JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, April 4, 2025

Chambers’ intervention stirs tensions as port dispute escalates

by

140 days ago
20241115

Se­nior Re­porter

akash.sama­roo@cnc3.co.tt

While four of the coun­try’s lead­ing busi­ness cham­bers may have thought they were help­ing to re­solve the stand-off be­tween port work­ers and the Gov­ern­ment, their in­ter­ven­tion could have the op­po­site ef­fect.

The Na­tion­al Trade Union Cen­tre (NATUC) is now warn­ing that their ac­tions might es­ca­late ten­sions and may fan the flames of in­dus­tri­al ac­tion. On Wednes­day, the Amer­i­can Cham­ber of Com­merce of Trinidad and To­ba­go (Am­cham T&T), the En­er­gy Cham­ber of T&T, the T&T Cham­ber of In­dus­try and Com­merce, and the T&T Man­u­fac­tur­ers As­so­ci­a­tion, in a state­ment, called on the Gov­ern­ment to ur­gent­ly take what­ev­er ac­tion nec­es­sary to re­solve the on­go­ing in­dus­tri­al ac­tion caus­ing chaos at the Port of Port-of-Spain.

What was in­tend­ed as a move to break the dead­lock left the NATUC dis­pleased with the tone and in­fer­ence of the state­ment.

In a me­dia re­lease, NATUC said, “This state­ment from the cham­bers ap­pears to show a deeply bi­ased, one-sided fo­cus on the com­mer­cial sec­tor’s in­ter­ests, pri­ori­tis­ing car­go move­ment over the le­git­i­mate, long­stand­ing con­cerns of dock­work­ers.”

SWW­TU pres­i­dent gen­er­al Michael Anisette told Guardian Me­dia that their in­put can make mat­ters worse. “If we are se­ri­ous about the ports as the cham­bers want to make us be­lieve, and their ap­proach is to call for the Gov­ern­ment to in­ter­vene swift­ly, that is fu­elling in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions fires that we don’t want be­cause they are fan­ning the flames with those state­ments. Be­cause it is demon­strat­ing that their con­cern is on­ly their busi­ness. Dock work­ers are not peo­ple,” Anisette said.

“You have to bal­ance com­mer­cial­ism in the con­text of work­ers’ is­sues and hu­man be­ings, and com­mer­cial­ism can­not trump work­ers’ rights with the great­est of re­spect to every­one who might say Anisette is crazy. But who gen­er­ates the wealth, and who buys the goods and ser­vices of the same com­mer­cial en­ti­ties? It’s the very same work­ers, so you must find a bal­ance.” The SWW­TU head said the cham­bers have now shown where their re­al con­cerns lie, and it is not in the in­ter­est of dock­work­ers or work­ers in gen­er­al.

Mean­while, NATUC and the SWW­TU de­nounced any at­tempt to al­low po­lit­i­cal in­ter­ests to over­ride sound com­mer­cial de­ci­sions that would bol­ster the port’s op­er­a­tional ef­fi­cien­cy and growth.

 

Am­cham CEO: We are hope­ful the par­ties come to a res­o­lu­tion

But Am­cham T&T CEO Ni­rad Tewarie said that was not the in­ten­tion at all. He said that they have al­ways tried to make it clear that the role of busi­ness in so­ci­ety was to cre­ate so­cio-eco­nom­ic im­prove­ment.

“When we called on the au­thor­i­ties to act, one can in­ter­pret that how­ev­er one wants, but we are not the ar­biters of the dis­pute. There are mech­a­nisms for dis­putes to be ar­bi­trat­ed, and we would like to see those mech­a­nisms utilised,” Tewarie ex­plained to Guardian Me­dia.

He point­ed out that the SWW­TU and NATUC have al­so called on the Gov­ern­ment to act in the past.

“So I’m not sure our state­ment should be tak­en in that light, and we are hope­ful that all par­ties could come to a res­o­lu­tion that would be ben­e­fi­cial for the coun­try be­cause once this ac­tion per­sists, it is all of us who suf­fer; con­sumers and work­ers,” the Am­cham CEO said.

Mean­while, it ap­pears as if the state­ment from the joint cham­bers has led to some ac­tion from the Gov­ern­ment.

Less than a day af­ter the cham­bers’ re­lease was dis­sem­i­nat­ed, Anisette re­ceived a call from the Labour Min­istry.

“The on­ly thing I can say is I got a call from the Min­istry (of Labour) ask­ing if we could doc­u­ment what are the is­sues be­cause the min­is­ter will like to know, as a pol­i­cy de­ci­sion, what are the is­sues,” Anisette re­vealed.

How­ev­er, Anisette said this con­fused him, and he made that clear to the min­istry of­fi­cial. “I said I find this is strange. Are you telling me that the Min­is­ter of Labour is not aware of the is­sues that are go­ing on at the ports? They said they have a process that if it have dis­putes, they get a break­down from the two par­ties so that the min­is­ter can be aware. What can I say about that? Be­cause I was tak­en aback and was shocked,” he added.

But he said the caller ex­plained that this was part of the of­fi­cial process. Anisette told Guardian Me­dia, “Those is­sues are in the pub­lic do­main, so are you telling me that no­body from the Labour Min­istry was pay­ing at­ten­tion? Or maybe they want it in writ­ing; I don’t know why. Be­cause they said they have to get it from the Port Au­thor­i­ty too.”

The Port Au­thor­i­ty of Trinidad and To­ba­go (PATT) chair­man, Lyle Alexan­der, in­di­cat­ed that the au­thor­i­ty re­ceived a sim­i­lar call from the Labour Min­istry. Anisette said he would like to meet with his ex­ec­u­tive be­fore send­ing any­thing to the Labour Min­istry.

Ac­cord­ing to NATUC’s me­dia re­lease, chief among the is­sues for work­ers is the im­ple­men­ta­tion of a 12 per cent salary in­crease for al­most 1,500 dock­work­ers for the ne­go­ti­at­ing pe­ri­od from 2014 to 2017. Health and safe­ty con­cerns for work­ers are al­so a pri­or­i­ty for the union.

Works and Trans­port Min­is­ter Ro­han Sinanan did not re­spond to ques­tions from Guardian Me­dia, nor did Min­is­ter in the Min­istry Richie Sookhai. The Min­istry of Works and Trans­port is the line min­istry for the ports.

All hands on deck to solve im­passe—Gopee-Scoon

How­ev­er, Trade and In­dus­try Min­is­ter Paula Gopee-Scoon, who would un­doubt­ed­ly have a vest­ed in­ter­est in the mat­ter, sought to as­sure that all hands were on deck to solve the im­passe.

“The Min­istry of Trade and In­dus­try has been in dis­cus­sion with the Min­istry of Works and Trans­port on the on­go­ing is­sue and its ef­fect on busi­ness. The MOWT, how­ev­er, re­mains the lead on the sub­ject.

“There’s a whole-of-gov­ern­ment ap­proach, and we are look­ing for­ward to the end of the im­passe soon­est,” she said via What­sApp Mes­sen­ger.

Asked if she is wor­ried about this im­passe spilling over in­to the height of the Christ­mas sea­son, Gopee-Scoon replied, “I am al­ways con­cerned for the wel­fare of all busi­ness­es.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored