JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, May 15, 2025

Man to get state compensation after being beaten, falsely charged by cops

by

303 days ago
20240716
Justice Frank Seepersad

Justice Frank Seepersad

NICOLE DRAYTON

DEREK ACHONG

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

A man from Diego Mar­tin, who was beat­en and false­ly charged by a group of po­lice of­fi­cers in 2017, is set to re­ceive com­pen­sa­tion from the State.

High Court Judge Frank Seep­er­sad or­dered the com­pen­sa­tion for Nicholas Owen, of Up­per La Puer­ta Av­enue, Diego Mar­tin, as he grant­ed him a de­fault judg­ment against the State yes­ter­day morn­ing.

Jus­tice Seep­er­sad’s de­ci­sion was large­ly based on the fact that the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al did not file a de­fence and counter-claim af­ter Owen brought his law­suit.

While Jus­tice Seep­er­sad still al­lowed state at­tor­ney Keron May­nard to cross-ex­am­ine Owen over his claims briefly, he even­tu­al­ly found that Owen’s lawyers Lemuel Mur­phy, Alex­ia Romero, and Sid­diq Man­zano had proven their case.

Al­though he ruled that Owen was en­ti­tled to dam­ages for as­sault and bat­tery, wrong­ful ar­rest, false im­pris­on­ment and ma­li­cious pros­e­cu­tion, such is to be as­sessed by a High Court Mas­ter at a lat­er date.

Ac­cord­ing to the ev­i­dence, the in­ci­dent in­volv­ing Owen oc­curred in his com­mu­ni­ty on No­vem­ber 5, 2017.

Owen was re­port­ed­ly walk­ing to his home, when he was stopped by a group of po­lice of­fi­cers, who were on mo­bile pa­trol, in­clud­ing one who pre­vi­ous­ly lived in the com­mu­ni­ty.

Owen claimed that the of­fi­cers threat­ened him with their firearms and ar­rest­ed him de­spite not find­ing any­thing il­le­gal on him.

He claimed that he was tak­en to the West End Po­lice Sta­tion where he was re­peat­ed­ly slapped by his for­mer neigh­bour while hand­cuffed.

“Each slap was more painful than the one that came be­fore it. All I had wished was that all of this had stopped,” he said.

Owen claimed that an­oth­er of­fi­cer joined in and punched him sev­er­al times in his head.

He claimed that his for­mer neigh­bour told him that he would kill him even­tu­al­ly.

“When I heard the state­ment I re­mem­bered all the pre­vi­ous times I was stopped and ar­rest­ed by the po­lice and be­gan to think that it was all part of a plan to have me killed,” he said.

Owen was held at the sta­tion for al­most four hours be­fore he was tak­en for med­ical treat­ment.

Af­ter be­ing dis­charged, Owen was tak­en back to the sta­tion where he was charged with us­ing ob­scene lan­guage, ob­struct­ing a po­lice of­fi­cer, and re­sist­ing ar­rest.

Owen was grant­ed bail and made a re­port to the Pro­fes­sion­al Stan­dards Bu­reau (PSB), which in­ves­ti­gates crimes al­leged­ly com­mit­ted by po­lice of­fi­cers.

In April 2018, the three of­fi­cers were charged. The most se­nior of­fi­cer, a cor­po­ral, was charged with kid­nap­ping, as­sault oc­ca­sion­ing ac­tu­al bod­i­ly harm, false im­pris­on­ment and two counts of mis­be­hav­iour in pub­lic of­fice. Owen’s for­mer neigh­bour was ac­cused of as­sault, and false im­pris­on­ment, while the third of­fi­cer was on­ly charged with as­sault.

The cor­po­ral and Owen’s for­mer neigh­bour were com­mit­ted to stand tri­al at the end of their pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry, while their col­league was freed.

Al­though the duo’s names were men­tioned through­out the court fil­ings, they were with­held by this news­pa­per as they are still await­ing tri­al.

The Of­fice of the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP) even­tu­al­ly dis­con­tin­ued the charges against Owen af­ter a video of his ar­rest, which dis­proved the claims made by the of­fi­cers over his al­leged con­duct, was wide­ly shared on so­cial me­dia.

In ad­di­tion to com­pen­sa­tion for the pain, suf­fer­ing and em­bar­rass­ment he suf­fered, Owen sought spe­cial dam­ages as he claimed that he lost out on $7,200 in in­come as a gen­er­al con­trac­tor dur­ing the pe­ri­od he was held on re­mand be­fore be­ing grant­ed bail.

He al­so sought $1,000 as he claimed that his clothes and cell­phone, which were seized up­on his ar­rest, were not re­turned to him.

In up­hold­ing the case, Jus­tice Seep­er­sad praised the PSB for its “en­cour­ag­ing” work.

“One has to hope that this sort of proac­tive and fair ap­proach by the PSB con­tin­ues,” he said.

Jus­tice Seep­er­sad al­so sug­gest­ed that their work is es­sen­tial in the fight against crime.

“The fight against crime will on­ly be suc­cess­ful when of­fi­cers be­have ap­pro­pri­ate­ly and there is pub­lic trust and con­fi­dence that they would act fair­ly,” he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored