JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, February 28, 2025

EBC plan angers PM Rowley

... Asking returning officers about political affiliation unacceptable

by

204 days ago
20240808

Se­nior Po­lit­i­cal re­porter

Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley has slammed the Elec­tions and Bound­aries Com­mis­sion for a plan to ask re­turn­ing of­fi­cers to de­clare their po­lit­i­cal al­le­giance in or­der to qual­i­fy for these po­si­tions in fu­ture elec­tions.

How­ev­er, the EBC has stat­ed that it ob­tained le­gal ad­vice con­firm­ing it can ask ap­pli­cants for the po­si­tion of re­turn­ing of­fi­cers to de­clare whether they are mem­bers of a po­lit­i­cal par­ty.

This, af­ter Row­ley and lead­ers of oth­er po­lit­i­cal par­ties slammed state­ments by EBC chair­man Mark Ramk­er­rysingh that re­turn­ing of­fi­cers will be asked to de­clare their “par­ty al­le­giance and mem­ber­ship be­fore work­ing in polling sta­tions.”

Ramk­er­rysingh made the com­ments on Tues­day at a train­ing ses­sion on gen­er­al elec­tion cov­er­age for re­porters host­ed by the T&T Pub­lish­ers and Broad­cast­ers As­so­ci­a­tion (TTP­BA) Me­dia In­sti­tute of the Caribbean and British Coun­cil.

But for once on an is­sue, the Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment and heads of op­po­si­tion en­ti­ties were on the same page.

Tak­ing to his Face­book page, Row­ley said, “The po­si­tion of the EBC to ques­tion EBC staff about their vote is AB­SOLUTE­LY UN­AC­CEPT­ABLE. The vote in this coun­try is se­cret and no per­son in pub­lic em­ploy­ment must be forced to re­veal how he or she vot­ed or in­tend to vote.”

He added, “Re­turn­ing of­fi­cers are not to com­ply with this strange and dis­turb­ing de­vel­op­ment at the EBC.

“The PNM, which has not been con­sult­ed on this mat­ter, is res­olute­ly op­posed to this un­nec­es­sary and pos­si­bly il­le­gal ac­tion. Where did this come from?”

How­ev­er, in a state­ment yes­ter­day evening, the EBC is­sued a state­ment clar­i­fy­ing Ramk­er­rysingh’s state­ment and its po­si­tion.

It said, “The Com­mis­sion would like to clar­i­fy that re­cent me­dia re­ports sug­gest­ing that the EBC is ask­ing re­turn­ing of­fi­cers to de­clare their po­lit­i­cal al­le­giance are mis­lead­ing and in­ac­cu­rate.”

The EBC ex­plained that dur­ing Tues­day’s me­dia work­shop, Ramk­er­rysingh ad­dressed a ques­tion raised about po­ten­tial po­lit­i­cal af­fil­i­a­tions of re­turn­ing of­fi­cers.

“The EBC has re­ceived al­le­ga­tions from var­i­ous po­lit­i­cal par­ties about re­turn­ing of­fi­cers be­ing mem­bers of po­lit­i­cal par­ties. To ad­dress these con­cerns and safe­guard the in­tegri­ty of the elec­toral process, the com­mis­sion sought le­gal ad­vice on re­quir­ing ap­pli­cants for the po­si­tion of re­turn­ing of­fi­cer to de­clare whether they are a mem­ber of a po­lit­i­cal par­ty.

“The le­gal opin­ion con­firmed that such an in­quiry is both ad­vis­able and law­ful. It dis­tin­guish­es be­tween de­clar­ing whether one is a mem­ber of a po­lit­i­cal par­ty and dis­clos­ing vot­ing pref­er­ences, which is pro­tect­ed by the prin­ci­ple of se­cret bal­lot. Mem­ber­ship in a po­lit­i­cal par­ty im­plies a lev­el of al­le­giance or af­fil­i­a­tion that could po­ten­tial­ly cre­ate the per­cep­tion of bias or ap­par­ent bias.

“The EBC em­pha­sis­es its com­mit­ment to im­par­tial­i­ty and trans­paren­cy in the elec­toral process. Re­quir­ing ap­pli­cants to de­clare their mem­ber­ship is a proac­tive step to mit­i­gate po­ten­tial con­flicts of in­ter­est and main­tain pub­lic con­fi­dence in the elec­toral sys­tem... The fo­cus re­mains on en­sur­ing that the elec­toral process is free, fair, and cred­i­ble.”

UNC leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar didn’t re­spond to calls yes­ter­day.

But UNC chair­man Dave Tan­coo said, “There are ob­vi­ous con­sti­tu­tion­al is­sues in­volved in ask­ing for or mak­ing em­ploy­ment de­ci­sions based on peo­ple’s po­lit­i­cal as­so­ci­a­tions.”

On EBC’s sub­se­quent state­ment, Tan­coo added, “Ques­tions emerge: is the EBC go­ing to hire or de­ny em­ploy­ment to some­one sole­ly on the ba­sis of par­ty mem­ber­ship? Would the ex­ec­u­tive man­age­ment and com­mis­sion­ers be held to the same yard­stick? Who is the lawyer used by the EBC and at what cost? One re­calls an ac­tion tak­en by the EBC on an elec­tion day that was de­ter­mined in the court to be il­le­gal.”

Bad move say HOPE, NTA lead­ers

HOPE deputy leader Tim­o­thy Hamel-Smith said he didn’t see the EBC’s move re­gard­ing re­turn­ing of­fi­cers de­clar­ing their po­lit­i­cal al­le­giance as a good one and agreed with the Prime Min­is­ter.

“It’s a ter­ri­ble de­ci­sion. It can open the door to a lot of com­pli­ca­tions. What hap­pens if they de­clare their in­ter­est and a par­ty that lost takes the is­sues to court, would the courts in­fer that the RO wasn’t as ob­jec­tive as they should have been?”

He added, “It’s a recipe for trou­ble, we al­ready have pol­i­tics di­vid­ed by race, peo­ple as­sum­ing Afro-T&T cit­i­zens are for PNM and In­do-T&T ones sup­port UNC. Where the is­sue is re­lat­ed to democ­ra­cy - your vote is se­cret, pri­vate, anony­mous. Vot­ing is a ba­sic fun­da­men­tal right al­lowed un­der the Con­sti­tu­tion. If you im­pose on the RO the need to de­clare their in­ter­est to a par­ty, wouldn’t that breach their right to en­ti­tle­ment of a se­cret, pri­vate vote?”

Hamel-Smith said EBC’s clar­i­fi­ca­tion raised more ques­tions than an­swers, since the clar­i­fi­ca­tion on­ly ref­er­enced ask­ing an ap­pli­cant for the post of re­turn­ing of­fi­cer whether they be­long to a par­ty and it stat­ed that per­sons who do will not be en­gaged. He said EBC should rather al­low par­ties to have more over­sight in the process.

NTA leader Gary Grif­fith said the move pos­es sig­nif­i­cant risks to cit­i­zens’ con­sti­tu­tion­al rights and doesn’t ef­fec­tive­ly ad­dress the core is­sues of elec­toral in­tegri­ty and im­par­tial­i­ty.

He said hold­ing a po­lit­i­cal be­lief does not in­her­ent­ly lead to bias or mis­con­duct in ful­fill­ing one’s du­ties and ask­ing ROs to de­clare their po­lit­i­cal al­le­giances is un­like­ly to solve con­cerns about im­par­tial­i­ty in the elec­toral process.

Fol­low­ing EBC’s clar­i­fi­ca­tion yes­ter­day, Grif­fith said he un­der­stood the com­mis­sion is try­ing to en­sure im­par­tial­i­ty and pre­vent bias - but felt they were go­ing about it the wrong way.

“The on­ly way the EBC will know if some­one is a par­ty mem­ber is if they get the da­ta from the po­lit­i­cal par­ties and ob­vi­ous­ly, no par­ty will give the EBC their reg­is­tered mem­ber­ship list - that’s con­fi­den­tial,” he said.

Grif­fith said the best way to en­sure trans­paren­cy in the vot­ing process is bring­ing in in­de­pen­dent ob­servers and to have elec­tron­ic sys­tems which could de­tect rig­ging.

An­a­lyst: Let’s be clear on what was said

Po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Dr Bish­nu Ra­goonath said he at­tend­ed Tues­day’s me­dia work­shop when EBC chair­man Mark Ramk­er­rysingh’s state­ment was made.

Ra­goonath said one should be clear on what was said and what’s sug­gest­ed, not­ing what was said was that re­turn­ing of­fi­cers are go­ing to be re­quired to de­clare whether they are mem­bers of any po­lit­i­cal par­ty.

“It didn’t say, ‘who you’re vot­ing for’, it just said if you’re a reg­is­tered mem­ber of a po­lit­i­cal par­ty,” Ra­goonath added.

He said what wasn’t said is if the in­for­ma­tion would be in the pub­lic do­main or kept pri­vate by the EBC.

Ra­goonath said the EBC chair­man didn’t say in the fo­rum why he de­cid­ed to go down that road. He said there are sev­er­al ex­am­ples of pos­si­ble rea­sons that could cause it. That in­clud­ed the Venezue­lan elec­tion, prob­lems with Guyana’s elec­tions and com­plaints in T&T in the past by some on get­ting reg­is­tered as a can­di­date.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored