate in Diego Mar­tin on Feb­ru­ary 18, this year the min­is­ter had said, “The Gov­ern­ment will not coun­te­nance the con­tin­ued in­creas­es by TCL in the mar­ket­place.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored