JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Fuad Khan bows out of politics

by

Chester Sambrano
1955 days ago
20191109

A sec­ond long-time mem­ber of the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC), Barataria MP Dr Fuad Khan, is bow­ing out of pol­i­tics.

This fol­lows the pre­vi­ous an­nounce­ment by Tabaquite MP Dr Su­ru­jrat­tan Ram­bachan who said he was not seek­ing re­elec­tion. Who's next?

In an ex­clu­sive in­ter­view with Guardian Me­dia, Khan on Thurs­day said he had had enough.

“I’ve had enough af­ter 25 years, it is not an easy place to be. I have lapsed in my ser­vice to the con­stituen­cy," he said.

Khan sug­gest­ed that a younger per­son would have more en­er­gy to ser­vice the con­stituen­cy.

He said he has been go­ing full time with the role as an MP and doc­tor, and it was “dif­fi­cult to ride two hard hors­es.”

Khan said a per­son must know when it is time to go and to make room for younger, more en­er­getic rep­re­sen­ta­tives.

Con­cern­ing his re­la­tion­ship with the par­ty, he said that every­thing was good and it was a per­son­al de­ci­sion.

Just months ago, in Au­gust, Ram­bachan an­nounced his de­ci­sion to re­tire from ac­tive pol­i­tics af­ter 30 years of ser­vice.

At a UNC meet­ing at the Gas­par­il­lo Sec­ondary School, he said while he was priv­i­leged to serve he had in­ter­nal squab­bles with­in the par­ty.

"I have had my bat­tles with the lead­er­ship, with our po­lit­i­cal leader, with col­leagues, but I have al­ways tried to fight in­side not in the pub­lic. I be­lieve that con­ver­sa­tions lead to con­ver­sion and that pol­i­tics is still about the art of com­pro­mise with­out re­lin­quish­ing with your es­sen­tial life val­ues. "

He said then that leav­ing of­fice was in­evitable.

"You must al­so be pre­pared to move on if the dis­agree­ments are be­yond com­pro­mise. I want to as­sure you that my de­ci­sion to re­de­fine my role in the pol­i­tics of my coun­try and more par­tic­u­lar­ly in the fu­ture of my par­ty has noth­ing to do with dis­af­fec­tion or dis­ap­point­ments in my leader nor of any fun­da­men­tal dif­fer­ences with my col­leagues.”

In June of this year, there were ru­mours of a pos­si­ble vote of no-con­fi­dence in Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar as the po­lit­i­cal leader of the UNC head­ing in­to the next gen­er­al elec­tion, but those po­lit­i­cal fires were quick­ly put out by the last per­son to chal­lenge her for the post, Oropouche East MP Dr Roodal Mooni­lal.

He re­port­ed­ly said that "there would be no mo­tion of no con­fi­dence in Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar, ei­ther as op­po­si­tion leader or po­lit­i­cal leader or any leader…That mat­ter can­not and does not arise. Per­sad-Bisses­sar in­deed has the sup­port of all MPs, notwith­stand­ing any re­cent rip­ple.”

The talk of the mo­tion arose af­ter Ch­agua­nas West MP Gan­ga Singh broke ranks and vot­ed with the Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment (PNM) Gov­ern­ment on the pen­sion clause of the Mis­cel­la­neous Pro­vi­sions Bill in Par­lia­ment.

Af­ter the vote, he told Guardian Me­dia, "My con­science is clear. I'm an­chored on prin­ci­ple. The UNC must stay true to the vi­sion and prin­ci­ples by which it held Gov­ern­ment in the past if it's to re­main a true al­ter­na­tive to the present ad­min­is­tra­tion.”

Guardian Me­dia sought to find out from MP Singh whether he will be of­fer­ing up him­self for re-elec­tion for the UNC but he said at this time he was “un­de­cid­ed.”

But the shape of the UNC is al­ready chang­ing with the emer­gence of younger faces like Ani­ta Haynes, Sean Sobers, Sad­dam Ho­sein, Tahar­ka Obi­ka and Rishi Tri­pathi rep­re­sent­ing the par­ty at the lev­el of the Sen­ate.

Con­tact­ed re­gard­ing the rev­e­la­tion by Fuad Khan, UNC Pub­lic Re­la­tions Of­fi­cer Ani­ta Haynes said she was un­aware of his de­ci­sion but could not say whether he had spo­ken to any­one else in the hi­er­ar­chy of the par­ty.

She said she wouldn’t con­sid­er Khan’s de­par­ture from elec­toral pol­i­tics as a blow to the par­ty be­cause “choos­ing not to go back up for a seat does not mean that there isn’t a space for men­tor­ship.”

She ex­pressed con­fi­dence that the par­ty can still strike the right bal­ance of youth and ex­pe­ri­ence in the Par­lia­ment even if more se­nior mem­bers de­cid­ed to bow out as well.

“If your vi­sion and the vi­sion of the po­lit­i­cal par­ty that you are a part of is to say we have to in­clude more per­sons then cer­tain peo­ple who would have had years of ser­vice would opt to make a gra­cious ex­it out of the par­lia­men­tary pol­i­tics and make that space.”

She, how­ev­er, made it clear that while there has been a call for new blood no­body has been “pushed out.”

She said the work of both Khan and Ram­bachan to the par­ty and coun­try can­not be un­der­stat­ed.

Haynes said at this time she was un­aware of any oth­er mem­bers in­di­cat­ing in­ten­tions not to re­con­test seats in the 2020 elec­tion on be­half of the UNC.

See page A6—Fuad picks health­care in front of pol­i­tics


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored