JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, February 23, 2025

Young escapes Privileges Committee, apologises to Parliament

by

Dareece Polo
128 days ago
20241018

En­er­gy Min­is­ter and Port-of-Spain North/St Ann’s West MP Stu­art Young nar­row­ly es­caped the Priv­i­leges Com­mit­tee last evening, af­ter be­ing in­struct­ed by House Speak­er Bridgid An­nisette-George to apol­o­gise to the Par­lia­ment for his “crass” com­ment to­wards Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar last Thurs­day.

Dur­ing the Stand­ing Fi­nance Com­mit­tee (SFC) de­bate in Par­lia­ment, Young was caught by a “hot” mi­cro­phone us­ing ob­scene lan­guage and im­ply­ing that Per­sad-Bisses­sar was leav­ing the cham­ber to per­form a sex­u­al act in the toi­let.

He fur­ther sug­gest­ed that Cou­va North MP Ravi Rati­ram would “run girls” for UNC MPs in the back­room of the Red House, say­ing he could no longer use PTSC bus­es for that pur­pose. Rati­ram was in­ves­ti­gat­ed by the PTSC in 2012 for al­leged mis­be­hav­iour in of­fice but no ev­i­dence was found to take to the po­lice.

Young was alert­ed to the mi­cro­phone be­ing on by Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert. Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Min­is­ter Symon De No­bri­ga was al­so snick­er­ing on the back bench. Health Min­is­ter Ter­rence Deyals­ingh at­tempt­ed to ad­mon­ish his col­league, but Young re­tort­ed that he (Deyals­ingh) should not call his name.

At the end of yes­ter­day’s SFC, which saw the 2025 Bud­get be­ing passed, the House Speak­er con­vened the sit­ting of the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives and said she was com­pelled to ad­dress Par­lia­ment on the wide­ly pub­li­cised mat­ter, which brought the House in­to odi­um and dis­re­pute.

Slam­ming Young’s com­ments as deroga­to­ry, ho­mo­pho­bic and misog­y­nis­tic, An­nisette-George said she did not hear it when it was made, as she was re­plac­ing Deputy House Speak­er Ed­mond Forde at the time. How­ev­er, she said de­spite it be­ing ac­ci­den­tal­ly broad­cast­ed, it was not ex­cus­able.

“Mem­bers, if we are con­scious of our roles as lead­ers in so­ci­ety, we would un­der­stand that the re­marks were even more dam­ag­ing giv­en their misog­y­nis­tic and ho­mo­pho­bic char­ac­ter, as well as their crim­i­nal in­sin­u­a­tions. As a woman, I am nat­u­ral­ly led to con­demn state­ments which seek to in­de­cent­ly por­tray an­oth­er woman; state­ments which triv­i­alise crim­i­nal ac­tiv­i­ties which ex­ploit women, or state­ments which im­pute im­prop­er con­duct on the part of oth­er mem­bers,” An­nisette-George told the House.

“It mat­ters not that the Mem­ber for Port-of-Spain North/St Ann’s West was not di­rect­ly mak­ing a con­tri­bu­tion. It mat­ters not that those de­plorable words were ut­tered sot­to voce but un­wit­ting­ly cap­tured by an open mi­cro­phone. It mat­ters not that the ut­ter­ances of the Mem­ber for Port-of-Spain North/St Ann’s West were not cap­tured by Hansard. The in­con­tro­vert­ible fact is that those re­marks, which may have been in­tend­ed to be in­audi­ble in cer­tain parts of the Cham­ber, have now been heard across the coun­try, as a re­flec­tion of the Mem­bers of this House, and in par­tic­u­lar the Mem­ber for Port-of- Spain North/St Ann’s West. A re­flec­tion that di­min­ish­es the dig­ni­ty of this House and, in par­tic­u­lar the Mem­ber.”

An­nisette-George de­mand­ed an apol­o­gy and with­draw­al of the un­par­lia­men­tary lan­guage. She said while Young apol­o­gised on so­cial me­dia, it was not sat­is­fac­to­ry.

“I have tak­en note that there is cir­cu­lat­ing in the pub­lic do­main a state­ment akin to an apol­o­gy at­trib­ut­able to the Mem­ber of Port-of-Spain North/St Ann’s West... I am of the view that it does not sat­is­fy that which is re­quired of him to purge him­self of his de­spi­ca­ble be­hav­iour in this House.”

Young was not the on­ly MP to be crit­i­cised on the Gov­ern­ment bench, as those who did not stop him al­so re­ceived An­nisette-George’s ire.

“Any mem­ber who ac­tive­ly par­tic­i­pat­ed in, sup­port­ed or pas­sive­ly en­cour­aged such crass dis­course has al­so failed in this du­ty (to up­hold the stand­ing or­ders) and can­not es­cape the fo­cus of this rep­ri­mand. Thank­ful­ly, one neigh­bour­ing mem­ber rose to the high­est tra­di­tions ex­pect­ed of mem­bers of this House by show­ing his dis­dain for what he heard,” she said as she hint­ed at Deyals­ingh’s re­sponse.

Mo­tion to send Young

to Priv­i­leges Com­mit­tee  

Im­me­di­ate­ly af­ter the House Speak­er’s re­quest that Young apol­o­gise to the House, Pointe-a-Pierre MP and UNC Chief Whip David Lee re­quest­ed that a mo­tion of priv­i­lege be brought against him.

“The words/state­ments by the mem­ber against the Op­po­si­tion MPs and the Op­po­si­tion Leader were vul­gar and misog­y­nis­tic which, from their plain and or­di­nary mean­ing and/or im­pu­ta­tion, were suf­fi­cient to bring this House in­to odi­um, con­tempt or ridicule by low­er­ing its au­thor­i­ty,” he said.

Lee re­quest­ed that Young be re­ferred to the Priv­i­leges Com­mit­tee based on the breach of par­lia­men­tary priv­i­lege by his use of ob­scene, of­fen­sive and in­sult­ing lan­guage, which amount­ed to con­tempt of the House. He said this was com­pound­ed be­cause the state­ments brought the House in­to odi­um, con­tempt or ridicule.

Young’s apol­o­gy to House  

Ad­dress­ing Deputy Speak­er Es­mond Forde af­ter An­nisette-George left the cham­ber, Young be­gan his apol­o­gy, once again ad­mit­ting that he utilised col­lo­qui­al terms that were un­par­lia­men­tary.

He took full re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for his ac­tions and ut­ter­ances, in­sist­ing that it was nev­er his in­ten­tion to em­bar­rass Par­lia­ment.

“I take full re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for my ac­tions and ut­ter­ances and would like to record my hum­blest apol­o­gy to the House, the mem­bers of the House and to the pop­u­la­tion whom I rep­re­sent for my in­dis­cre­tion and the en­su­ing dis­tur­bance that my words have caused. I as­sure you, Mr Deputy Speak­er, and those that I am priv­i­leged to rep­re­sent that it is nev­er my in­ten­tion to bring odi­um to this au­gust House and the Par­lia­ment which I will al­ways do my best to pro­tect.”

He added, “In the cir­cum­stances, I with­draw the un­par­lia­men­tary lan­guage and I ask that my un­re­served apol­o­gy for the said ut­ter­ances be record­ed and I con­clude by reaf­firm­ing my com­mit­ment to the Par­lia­ment and the peo­ple of the Re­pub­lic of Trinidad and To­ba­go.”

Dur­ing his apol­o­gy, he did not men­tion Per­sad-Bisses­sar specif­i­cal­ly.

Deputy House Speak­er’s rul­ing 

Fol­low­ing the apol­o­gy, Forde said he had con­sid­ered the cir­cum­stances and ex­am­ined the per­son­al ex­pla­na­tion made by Young.

“As we all heard, the mem­ber has un­re­served­ly apol­o­gised for his be­hav­iour and with­drawn his un­par­lia­men­tary com­ments. By apol­o­gis­ing, the min­is­ter has demon­strat­ed re­morse for his com­ments, reaf­firmed his com­mit­ment to the val­ues and norms which ob­tain in this House and re­ject­ed his pre­vi­ous be­hav­iour which fell far be­neath what is ex­pect­ed as a mem­ber of Par­lia­ment,” he said.

“Ho­n­ourable mem­bers, I am sure you would agree with me that it would be be­neath the dig­ni­ty of this House not to ac­cept the apol­o­gy of the ho­n­ourable mem­ber for Port-of-Spain North/St Ann’s West. I there­fore rule that the mat­ter re­ferred to me by the mem­ber for Point-a-Pierre does not war­rant any fur­ther ac­tion by this House or its priv­i­leges com­mit­tee,” he added.

Forde con­clud­ed by urg­ing all mem­bers to up­hold the dig­ni­ty of the House.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored