JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Former athlete ordered to pay $44,000 in family property dispute

by

31 days ago
20250226
Robert John Auerbach

Robert John Auerbach

Derek Achong

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

A for­mer na­tion­al ath­lete has been or­dered to re­frain from ha­rass­ing, in­tim­i­dat­ing and as­sault­ing his moth­er and sis­ter over a prop­er­ty dis­pute.

High Court Judge Joan Charles made the or­der against Robert John Auer­bach when she up­held a case brought by his sis­ter Lyn­d­say and moth­er, Mar­garet.

The dis­pute arose af­ter Auer­bach’s fa­ther, Robert George Auer­bach, died in March 2014.

Auer­bach in­her­it­ed a 25 per cent stake in his fa­ther’s com­pa­ny Auer­bach Group of Com­pa­nies, while his moth­er and sis­ter re­ceived the ma­jor­i­ty share­hold­ing.

The com­pa­ny owns sev­er­al prop­er­ties in­clud­ing a large par­cel of land at Up­per Ari­api­ta Road in St Ann’s, known as the Belle Vue Es­tate.

His moth­er and sis­ter, who were rep­re­sent­ed by at­tor­ney Om Lal­la, claimed he be­came ag­gres­sive and threat­en­ing to­wards them af­ter his fa­ther died.

In 2017, the fam­i­ly agreed that Auer­bach, who rep­re­sent­ed T&T in trap and skeet shoot­ing and won a gold medal at the 21st Cen­tral Amer­i­can and Caribbean (CAC) Games in Puer­to Ri­co in 2010, should move to an­oth­er prop­er­ty owned by them on Gas­pa­ree Is­land. He ini­tial­ly com­piled then be­gan to al­leged­ly re-en­ter the prop­er­ty.

His moth­er and sis­ter claimed that in Au­gust 2019, he en­tered the prop­er­ty and ag­gres­sive­ly de­mand­ed items from a safe room.

“He be­gan search­ing the prop­er­ty, throw­ing cush­ions, chairs, box­es and oth­er move­able prop­er­ty and in the process, phys­i­cal­ly as­sault­ed the first claimant (Lyn­d­say),” Jus­tice Charles said, as she sum­marised their case.

“On this oc­ca­sion, he broke the locks of the safe room and re­moved firearms and am­mu­ni­tion be­long­ing to his de­ceased fa­ther,” she added.

Auer­bach al­leged­ly broke in­to the prop­er­ty sev­er­al times in De­cem­ber 2020. His sis­ter claimed she was forced to lock the doors and bar­ri­cade her­self in­side.

“The de­fen­dant then peeped through a ‘dog door’ in the kitchen door and threat­ened her that he was an es­tate con­sta­ble, pre­cept­ed and threat­ened to ar­rest him if she came out,” Jus­tice Charles said.

Al­though the fam­i­ly made a re­port to then-po­lice com­mis­sion­er Gary Grif­fith, Auer­bach al­leged­ly re­turned days lat­er and threat­ened a long-serv­ing mem­ber of staff. His moth­er and sis­ter sought an in­junc­tion against him, which was grant­ed by Jus­tice Charles.

In ear­ly 2021, the T&T Po­lice Ser­vice (TTPS) wrote to the rel­a­tives in­form­ing them that their re­ports were be­ing in­ves­ti­gat­ed by the Bel­mont Po­lice Sta­tion.

His moth­er and sis­ter still pur­sued a sub­stan­tive law­suit against him al­though he ful­ly com­plied with the in­junc­tion.

Auer­bach de­nied any wrong­do­ing and claimed that he was not a per­sis­tent nui­sance, the ag­gres­sor or some­one who was un­hinged.

He claimed his sis­ter had phys­i­cal­ly as­sault­ed him in the past and was re­spon­si­ble for his evic­tion from the fam­i­ly home. He al­so claimed he had a strained re­la­tion­ship with his moth­er and sis­ter as they were jeal­ous of the close re­la­tion­ship he had with his fa­ther.

He said he was forced to en­ter the St Ann’s prop­er­ty to re­trieve equip­ment for his busi­ness which he stored there. He al­so claimed the items he sought in the house, in­clud­ing a pair of his­toric can­nons that went miss­ing, were be­queathed to him by his fa­ther due to his prowess as a marks­man.

He al­so al­leged that the law­suit was a ploy by his fam­i­ly to “strong-arm” him in­to ac­cept­ing a sig­nif­i­cant­ly un­der­val­ued of­fer for his stake in the fam­i­ly com­pa­ny.

In de­cid­ing the case, Jus­tice Charles not­ed that Auer­bach’s moth­er re­fused to tes­ti­fy in the case against her son.

“The above pro­vides a rea­son­able ex­pla­na­tion as to why the sec­ond claimant would not want to tes­ti­fy against her son who har­boured feel­ings of an­i­mos­i­ty against her as shown by his own ev­i­dence and plead­ings,” she said.

Jus­tice Charles up­held the claims made by Auer­bach’s sis­ter and moth­er.

“The de­fen­dant, by his ac­tions, which were not de­nied, demon­strat­ed a con­cern­ing de­gree of in­sta­bil­i­ty in that he was pre­pared to take the law in­to his own hands rather than seek the in­ter­ven­tion of the courts to de­ter­mine the dis­pute with the Claimants,” she said.

Re­fer­ring to his dis­pute over the can­nons, which he claimed were re­moved and buried on the in­struc­tions of his rel­a­tives, Jus­tice Charles said: “His be­hav­iour was demon­stra­bly un­rea­son­able and er­rat­ic con­cern­ing this mat­ter.”

She grant­ed an or­der re­strain­ing Auer­bach from at­tack­ing his moth­er and sis­ter and en­ter­ing the St Ann’s prop­er­ty.

He was al­so barred from re­mov­ing items from the prop­er­ty be­sides his equip­ment for his busi­ness, which he would need to give ad­e­quate no­tice of.

Auer­bach was al­so or­dered to pay his moth­er and sis­ter $30,000 in com­pen­sa­tion for as­sault and bat­tery and $14,000 in le­gal costs for the case.

Auer­bach was rep­re­sent­ed by Ken­neth Shawn Ma­hase and Van­dana Ben­ny. His moth­er and sis­ter were al­so rep­re­sent­ed by Aaron Morales.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored