JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, March 6, 2025

HDC refused to act on Greenvale signs

by

Sharlene Rampersad
2314 days ago
20181103

The Hous­ing De­vel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion (HDC) re­ceived a drainage de­sign rec­om­men­da­tion from an ex­ter­nal com­pa­ny just one day be­fore the Oc­to­ber 19 floods hit Green­vale Park, La Hor­quet­ta.

On Fri­day, HDC chair­man New­man George said in No­vem­ber 2017, the HDC had tried to find a so­lu­tion to the po­ten­tial flood­ing at Green­vale. He con­firmed the com­pa­ny knew the area had the po­ten­tial to flood and was look­ing for so­lu­tions since he took of­fice in 2015.

In re­sponse to ques­tions from the Sun­day Guardian on Fri­day, George said the HDC was try­ing to make up­grades to the site to avoid flood­ing in fu­ture.

“We knew there was a po­ten­tial prob­lem there when I went in as board chair­man in 2015,” George said.

“In 2017 I start­ed to look at so­lu­tions to this prob­lem, in Ju­ly 2017 we sent out pro­pos­als ask­ing in­vi­ta­tions to ten­der for pro­vi­sion of drainage de­sign con­sul­tan­cy for HDC Green­vale Park.”

George said the con­tract was grant­ed to Al­pha En­gi­neer­ing on No­vem­ber 6, 2017, to pro­vide drainage de­sign con­sul­tan­cy. Al­pha’s rec­om­men­da­tions were sent to HDC on Oc­to­ber 18, the day be­fore the floods.

“Al­pha did a drainage de­sign and a hy­dro­log­i­cal sur­vey of the area and they made cer­tain rec­om­men­da­tions about what is to be done to al­le­vi­ate the flood­ing,” George said.

He said the HDC is now hope­ful those rec­om­men­da­tions will be im­ple­ment­ed in ear­ly 2019, well be­fore the start of the next rainy sea­son.

But George could not say how much those rec­om­men­da­tions would cost the HDC.

“We are now in the process of look­ing at the rec­om­men­da­tions to have it de­signed and cost­ed,” he said.

He said the HDC has been try­ing to make Green­vale live­able again by as­sist­ing res­i­dents with re­pair works to their homes and re­pair­ing dam­age done to elec­tri­cal in­fra­struc­ture dur­ing the re­cent flood­ing.

On Fri­day, Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley al­so pre­sent­ed a 2010 re­port by Trin­i­ty Hous­ing Ltd which talked about mit­i­gat­ing the flood­ing in the area. Row­ley said the then Peo­ple’s Part­ner­ship gov­ern­ment did noth­ing with the in­for­ma­tion.

The con­tracts

Con­struc­tion of the Green­vale units was un­der­tak­en by two con­trac­tors—Mooti­lal Ramhit and Sons and Trin­i­ty Hous­ing—at a to­tal cost of $234 mil­lion.

When the con­tracts were fi­nalised in 2015, the Green­vale de­vel­op­ment had a cost over­run of $80 mil­lion, bring­ing the to­tal con­tract sum paid to $314 mil­lion.

The con­tracts were award­ed in May, 2008 at the rate of $315 per square foot to both con­trac­tors. At an HDC Ten­ders’ Com­mit­tee meet­ing on Sep­tem­ber 17, 2008, the rate was in­creased to $379.24 per square foot based on in­creas­es to the price of ma­te­ri­als, an in­ter­nal as­sess­ment and a quan­ti­ty sur­vey­or as­sess­ment and cor­rec­tions to the prices of some items on the con­tract.

The com­mit­tee de­cid­ed then to pay Ramhit $137 mil­lion for the con­struc­tion of 416 hous­es in Green­vale. The project was done in two phas­es—Phase 1 was the con­struc­tion of 38 du­plex units, 126 sin­gle fam­i­ly units, eight two-storey bun­ga­lows, 14 two-storey res­i­den­tial units and eight two-storey res­i­den­tial-com­mer­i­cal units. Phase 2 was the con­struc­tion of 44 du­plex units, 108 sin­gle fam­i­ly units, 33 two-storey bun­ga­lows and six two-storey res­i­den­tial/com­mer­cial unit.

But Ramhit was un­able to build 41 of the units be­cause squat­ters were oc­cu­py­ing the land.

At that same meet­ing, af­ter sim­i­lar ad­just­ments were made to a con­tract award­ed to Trin­i­ty in May 2008, the HDC agreed to pay Trin­i­ty $97 mil­lion to con­struct 239 hous­ing units.

From the 557 units that were built, 348 of those were flat hous­es.

Both projects had been start­ed in May, 2008 and were ex­pect­ed to be com­plet­ed with­in 24 months.

Ac­cord­ing to the sum­ma­ry sta­tis­tics of Ramhit’s con­tract for the Green­vale project, the com­ple­tion date was June, 2015. But the cost

for the 416 hous­ing units had bal­looned from its orig­i­nal $137 mil­lion to over $175 mil­lion. From that in­crease, $17 mil­lion was iden­ti­fied as hav­ing been used for vari­a­tions in in­fra­struc­ture.

In the sum­ma­ry sta­tis­tics of Trin­i­ty’s con­tract, the com­ple­tion date was al­so June, 2015 and their price for con­struc­tion of 239 hous­ing units had in­creased from $97 mil­lion to over $139 mil­lion. Trin­i­ty cit­ed a $22 mil­lion vari­a­tion in the con­tract val­ue for in­fra­struc­ture works done on the site.

Con­struc­tion with­out plans, ap­provals

At an HDC Ten­der’s Com­mit­tee meet­ing on Sep­tem­ber 17, 2008, land co­or­di­na­tor Deb­o­rah Cheesman raised sev­er­al is­sues about Green­vale’s con­struc­tion, which had al­ready start­ed.

The com­mit­tee, in its min­utes, not­ed that Cheesman re­port­ed she had not seen plans for the de­vel­op­ment al­though both in­fra­struc­ture and build­ings were al­ready un­der­way.

Cheesman raised is­sues about the de­vel­op­ment plans and statu­to­ry ap­provals for the project, not­ing that the de­sign and in­fra­struc­ture plan for many of the de­vel­op­ments had not been sub­mit­ted to the HDC for sign-off.

She al­so said ar­bi­trary changes had been made dur­ing the con­struc­tion on sites. She al­so not­ed that where in­de­pen­dent con­sul­tants were hired to pre­pare de­signs for de­vel­op­ments, the de­signs were be­ing done with lit­tle or no over­sight by HDC project man­agers.

Cheesman not­ed too that the HDC would be un­able to al­lo­cate hous­es to any ben­e­fi­cia­ries be­cause there were no statu­to­ry ap­provals for the de­vel­op­ments.

No steps for flood mit­i­ga­tion

A for­mer se­nior project man­ag­er who worked on the Green­vale Park de­vel­op­ment told the Sun­day Guardian the cost of vari­ances for in­fra­struc­tur­al work was high be­cause no mit­i­ga­tion work against flood­ing in the area was done be­fore con­struc­tion start­ed.

In 2009, af­ter the hous­es were al­most all com­plet­ed, heavy rain­fall sent flood­wa­ters gush­ing in­to the de­vel­op­ment. Flood­wa­ters reached up to four feet high in some of the un­fin­ished hous­es, caus­ing tiles in many of the hous­es to fall off the walls, the source, who did not want to be iden­ti­fied, said.

“Ini­tial­ly there were no mit­i­gat­ing strate­gies be­cause, in my opin­ion, the de­signs were in­com­plete. If they had a com­plete de­sign they would have tak­en in­to con­sid­er­a­tion the flow in­to the riv­er, they would have raised the site, but they just went and start­ed build­ing, then af­ter the flood they came to put re­ten­tion ponds,” the source said.

In 2011, out­flow pumps were in­stalled around the de­vel­op­ment and a de­ci­sion was tak­en to build em­bank­ments around the de­vel­op­ment. But once again, is­sues with squat­ters put a dent in those plans.

“The next strat­e­gy was to put em­bank­ments - to em­bank the en­tire site, that was a part of their pre­vi­ous plan which we fol­lowed through be­cause of the de­sign con­sul­tants - but the em­bank­ment couldn’t be com­plet­ed on one side be­cause of the squat­ters on one side of the de­vel­op­ment and we had to go to Land Set­tle­ment Agency to get that ap­proval,” the source said.

Un­der the Peo­ple’s Part­ner­ship ad­min­is­tra­tion in 2014, then hous­ing min­is­ter Dr Roodal Mooni­lal be­gan al­lo­cat­ing hous­es in the de­vel­op­ment to HDC ap­pli­cants.

Jear­lean: Project

nev­er stopped

While Green­vale res­i­dents are con­tin­u­ing to deal with their los­es from the re­cent flood­ing dev­as­ta­tion, the po­lit­i­cal blame game is in full swing with Op­po­si­tion MP Dr Roodal Mooni­lal and Plan­ning Min­is­ter Camille Robin­son-Reg­is both point­ing fin­gers at the oth­er for in­fra­struc­tur­al woes which ul­ti­mate­ly led to the prob­lem now be­ing ex­pe­ri­enced at the hous­ing de­vel­op­ment.

Robin­son-Reg­is told CNC3 that Town and Coun­try ap­provals were sought and de­nied from 2000 to 2014 for con­struc­tion on the site. She said the Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment had halt­ed the Green­vale project be­cause of flood­ing is­sues.

But Jear­lean John, who was the HDC’s man­ag­ing di­rec­tor from 2009 to 2016, said the project was nev­er halt­ed.

“The project was nev­er halt­ed, of­fi­cial­ly or oth­er­wise. Kind­ly bear in mind if a project is to be halt­ed, that will be a de­ci­sion of the HDC board. Dur­ing my tenure there was no such de­ci­sion,” John wrote via What­sapp.

Asked how much of the Green­vale de­vel­op­ment was com­plet­ed when she took up of­fice, John wrote, “All of the hous­es were al­ready com­plet­ed when I was ap­point­ed MD.”

When the Sun­day Guardian con­tact­ed Mooni­lal, he blamed the flood­ing on fail­ure to de­silt the wa­ter re­ten­tion ponds and main­tain the pumps for the de­vel­op­ment.

“Those are meant to be cleaned and de-silt­ed every year, when we went in­to of­fice over $150 mil­lion had been spent al­ready on that project, we knew that site was poor be­cause of the drainage is­sues and be­cause they had di­vert­ed the nat­ur­al course of the riv­er, but we did what we could to re­ha­bil­i­tate the site,” Mooni­lal said.

Mooni­lal said dur­ing his tenure the ponds and pumps were main­tained reg­u­lar­ly, not­ing there was no flood­ing on the site un­til 2017.

“For three years now they have not done any clean­ing or drainage works, so it seems that they are not con­cerned with pre­vent­ing de­struc­tion in peo­ple’s homes,” he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored