JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

Ex-PSA boss against Colm’s public accounts audit probe

by

Dareece Polo
305 days ago
20240514
Former Public Services Association boss Clyde Weatherhead

Former Public Services Association boss Clyde Weatherhead

For­mer Pub­lic Ser­vices As­so­ci­a­tion head Clyde Weath­er­head is crit­i­cis­ing the in­ter­nal probe or­dered by Min­is­ter of Fi­nance Colm Im­bert in­to the 2023 pub­lic ac­counts fi­as­co.

Weath­er­head weighed in on the im­broglio on CNC3’s The Morn­ing Brew yes­ter­day, say­ing the im­passe be­tween Im­bert, At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Regi­nald Ar­mour, and Au­di­tor Gen­er­al Jai­wantie Ram­dass should nev­er have de­scend­ed in­to pre-ac­tion pro­to­col let­ters and law­suits.

His com­ment came a day af­ter Ram­dass sent a sec­ond pre-ac­tion pro­to­col let­ter to Im­bert, de­mand­ing that he can­cel the in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to what led to the un­der­state­ment of $2.6 bil­lion in the Au­di­tor Gen­er­al’s 2023 re­port.

This fol­lows Ram­dass’ first pre-ac­tion let­ter on April 28 ac­cus­ing the Min­istry of Fi­nance of at­tempt­ing to back­date the dis­put­ed ac­counts—a claim Im­bert has de­nied. She al­so took um­brage with both Im­bert’s and Ar­mour’s pub­lic com­ments on the mat­ter.

Com­ment­ing on the pub­lic spat, Weath­er­head in­sist­ed that this rais­es ques­tions about prop­er gov­er­nance, as he ac­cused both Im­bert and Ar­mour of “walk­ing dan­ger­ous­ly close” to di­rect­ing an in­de­pen­dent of­fice­hold­er.

He was speak­ing specif­i­cal­ly to Im­bert’s re­quest that Ram­dass up­date the ac­counts dur­ing the im­broglio. Im­bert told Par­lia­ment about the un­der­re­port­ed funds on April 26, not­ing that Ram­dass ini­tial­ly de­clined to ac­cept the ac­counts, re­vised her de­ci­sion and still did not up­date her fig­ures.

Fur­ther­more, when Ram­dass asked the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al for a le­gal opin­ion on Sec­tions 24 and 25 of the Ex­che­quer and Au­dit Act which speaks to the time­line for the Au­di­tor Gen­er­al to re­ceive ac­counts from the Trea­sury, and what hap­pens in place of that, he told her he could not ad­vise her since he was al­ready in­struct­ing the Fi­nance Min­is­ter in the mat­ter.

Weath­er­head views this as med­dling.

“The Con­sti­tu­tion, when it says that of­fice is in­de­pen­dent, it says that the Au­di­tor Gen­er­al is not to be di­rect­ed by any­body, any hu­man be­ing or any in­sti­tu­tion in the per­for­mance of her con­sti­tu­tion­al du­ties. So, at that point they were walk­ing that dan­ger­ous line,” he said.

“If the AG re­ceived a re­quest for an opin­ion on the law, why he didn’t sim­ply say ‘Well look, I’m ad­vis­ing the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance, why don’t we sit and dis­cuss the law?’ Or pro­vide them with sep­a­rate opin­ions?”

He said this in­ci­dent had sparked mis­trust among the pop­u­la­tion over the na­tion’s fi­nances and sug­gest­ed that the Pres­i­dent should have or­dered the probe.

“When you talk about white-col­lar crime, here’s the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance say­ing he now has an in­ter­nal in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to an au­dit which is on­go­ing be­cause he ex­tend­ed the time by car­ry­ing a mo­tion to Par­lia­ment. With that ex­tend­ed time the au­dit is con­tin­u­ing, so how are you in­ves­ti­gat­ing an au­dit? How are you au­dit­ing an au­dit?” he quipped.

“And he says this is an in­ter­nal in­ves­ti­ga­tion. First of all, you’re us­ing ex­ter­nal peo­ple. Sec­ond­ly, you are in­ves­ti­gat­ing the Cen­tral Bank be­cause you want to know, in terms of ref­er­ence, how did this prob­lem arise with the Cen­tral Bank, which you say is what caused the un­der­state­ment of the rev­enue. You want to in­ves­ti­gate the of­fi­cers of your own min­istry, who you call of­fi­cials, and you want to in­ves­ti­gate the Au­di­tor Gen­er­al. How is that in­ter­nal? Is the Cen­tral Bank in­ter­nal to your min­istry? Is the Au­di­tor Gen­er­al in­ter­nal to your min­istry? It is the Pres­i­dent, who ap­points these peo­ple, who must es­tab­lish a tri­bunal, not the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance and the Cab­i­net.”

Last week, for­mer Cen­tral Bank gov­er­nor Win­ston Dook­er­an al­so said he was not in sup­port of the probe and not­ed that this im­broglio had caused mis­trust among the pop­u­la­tion about the coun­try’s fi­nan­cial man­age­ment. He added that there was al­so a mis­un­der­stand­ing among those in­volved as it re­lates to their re­spec­tive roles and func­tions.

Con­tact­ed for com­ment on the lat­est pre-ac­tion pro­to­col let­ter from Ram­dass yes­ter­day, Im­bert not­ed that the mat­ter was be­fore the court and there­fore he could not com­ment.

Mean­while, Pub­lic Ser­vice Com­mis­sion (PSC) chair­man Win­ston Rud­der said he was out of the coun­try for per­son­al rea­sons and could not re­spond at this time.

Both the Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar and the Au­di­tor Gen­er­al have ar­gued that the PSC is the on­ly agency au­tho­rised to in­ves­ti­gate the fi­as­co.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored