JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, April 6, 2025

Bribes still passing at Licensing

...of­fi­cers com­plain about low salaries

by

Johua Seemungal
531 days ago
20231022
Licensing officers stop a truck driver during a road block exercise along the Old St Joseph Road, Port-of-Spain, in March.

Licensing officers stop a truck driver during a road block exercise along the Old St Joseph Road, Port-of-Spain, in March.

KERWIN PIERRE

Se­nior Mul­ti­me­dia Re­porter

joshua.seemu­n­gal@guardian.co.tt

De­spite moves to crack down on cor­rup­tion at the Trans­port Di­vi­sion’s Li­cens­ing of­fices, sev­er­al em­ploy­ees say fraud­u­lent ac­tiv­i­ties—rang­ing from small-time bribes from touts for cer­ti­fied copies to unau­tho­rised ve­hi­cle trans­fers and du­pli­ca­tion of li­cense plates—con­tin­ue in the or­gan­i­sa­tion.

The Sun­day Guardian spoke to sev­er­al em­ploy­ees whose names or po­si­tions can­not be re­vealed out of con­cern for their jobs and safe­ty.

Some em­ploy­ees said that while there has been a con­cert­ed ef­fort in the di­vi­sion un­der Trans­port Com­mis­sion­er Clive Clarke to tack­le cor­rup­tion, it re­mains part of the or­gan­i­sa­tion’s cul­ture.

Ear­li­er this month, two staff mem­bers—Li­cens­ing Of­fi­cer Er­rol Su­per­sad and Tem­po­rary Clerk I Sudesh Rad­hakissoon—who worked at the Wright­son Road, Port-of-Spain of­fice, were charged with mis­be­hav­iour in pub­lic of­fice. They were ac­cused of over­see­ing an unau­tho­rised ve­hi­cle trans­fer.

The em­ploy­ees de­scribed the ar­rests as “a show”, ask­ing, “What about the rest?”

“You can’t get away from it, and you can’t get rid of all the em­ploy­ees. It’s un­der­stood. For ex­am­ple, when the touts come in to get cer­ti­fied copies, you of­ten get $100 with the re­ceipt. What am I go­ing to do? Give them back?” one em­ploy­ee asked.

“You could be the right­eous one, but you will like­ly end up suf­fer­ing. You will be liv­ing on a nor­mal salary and every­one else would be dri­ving an ex­pen­sive ve­hi­cle, eat­ing the best food, liv­ing nice­ly, trav­el­ling the world, and if you do the right thing, you suf­fer. So it is very dif­fi­cult to walk that path, but peo­ple don’t re­alise that,” an­oth­er em­ploy­ee said.

Ac­cord­ing to the em­ploy­ees, Li­cens­ing Di­vi­sion has its own cul­ture.

They ad­mit­ted that Com­mis­sion­er Clarke’s poli­cies have seen a de­cline in cor­rup­tion, say­ing that in the past, it was far more ram­pant.

The em­ploy­ees said with the new sys­tem, one per­son is no longer re­spon­si­ble for over­see­ing the en­tire process from be­gin­ning to end, al­low­ing for more checks and bal­ances.

They es­ti­mat­ed that around 50 to 60 per cent of Li­cens­ing/Trans­port Di­vi­sion work­ers are scrupu­lous.

The of­fi­cers ad­mit­ted, how­ev­er, that they can­not con­firm that even those they be­lieve are clean are in­deed above board.

They said while the changes have made it more dif­fi­cult to “run bobol”, peo­ple found their way around the sys­tem. They said once some­one be­comes ac­quaint­ed with an of­fi­cer or a clerk and enough mon­ey is passed, any­thing is pos­si­ble.

“What they (cor­rupt of­fi­cers) tend to do is, let’s say, for ex­am­ple, you want to do a trans­fer. You want to pay for it, but you don’t want to come in and go through the whole process. You (as the client) and I (as the cor­rupt of­fi­cer) would do the trans­fer and that’s that. There’s no one to re­port any is­sues there be­cause we would both be at fault, and we don’t want that in­for­ma­tion out.

“How­ev­er, if some­one in your fam­i­ly pass­es away and there’s a third par­ty who wants to buy your de­ceased rel­a­tive’s ve­hi­cle, you con­nect with an of­fi­cer to trans­fer the ve­hi­cle. But your broth­er want­ed the ve­hi­cle, so he will won­der how the ve­hi­cle end­ed up be­ing trans­ferred in­to the third par­ty’s name. He will then re­port it.

“When they (the au­thor­i­ties) do the in­ves­ti­ga­tion, they may say this man is dead, he could not have trans­ferred the ve­hi­cle. So they go through the file and that’s where some em­ploy­ees end up get­ting caught. The on­ly rea­son it would be high­light­ed or in­ves­ti­gat­ed is if some­one queries it,” an em­ploy­ee said.

Licensing officers conduct a road exercise along Independence Square, Port-of-Spain, last November.

Licensing officers conduct a road exercise along Independence Square, Port-of-Spain, last November.

KERWIN PIERRE

The em­ploy­ees lament­ed that the rel­a­tive­ly low salaries paid in the di­vi­sion con­tribute to the like­li­hood of work­ers tak­ing bribes.

They es­ti­mat­ed that a Clerk I car­ries home be­tween $5,000 to $6,000 a month, while the av­er­age of­fi­cer earns less than $10,000 a month.

Li­cens­ing Di­vi­sion work­ers are rep­re­sent­ed by the Pub­lic Ser­vices As­so­ci­a­tion (PSA). The Gov­ern­ment has of­fered a salary in­crease of four per cent for the ne­go­ti­at­ing pe­ri­ods: 2014 to 2017, as well as from 2017 to 2020. PSA Pres­i­dent Leroy Bap­tiste has re­ject­ed the of­fer, call­ing it in­suf­fi­cient. The Li­cens­ing sources agreed, say­ing four per cent would not do any­thing to im­prove their stan­dard of liv­ing.

“For ex­am­ple, one of the ex­pe­ri­enced of­fi­cers’ name has been men­tioned in a lot of things, but they can’t prove any­thing yet. You hear so many things. For in­stance, the ve­hi­cle num­ber du­pli­cates is­sue, the on­ly way you could get that is from peo­ple who are high up in the sys­tem. So it’s like pol­i­tics in some ways—I can’t say you are thiev­ing be­cause I am thiev­ing too.

“We know of an of­fi­cer who is black­list­ed in a cer­tain di­vi­sion be­cause he/she not do­ing what the oth­ers are do­ing. He/she is treat­ed very dif­fer­ent­ly be­cause they are not in­to cor­rup­tion. He/she had their life threat­ened,” an em­ploy­ee lament­ed. The em­ploy­ees were re­luc­tant to give out any spe­cif­ic in­for­ma­tion about in­stances of cor­rup­tion out of con­cern for their safe­ty and the safe­ty of their col­leagues.

A truck makes its way into the loading bay at the Licensing Division, San Fernando, to be inspected last January.

A truck makes its way into the loading bay at the Licensing Division, San Fernando, to be inspected last January.

KRISTIAN DE SILVA

The two men ac­cused of over­see­ing an unau­tho­rised ve­hi­cle trans­fer ear­li­er this month were the first Li­cens­ing of­fi­cers to be charged in 2023, ac­cord­ing to the Trans­port Com­mis­sion­er.

The em­ploy­ees are ac­cused of fraud­u­lent­ly sign­ing and prepar­ing ve­hi­cle trans­fer doc­u­ments. They were ar­rest­ed on Oc­to­ber 2 and grant­ed bail. They are ex­pect­ed to ap­pear be­fore a Port-of-Spain Mag­is­trates’ Court on Oc­to­ber 24.

Guardian Me­dia sought to find out from the Trinidad and To­ba­go Po­lice Ser­vice how many Li­cens­ing of­fi­cers were charged with of­fences in the last three years but did not re­ceive a re­sponse.

In late 2020, Min­is­ter of Works and Trans­port Ro­han Sinanan re­vealed that 20 em­ploy­ees were un­der sus­pen­sion and in­ves­ti­ga­tion for un­eth­i­cal prac­tices, while in late 2019, two for­mer Li­cens­ing em­ploy­ees were among five peo­ple charged with con­spir­ing to de­fraud the State by mak­ing false en­tries on the Trans­port Min­istry’s li­cens­ing data­base.

It is no se­cret that the Trans­port Di­vi­sion’s Li­cens­ing of­fices have long had a rep­u­ta­tion for be­ing a hub for cor­rup­tion, as ac­knowl­edged by sev­er­al for­mer and present min­is­ters of Works and Trans­port and Com­mis­sion­ers of Trans­port. In Oc­to­ber 2019, Works and Trans­port Min­is­ter Ro­han Sinanan pledged to clean up cor­rup­tion in the Li­cens­ing Di­vi­sion by in­tro­duc­ing im­proved tech­nol­o­gy to of­fices.

“With tech­nol­o­gy be­ing used we could min­imise the un­eth­i­cal prac­tices tak­ing place at the Li­cense (sic) Of­fice. Be­cause I am not go­ing to put my head in the sand and say the Li­cense of­fice is the best place on earth. It is not, but we in­tend to take the fight on and clean up the Li­cense Of­fice,” he had said.

Com­mis­sion­er Clarke echoed the min­is­ter’s sen­ti­ments when un­veil­ing new up­grades to the Li­cens­ing Di­vi­sion’s sys­tem in April 2022. The up­grades in­clud­ed chang­ing the li­cens­ing sys­tem from a pa­per-based to a com­put­erised one.

“I have dis­cov­ered there are a num­ber of per­sons walk­ing around with fraud­u­lent doc­u­ments such as fraud­u­lent dri­ver’s per­mits, cer­ti­fied copies, fraud­u­lent ap­provals from the com­mis­sion­er to use horns on their ve­hi­cles. I have dis­cov­ered most of these doc­u­ments were not gen­er­at­ed in the Li­cens­ing Di­vi­sion. In oth­er words, the tint cer­tifi­cate we are giv­ing, some­one could go and make that and show it to a law en­force­ment of­fi­cer,” Clarke had said.

In May 2012, for­mer trans­port min­is­ter De­vant Ma­haraj said that four Li­cens­ing of­fi­cers were ar­rest­ed by po­lice of­fi­cers who were in­ves­ti­gat­ing the il­le­gal im­por­ta­tion and reg­is­tra­tion of ve­hi­cles. For­mer trans­port com­mis­sion­er Reuben Cato had said cor­rup­tion would re­main as long as the sys­tem was not com­put­erised.

Rigid mea­sures to tack­le cor­rup­tion–Trans­port Com­mis­sion­er

Transport Commissioner Clive Clarke

Transport Commissioner Clive Clarke

INNIS FRANCIS

Trans­port Com­mis­sion­er Clive Clarke is hell-bent on root­ing out un­scrupu­lous be­hav­iours in and out­side the Li­cens­ing Di­vi­sion.

Clarke said if he fails to tack­le wrong­do­ing and il­le­gal ac­tiv­i­ties, then he would be part of the prob­lem.

On Fri­day, Clarke spoke about some of the rigid mea­sures he had to im­ple­ment to im­prove the di­vi­sion’s ser­vices and make the state-run or­gan­i­sa­tion which falls un­der the Min­istry of Works and Trans­port ac­count­able and trans­par­ent.

The tight­en­ing of ve­hi­cle trans­fers and du­pli­ca­tion of dri­ver’s per­mits were two ar­eas Clarke fo­cused on.

“We have im­ple­ment­ed cer­tain rules and busi­ness process­es that must hap­pen be­fore cer­tain trans­ac­tions take place.”

Clarke, who said he pre­ferred to use the words “un­scrupu­lous be­hav­iour” in­stead of cor­rupt prac­tices said, “We have im­ple­ment­ed a sys­tem where your dri­ver’s per­mit will not print un­less you par­tic­i­pate in the pro­vi­sion­al per­mit re­quire­ment and the reg­u­la­tion’s test. In oth­er words, you must be present.”

Clarke said they have been view­ing com­ments in the pub­lic do­main that ve­hi­cles are not doc­u­ment­ed on their sys­tem when they vis­it an in­spec­tion garage.

“To in­spect a ve­hi­cle a cou­ple of years ago you were re­quired to car­ry a cer­ti­fied copy and that garage or whoso­ev­er will in­spect your ve­hi­cle. We had per­sons walk­ing around with bo­gus cer­ti­fied copies of stolen ve­hi­cles and ve­hi­cles that were du­pli­cat­ed and so forth. And there­fore those ve­hi­cles were in­spect­ed for years. We have since cur­tailed that. We had sit­u­a­tions where the min­istry by its poor process­es al­lowed these types of trans­ac­tions to take place.”

He said they de­vel­oped a sys­tem “that these test­ing sta­tions can on­ly in­spect your ve­hi­cles when your record has a lev­el of ac­cu­ra­cy.”

Clarke said if a sta­tion choos­es to in­spect a ve­hi­cle with­out ac­cu­ra­cy they will know and ac­tion can be tak­en against the sta­tion op­er­a­tor.

“So far we have re­cov­ered over 75 stolen ve­hi­cles be­cause of this new in­spec­tion sys­tem. Sad­ly, we have seen sit­u­a­tions where ve­hi­cles have been lit­er­al­ly reg­is­tered twice, with two num­bers, but the same chas­sis num­bers. What we did? We digi­tised the en­tire pack­age so that when these ve­hi­cles resur­face we can treat the mat­ter. And there­fore these are the mech­a­nisms we have been us­ing.”

Clarke urged the pub­lic to re­port any dis­hon­est act to the po­lice.

As the Li­cens­ing Di­vi­sion un­der­goes a ma­jor trans­for­ma­tion ex­er­cise, Clarke ad­mits that he has been faced with chal­lenges.

“There will al­ways be dif­fi­cul­ties. The com­mis­sion­er is not im­mune to that. We have been find­ing ways to over­come these chal­lenges.”

Opt­ing not to dwell on the re­cent ar­rest and charge of a Li­cens­ing Of­fi­cer, cler­i­cal work­er and mem­ber of the pub­lic, Clarke said as the di­vi­sion tries to im­prove its ser­vices and root out wrong­do­ing at times “the chips may fall where they may”.

“I as trans­port com­mis­sion­er, once some­thing is brought to my at­ten­tion and there is sub­stan­tial ev­i­dence to treat with it. I have a re­spon­si­bil­i­ty. If I don’t treat with it, then I am part of the prob­lem. I would take any is­sue in terms of ap­par­ent mis­be­hav­iour very se­ri­ous­ly. And there­fore that is our mantra.”

In the last few months, Clarke said his staff has been wel­com­ing the changes and try­ing to elim­i­nate strange prac­tices.

 Clarke be­lieves that “Once we have mech­a­nisms that can trace, track and pro­vide a lev­el of ac­count­abil­i­ty it will cre­ate a lev­el of de­ter­rence with­in the sys­tem.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored