The Housing Development Corporation (HDC) received a drainage design recommendation from an external company just one day before the October 19 floods hit Greenvale Park, La Horquetta.
On Friday, HDC chairman Newman George said in November 2017, the HDC had tried to find a solution to the potential flooding at Greenvale. He confirmed the company knew the area had the potential to flood and was looking for solutions since he took office in 2015.
In response to questions from the Sunday Guardian on Friday, George said the HDC was trying to make upgrades to the site to avoid flooding in future.
“We knew there was a potential problem there when I went in as board chairman in 2015,” George said.
“In 2017 I started to look at solutions to this problem, in July 2017 we sent out proposals asking invitations to tender for provision of drainage design consultancy for HDC Greenvale Park.”
George said the contract was granted to Alpha Engineering on November 6, 2017, to provide drainage design consultancy. Alpha’s recommendations were sent to HDC on October 18, the day before the floods.
“Alpha did a drainage design and a hydrological survey of the area and they made certain recommendations about what is to be done to alleviate the flooding,” George said.
He said the HDC is now hopeful those recommendations will be implemented in early 2019, well before the start of the next rainy season.
But George could not say how much those recommendations would cost the HDC.
“We are now in the process of looking at the recommendations to have it designed and costed,” he said.
He said the HDC has been trying to make Greenvale liveable again by assisting residents with repair works to their homes and repairing damage done to electrical infrastructure during the recent flooding.
On Friday, Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley also presented a 2010 report by Trinity Housing Ltd which talked about mitigating the flooding in the area. Rowley said the then People’s Partnership government did nothing with the information.
The contracts
Construction of the Greenvale units was undertaken by two contractors—Mootilal Ramhit and Sons and Trinity Housing—at a total cost of $234 million.
When the contracts were finalised in 2015, the Greenvale development had a cost overrun of $80 million, bringing the total contract sum paid to $314 million.
The contracts were awarded in May, 2008 at the rate of $315 per square foot to both contractors. At an HDC Tenders’ Committee meeting on September 17, 2008, the rate was increased to $379.24 per square foot based on increases to the price of materials, an internal assessment and a quantity surveyor assessment and corrections to the prices of some items on the contract.
The committee decided then to pay Ramhit $137 million for the construction of 416 houses in Greenvale. The project was done in two phases—Phase 1 was the construction of 38 duplex units, 126 single family units, eight two-storey bungalows, 14 two-storey residential units and eight two-storey residential-commerical units. Phase 2 was the construction of 44 duplex units, 108 single family units, 33 two-storey bungalows and six two-storey residential/commercial unit.
But Ramhit was unable to build 41 of the units because squatters were occupying the land.
At that same meeting, after similar adjustments were made to a contract awarded to Trinity in May 2008, the HDC agreed to pay Trinity $97 million to construct 239 housing units.
From the 557 units that were built, 348 of those were flat houses.
Both projects had been started in May, 2008 and were expected to be completed within 24 months.
According to the summary statistics of Ramhit’s contract for the Greenvale project, the completion date was June, 2015. But the cost
for the 416 housing units had ballooned from its original $137 million to over $175 million. From that increase, $17 million was identified as having been used for variations in infrastructure.
In the summary statistics of Trinity’s contract, the completion date was also June, 2015 and their price for construction of 239 housing units had increased from $97 million to over $139 million. Trinity cited a $22 million variation in the contract value for infrastructure works done on the site.
Construction without plans, approvals
At an HDC Tender’s Committee meeting on September 17, 2008, land coordinator Deborah Cheesman raised several issues about Greenvale’s construction, which had already started.
The committee, in its minutes, noted that Cheesman reported she had not seen plans for the development although both infrastructure and buildings were already underway.
Cheesman raised issues about the development plans and statutory approvals for the project, noting that the design and infrastructure plan for many of the developments had not been submitted to the HDC for sign-off.
She also said arbitrary changes had been made during the construction on sites. She also noted that where independent consultants were hired to prepare designs for developments, the designs were being done with little or no oversight by HDC project managers.
Cheesman noted too that the HDC would be unable to allocate houses to any beneficiaries because there were no statutory approvals for the developments.
No steps for flood mitigation
A former senior project manager who worked on the Greenvale Park development told the Sunday Guardian the cost of variances for infrastructural work was high because no mitigation work against flooding in the area was done before construction started.
In 2009, after the houses were almost all completed, heavy rainfall sent floodwaters gushing into the development. Floodwaters reached up to four feet high in some of the unfinished houses, causing tiles in many of the houses to fall off the walls, the source, who did not want to be identified, said.
“Initially there were no mitigating strategies because, in my opinion, the designs were incomplete. If they had a complete design they would have taken into consideration the flow into the river, they would have raised the site, but they just went and started building, then after the flood they came to put retention ponds,” the source said.
In 2011, outflow pumps were installed around the development and a decision was taken to build embankments around the development. But once again, issues with squatters put a dent in those plans.
“The next strategy was to put embankments - to embank the entire site, that was a part of their previous plan which we followed through because of the design consultants - but the embankment couldn’t be completed on one side because of the squatters on one side of the development and we had to go to Land Settlement Agency to get that approval,” the source said.
Under the People’s Partnership administration in 2014, then housing minister Dr Roodal Moonilal began allocating houses in the development to HDC applicants.
Jearlean: Project
never stopped
While Greenvale residents are continuing to deal with their loses from the recent flooding devastation, the political blame game is in full swing with Opposition MP Dr Roodal Moonilal and Planning Minister Camille Robinson-Regis both pointing fingers at the other for infrastructural woes which ultimately led to the problem now being experienced at the housing development.
Robinson-Regis told CNC3 that Town and Country approvals were sought and denied from 2000 to 2014 for construction on the site. She said the People’s National Movement had halted the Greenvale project because of flooding issues.
But Jearlean John, who was the HDC’s managing director from 2009 to 2016, said the project was never halted.
“The project was never halted, officially or otherwise. Kindly bear in mind if a project is to be halted, that will be a decision of the HDC board. During my tenure there was no such decision,” John wrote via Whatsapp.
Asked how much of the Greenvale development was completed when she took up office, John wrote, “All of the houses were already completed when I was appointed MD.”
When the Sunday Guardian contacted Moonilal, he blamed the flooding on failure to desilt the water retention ponds and maintain the pumps for the development.
“Those are meant to be cleaned and de-silted every year, when we went into office over $150 million had been spent already on that project, we knew that site was poor because of the drainage issues and because they had diverted the natural course of the river, but we did what we could to rehabilitate the site,” Moonilal said.
Moonilal said during his tenure the ponds and pumps were maintained regularly, noting there was no flooding on the site until 2017.
“For three years now they have not done any cleaning or drainage works, so it seems that they are not concerned with preventing destruction in people’s homes,” he said.