JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Lawyer who ordered hit on secretary loses appeal

by

1342 days ago
20210902
Joseph Melville

Joseph Melville

A vet­er­an at­tor­ney who or­dered a hit on his sec­re­tary that he sus­pect­ed of snitch­ing about his il­le­gal ac­tiv­i­ties, has lost his ap­peal against his con­vic­tion for at­tempt­ed mur­der.

De­liv­er­ing a writ­ten judge­ment, yes­ter­day morn­ing, Ap­pel­late Judges Al­ice Yorke- Soo Hon, Mal­colm Holdip, and Ron­nie Boodoos­ingh re­ject­ed all the grounds of ap­peal raised by Joseph Melville and af­firmed the 19 year prison sen­tence he re­ceived when he was con­vict­ed in 2017. 

In the ap­peal, Melville’s main ground of con­tention was the fact that the tri­al judge who presided over his case al­lowed pros­e­cu­tors to use the pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry tes­ti­mo­ny of one of the State’s main wit­ness­es Ains­ley Al­leyne.

Al­leyne, one of three men al­leged­ly hired by Melville to mur­der his sec­re­tary Pa­tri­cia Cox, was mur­dered be­fore the tri­al of the case and his tes­ti­mo­ny dur­ing the in­quiry was al­lowed in ev­i­dence.

Melville’s lawyer Evans Welch chal­lenged the process used by pros­e­cu­tors to ten­der his de­po­si­tion, as he ques­tioned their method of prov­ing that a head­less body iden­ti­fied as Al­leyne was in fact him through a pho­to­graph and fin­ger­prints. 

Re­spond­ing to Welch, at­tor­neys Tra­vers Sinanan and Tri­cia Hudlin-Coop­er said the tri­al judge was best placed to de­cide whether Al­leyne’s de­po­si­tion could be used based on the to­tal­i­ty of the ev­i­dence be­fore her.

In their judge­ment, the ap­peal pan­el not­ed that while the judge used an in­cor­rect pro­ce­dure to ten­der Al­leyne’s pho­to­graph in ev­i­dence for his aunt to iden­ti­fy him, the pho­to­graph could have still been used.

The pan­el al­so dis­agreed with Melville’s at­tor­ney over whether the State had pro­vid­ed enough ev­i­dence to sup­port its claim that Al­leyne was de­ceased and could not tes­ti­fy. 

The pan­el al­so re­ject­ed com­plaints over Al­leyne’s tes­ti­mo­ny, in which he (Al­leyne) al­leged­ly made prej­u­di­cial state­ments over Melville’s char­ac­ter. 

“In the event that the judge had giv­en the spe­cif­ic warn­ing to the ju­ry on how to deal with the im­pugned ev­i­dence in re­la­tion to the cred­i­bil­i­ty limb of the good char­ac­ter di­rec­tion, we do not be­lieve that it would have made a dif­fer­ence to the ver­dict giv­en the strength of the ev­i­dence,” they said. 

Ac­cord­ing to the ev­i­dence in the case, Al­leyne, Hilton Win­ches­ter and Ja­son Hold­er were hired by Melville to kid­nap and kill Cox in 2001.

Al­leyne had claimed that on June 28, 2001, he was ap­proached by Melville, through a mu­tu­al friend Hold­er, and was of­fered $40,000 to kill Cox.

“He said she (Cox) was talk­ing his busi­ness with the po­lice and Fraud Squad was get­ting close,” Al­leyne said.

 Cox, in her tes­ti­mo­ny, had ad­mit­ted that she had threat­ened to re­port him af­ter she learned that he (Melville) had cashed in two in­sur­ance poli­cies and failed to pay them to his client.

Al­leyne tes­ti­fied that he, Hold­er and Win­ches­ter got in­struc­tions from Melville to dri­ve to and wait by his of­fice at Pem­broke Street in Port-of-Spain where Cox would meet them, for what she be­lieved would be a dri­ve to col­lect le­gal doc­u­ments at a client’s home.

He said that af­ter Cox got in­to the car, Win­ches­ter drove to Cum­ber­land Hill in St James.

Be­fore reach­ing the lo­ca­tion, Al­leyne “locked” Cox’s neck while Hold­er stripped her of her clothes and jew­el­ry.

 He ad­mit­ted to at­tempt­ing to sex­u­al­ly as­sault Cox in the car but claimed to have stopped af­ter she said she said she was on her pe­ri­od.

Al­leyne said that up­on reach­ing the lo­ca­tion, they took Cox out of the car and placed her to sit on a boul­der next to a precipice as they pon­dered how they would kill her as they had no knives or guns.

“He (Hold­er) picked up a stone and said it would be the fastest way to do it,” Al­leyne said.

He said that Cox was beg­ging for her life and he in­formed her that it was Melville  who had hired them to kill her.

 Cox then of­fered to pay them a larg­er sum to for­go killing her.

“I asked her if she want­ed to hide out and pre­tend to be dead and we would split the mon­ey with her when we got paid,” he said.

Be­fore she could re­spond to her pro­pos­al, she jumped off the precipice and ran in­to a forest­ed area. Hold­er found her but was forced to let her go af­ter a man who was hik­ing in the area saw the in­ci­dent through his binoc­u­lars and raised an alarm.

Cox said she hid for a while and then hiked through the forest­ed area through the night un­til she reached a hous­ing de­vel­op­ment the next morn­ing. 

Melville, Al­leyne, Hold­er and Win­ches­ter were charged with the crime. Al­leyne was made a State wit­ness, while Hold­er was freed at the pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry stage.

Win­ches­ter was con­vict­ed along­side Melville in 2004 and was sen­tenced to ten years in prison. Melville ap­pealed his ini­tial con­vic­tion and got a re­tri­al.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored