JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 6, 2025

Imbert questions reasons for Hilaire’s firing

by

Dareece Polo
10 days ago
20250626
Former Finance minister Colm Imbert during a media conference at Balisier House in Port-of-Spain yesterday.

Former Finance minister Colm Imbert during a media conference at Balisier House in Port-of-Spain yesterday.

KERWIN PIERRE

For­mer Fi­nance min­is­ter Colm Im­bert is baf­fled by the sud­den re­vo­ca­tion of Dr Alvin Hi­laire’s ap­point­ment as Cen­tral Bank gov­er­nor, es­pe­cial­ly if it stemmed from his re­fusal to name the coun­try’s top for­eign ex­change users.

Im­bert said he first learned of Hi­laire’s dis­missal af­ter read­ing a news­pa­per ar­ti­cle on the mat­ter.

Speak­ing at a press con­fer­ence held at Bal­isi­er House yes­ter­day, Im­bert ad­mit­ted he had lim­it­ed in­for­ma­tion on the cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the ter­mi­na­tion. How­ev­er, he cau­tioned that if the is­sue in­volved pres­sure on the for­mer gov­er­nor to dis­close the names of in­di­vid­u­als who re­ceived for­eign ex­change through com­mer­cial banks, such an act would con­sti­tute a crim­i­nal of­fence.

“If now the present gov­er­nor was be­ing pres­sured by the Gov­ern­ment to re­veal the names of per­sons who were in re­ceipt of for­eign ex­change and he de­clined and he got fired for that, that would be very sur­pris­ing.

“The mes­sage that is com­ing is quite as­ton­ish­ing... that the Gov­ern­ment was try­ing to get him to re­lease per­son­al and pri­vate in­for­ma­tion and he said ‘no’ and they fired him. That’s the mes­sage. But I don’t know what else went on.”

Im­bert drew par­al­lels be­tween Hi­laire’s dis­missal and the 2015 ter­mi­na­tion of his pre­de­ces­sor, Jwala Ram­bar­ran.

Ram­bar­ran’s ap­point­ment was re­voked in 2015, just weeks af­ter he raised con­cerns about the for­eign ex­change mar­ket dur­ing the Cen­tral Bank’s bi-an­nu­al Mon­e­tary Pol­i­cy Fo­rum.

Ram­bar­ran re­vealed the top five users of for­eign ex­change by sec­tor over the pre­vi­ous three years and pub­licly de­clared, based on CBTT da­ta, that the coun­try was in a re­ces­sion. His dis­missal fol­lowed short­ly there­after and in 2022, a High Court rul­ing found that Ram­bar­ran had been wrong­ful­ly ter­mi­nat­ed and award­ed him more than $5.47 mil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion. That de­ci­sion was up­held by the Court of Ap­peal in Feb­ru­ary of this year.

“The is­sue with the pre­vi­ous gov­er­nor was over the pub­li­ca­tion of the largest users of for­eign ex­change in the coun­try. That was the is­sue. And there were many le­gal opin­ions that that was a breach of the law, at the time, ok,” Im­bert said.

An­oth­er for­mer fi­nance min­is­ter, Karen Nunez-Tesheira, ac­knowl­edged that Hi­laire may have re­lied on a code of con­fi­den­tial­i­ty.

Nunez-Tesheira be­lieves the mat­ter is like­ly to end up be­fore the courts.

“It may be that the Gov­ern­ment is will­ing to pay the price for that, to have the new gov­er­nor in­stalled, some­one who they feel that will (re­spond to their de­mands) on crit­i­cal is­sues and it seems there are crit­i­cal is­sues. The Au­di­tor Gen­er­al is­sue was one and the oth­er is­sue, of course, is nam­ing the per­sons who were the main ben­e­fi­cia­ries of the gov­ern­ment’s for­eign ex­change. So per­haps they’re pre­pared to even lose at Privy Coun­cil.”

She em­pha­sised that a har­mo­nious re­la­tion­ship be­tween the Cen­tral Bank Gov­er­nor and the Gov­ern­ment is cru­cial, giv­en their shared re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for the coun­try’s fi­nan­cial health.

How­ev­er, she cau­tioned de­mo­c­ra­t­ic prin­ci­ples should nev­er be com­pro­mised es­pe­cial­ly when it comes to an of­fice of such na­tion­al im­por­tance.

Mean­while, po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist Dr Bish­nu Ra­goonath has crit­i­cised, what he said was Gov­ern­ment’s hypocrisy in risk­ing sig­nif­i­cant costs to tax­pay­ers ow­ing to the fall­out that could come.

“What we don’t want to hap­pen, and what the Gov­ern­ment has been telling us since, over the last few weeks, is sim­ply that they are not go­ing to be wast­ing mon­ey in the way the pre­vi­ous gov­ern­ment wast­ed mon­ey. If, how­ev­er, they adopt a po­si­tion that could lead the gov­ern­ment to be in con­tra­dic­tion to the law and that could cause the State to have to pay enor­mous sums in like man­ner as the PNM did when they had dis­missed Jwala Ram­bar­ran, that would be of con­cern.”

Ra­goonath al­so said the time has come to stop the politi­ci­sa­tion of top State ap­point­ments.

Ef­forts to reach Hi­laire, Ram­bar­ran, and Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar for com­ment were un­suc­cess­ful.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored