JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

COP, HOPE consider alliance with Griffith’s NTA

by

64 days ago
20241217
NTA political leader Gary Griffith

NTA political leader Gary Griffith

Akash Sama­roo

Se­nior Re­porter/Pro­duc­er

akash.sama­roo@cnc3.co.tt

Two po­lit­i­cal par­ties that have dis­tanced them­selves from any for­mal part­ner­ship with the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) are now con­sid­er­ing join­ing forces with the Na­tion­al Trans­for­ma­tion Al­liance (NTA). 

And the NTA has of­fered the UNC a place in its po­lit­i­cal arrange­ment. 

Mere days af­ter it seemed as if the UNC had teamed up with the Con­gress of the Peo­ple and the HOPE par­ty, both par­ties re­vealed they may sign an of­fi­cial agree­ment with the NTA for a strate­gic al­liance go­ing in­to the next gen­er­al elec­tion. 

News of this broke when Guardian Me­dia asked NTA leader Gary Grif­fith for a com­ment as it per­tained to the COP’s state­ment that de­spite me­dia re­ports, the par­ty had not for­mal­ly en­tered in­to any arrange­ment with the Op­po­si­tion. Grif­fith re­vealed that pri­or to that meet­ing at the UNC’s head­quar­ters, the NTA had been hav­ing week­ly dis­cus­sions with HOPE and the COP. 

“We have had reg­u­lar meet­ings for the last few months. The NTA, HOPE, COP and NGOs (non-gov­ern­men­tal or­gan­i­sa­tions) and the on­ly thing that hap­pened was that they were in­vit­ed to a meet­ing with the po­lit­i­cal leader of the UNC. So, it’s not that some­thing end­ed be­fore it was start­ed. There was a to­tal mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tion by some to be­lieve this is some strate­gic al­liance, but it is not. That can on­ly take place if there is a MoU (Mem­o­ran­dum of Un­der­stand­ing),” Grif­fith ex­plained. 

He then re­vealed, “Very soon, how­ev­er, there is a plan for us to form a strate­gic al­liance with an MoU be­tween po­lit­i­cal par­ties to­wards us mov­ing for­ward, es­pe­cial­ly as it per­tains to the up­com­ing gen­er­al elec­tion. That is be­ing draft­ed and hope­ful­ly, the par­ties that have been meet­ing on a reg­u­lar ba­sis will agree to it so we could have one com­mon goal.” 

Grif­fith ex­pect­ed that agree­ment to be for­malised in a few days. 

COP leader Kirt Sin­nette con­firmed that the par­ty had been in talks with the NTA even when he went to the UNC head­quar­ters last week. 

On Sun­day the par­ty clar­i­fied that it had not en­tered any of­fi­cial part­ner­ship with the UNC. 

“We had an MoU with the NTA and HOPE. We were hav­ing meet­ings for a while now. So what would have tran­spired is that when the call came to me (from the UNC) say­ing they want­ed to have a dis­cus­sion, I called HOPE, they did not make up their mind on what they want­ed to do but I told them I am go­ing down there to hear what the dis­cus­sion was go­ing for­ward. And they all got a re­port on what tran­spired with the leader of the UNC,” Sin­nette ex­plained. 

He could not con­firm that an agree­ment with the NTA would be signed off this week. 

Mean­while, HOPE par­ty’s deputy leader Karen Nunez-Tesheira con­firmed her par­ty was lean­ing to­wards Grif­fith’s NTA. 

“I wouldn’t say what you heard was not true. A num­ber of things came up in be­tween, but there will be what he is putting for­ward. The date may not be set in stone, but the in­ten­tion of putting some­thing in writ­ing, that is go­ing to be ac­cept­able and hope­ful­ly hold up. But there is some­thing in the works, per­haps not this week be­cause Christ­mas is in the air, but in terms of what he’s say­ing about a con­sid­er­a­tion for an agree­ment, yes, I would say that we are mov­ing de­fin­i­tive­ly in that di­rec­tion,” Nunez-Tesheira ex­plained. 

She too con­firmed there was no of­fi­cial arrange­ment with the UNC de­spite be­ing in­vit­ed, al­beit on short no­tice, to last week’s meet­ing. 

But Phillip Alexan­der’s Pro­gres­sive Em­pow­er­ment Par­ty is still stand­ing firm with the UNC. 

“That COP’s in­ter­nal com­mu­ni­ca­tion be­tween leader and chair­man should nev­er have been in the pub­lic space, but that’s for them to iron out. The Op­po­si­tion Leader opened the door to all those who are in­ter­est­ed and are ca­pa­ble of be­ing part of a coali­tion of in­ter­ests, whether big or small. It is up to those par­ties to sort them­selves out and make their own de­ci­sions, but it is no re­flec­tion on the fu­ture of the coali­tion. We’re still at the talk stage, so peo­ple will come and peo­ple may go,” Alexan­der posit­ed. 

He re­mained of the view that a third par­ty in the elec­tion equa­tion would be noth­ing more than a nui­sance. 

Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar did not re­spond to Guardian Me­dia’s ques­tions. 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored