Senior Reporter
otto.carrington@cnc3.co.tt
Former United National Congress (UNC) councillor for Kelly Village Samuel Sankar says he is still open to serving. Earlier this week Sankar announced that he resigned from the UNC but will continue to serve out his term as an independent. This, even as legal experts state that the Privy Council’s May 18 ruling on local government makes it clear that councillors and aldermen no longer have the authority to hold office in the regional and city corporations.
The Privy Council’s ruling invalidated the Government’s attempt to extend the term of local government representatives by a year.
Speaking to Guardian Media, Sankar said, “I took a decision and I stood my ground and that was putting country first and serving my burgesses where that was always and has always been my priority. That was my number one goal, to serve the people. And that is where I am. I stand here today against that background.”
Sankar came into the spotlight after being the only UNC councillor to attend a Local Government Reform symposium and consultations hosted by the Ministry of Rural Development and Local Government in August last year after Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissesar had called on councillors, mayors, and aldermen from her party to boycott the consultations.
The Kelly Village councillor made it clear that he has no intention of crossing the floor to another party at this time.
“I am here to serve the people, and you know, if that opportunity presents itself in nation-building and serving the country, yes, that is something I would consider, but as of now, I’m not in ... I’ve not screened for any local government position,” he said.
Recounting that Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley had said that one should not fall in love with the office, he added, “I’m here today. I’ve given seven years of my time and talent towards local government.”
Sankar said that he hopes to see Local Government reform, “I long for the day when reform would come and kick in, and people could appreciate where the goods and services could go down to the people who need it.”
He said talks about reform have been around since the 1990s. “It’s 23 years, 21 to 23 years now, and finally, we see the light at the end of the tunnel, and there is so much drama in it. If you call an election now, what happens? Who is going to execute it? And that’s the challenge we have in local government and most of the agencies, execution is a problem. Folks do not even understand the dynamics.”