JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, June 3, 2025

Mayor: Missing $90,000 an embarrassment to corporation

by

KEVON FELMINE
5 days ago
20250529

KEVON FELMINE

Se­nior Re­porter

kevon.felmine@guardian.co.tt

San Fer­nan­do May­or Robert Par­ris says the dis­ap­pear­ance of $90,000 from the San Fer­nan­do City Cor­po­ra­tion (SFCC) re­mains a source of deep em­bar­rass­ment to the en­tire or­gan­i­sa­tion, even as he re­it­er­ates that the mat­ter falls out­side the purview of the po­lit­i­cal arm.

This is the sec­ond time Par­ris has ad­dressed the is­sue since the funds were re­port­ed miss­ing ear­li­er this month. His lat­est com­ments came dur­ing an in­ter­view at City Hall yes­ter­day, where he al­so dis­closed that in­ves­ti­ga­tors be­lieve they now un­der­stand what tran­spired.

On May 16, an act­ing ac­coun­tant placed $6,534.50 in­to a locked cab­i­net that al­ready held $83,465.50 in sealed Re­pub­lic Bank en­velopes. When the ac­coun­tant re­turned on May 19, the cab­i­net had been opened us­ing a key, and the cash was gone. The funds re­port­ed­ly rep­re­sent­ed tax­es and fees col­lect­ed by the cor­po­ra­tion.

In­ter­nal re­port in­di­cat­ed that sev­er­al staff mem­bers had ac­cess to the cab­i­net and key but none was au­tho­rised to re­move the mon­ey. The San Fer­nan­do CID is cur­rent­ly lead­ing the in­ves­ti­ga­tion.

Par­ris said while he had not re­ceived a for­mal re­port on the in­ci­dent, he re­mained in con­tact with of­fi­cials man­ag­ing the probe.

“I want to hope that this mat­ter comes to an end very soon be­cause it is an em­bar­rass­ing sit­u­a­tion for all of us here at the San Fer­nan­do City Cor­po­ra­tion,” he said.

He added that while mem­bers of the pub­lic have raised con­cerns with him di­rect­ly, many ap­pre­ci­ate the sep­a­ra­tion be­tween the ad­min­is­tra­tive and po­lit­i­cal func­tions at City Hall.

“You go to work and you get re­mu­ner­at­ed for an hon­est day’s work and if some­thing does not be­long to you, you should not have the urge to put the or­gan­i­sa­tion in this lev­el of em­bar­rass­ment,” Par­ris said,

He added that if he held an ad­min­is­tra­tive role, dis­ci­pli­nary ac­tion would al­ready have been tak­en. He said dis­hon­esty has cre­at­ed a cli­mate of mis­trust with­in the cor­po­ra­tion.

“It is very alarm­ing and I think I made it quite clear that I feel very un­com­fort­able. I do not want to be the head of a po­lit­i­cal arm of any or­gan­i­sa­tion that is cor­rupt. They have to do what they need to do in a very trans­par­ent man­ner and who­ev­er is in­volved in these im­pro­pri­eties, they need to be dis­ci­plined,” he said.

Par­ris con­firmed that Min­is­ter of Rur­al De­vel­op­ment and Lo­cal Gov­ern­ment Khadi­jah Ameen had re­quest­ed an of­fi­cial re­port, but em­pha­sised that the re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for pro­duc­ing and sub­mit­ting it lies with chief ex­ec­u­tive of­fi­cer Heather Craw­ford.

Par­ris said Craw­ford had been work­ing on the re­port over the past week, and he hoped it had al­ready been sub­mit­ted to the min­istry’s per­ma­nent sec­re­tary for on­ward trans­mis­sion to Ameen.

The min­is­ter has since called for any­one with in­for­ma­tion about the miss­ing funds to come for­ward. She al­so vowed to re­veal the iden­ti­ty of those re­spon­si­ble once in­ves­ti­ga­tions are com­plete.

Par­ris de­clined to com­ment on the in­ter­nal op­er­a­tions of the fi­nance de­part­ment, in­clud­ing se­cu­ri­ty pro­to­cols, stat­ing that those are mat­ters for the CEO. He main­tained, how­ev­er, that he and Craw­ford en­joy a co­op­er­a­tive and pro­fes­sion­al work­ing re­la­tion­ship.

Re­flect­ing on the in­ci­dent, Par­ris—who served as coun­cil­lor for Pleas­antville for 15 years—said it was the first time in his tenure that such an event had oc­curred. While dis­ap­point­ed it had hap­pened dur­ing his may­or­ship, he stressed that nei­ther he nor his coun­cil have con­trol over day-to-day ad­min­is­tra­tive pro­ce­dures.

“All of the good things that are go­ing on in the city of San Fer­nan­do and all that hard work we have been putting in as a coun­cil... it re­al­ly damp­ens my spir­its, but I urge that the cit­i­zens of San Fer­nan­do have con­fi­dence in the sys­tem: that the in­ves­ti­ga­tion go on and, as the peo­ple say, let the chips fall as they may,” he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored