JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

‘Chris Must List’ released from Immigration Detention Centre

by

219 days ago
20240910
Canadian vlogger Christopher “Chris Must List” Hughes

Canadian vlogger Christopher “Chris Must List” Hughes

Se­nior Re­porter

jensen.lavende@guardian.co.tt

Af­ter the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty la­belled him as an “un­de­sir­able” in its de­por­ta­tion or­der and de­tained him to send him out of the coun­try, vlog­ger Christo­pher “Chris Must List” Hugh­es was or­dered to be re­leased yes­ter­day.

The or­der came from High Court Judge Robin Mo­hammed af­ter Hugh­es’ at­tor­neys Jagdeo Singh, Ger­ald Ramdeen and Vashisht Seep­er­sad filed a ju­di­cial re­view chal­leng­ing the de­por­ta­tion or­der. Mo­hammed al­so set a date for a case man­age­ment hear­ing to Oc­to­ber 23 and gave the State up to Sep­tem­ber 23 to re­spond to the at­tor­neys while Hugh­es’ le­gal team was giv­en up to Oc­to­ber 7 to re­ply.

The court mat­ter be­gan just af­ter 3 pm and last­ed less than 30 min­utes. By 7.25 pm Hugh­es was re­leased from the Im­mi­gra­tion De­ten­tion Cen­tre in Aripo and greet­ed by Ramdeen.

In their ap­pli­ca­tion, the at­tor­neys asked for the court to de­clare that the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty’s de­por­ta­tion or­der is “ir­ra­tional, un­rea­son­able and il­le­gal” and that his ar­rest and sub­se­quent de­ten­tion were in breach of Hugh­es’ fun­da­men­tal rights un­der Sec­tions 4 (a), (b) 5(2) c (i) and(ii) and sec­tion 5(2) h of the Con­sti­tu­tion.

The 11-point re­quest al­so in­clud­ed that the court quash the de­por­ta­tion or­der and have the State pay the le­gal cost of the ap­pli­ca­tion and oth­er ex­pens­es deemed fit.

Dur­ing yes­ter­day’s court hear­ing. Ramdeen sought to have the court de­ter­mine that fol­low­ing Hugh­es’ re­lease, the State would not pre­vent him from re-en­ter­ing the coun­try, should he be per­mit­ted to leave.

Hugh­es is cur­rent­ly fac­ing a two-year jail term or a $100,000 fine for pub­lish­ing a sedi­tious state­ment. His mat­ter was ad­journed to Jan­u­ary next year. He re­turned to the coun­try on Au­gust 18 for the hear­ing sched­uled for the 23 and had to lodge his pass­port with the reg­is­trar of the High Court as part of his bail con­di­tions.

On Fri­day he will ap­pear be­fore Jus­tice In­drani Ce­de­no to vary his bail which will al­low him to re­gain his pass­port, leave the coun­try and pos­si­bly ap­pear vir­tu­al­ly in Jan­u­ary. The de­por­ta­tion or­der is the third time that Hugh­es was held. His first ar­rest led to his sedi­tion charge. His sec­ond ar­rest on Sep­tem­ber 5 on mon­ey laun­der­ing al­le­ga­tions.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored