Although People’s National Movement (PNM) general secretary Foster Cummings is unmoved by calls for his resignation following the party’s April 28 General Election defeat, there are mixed views on whether he should be in the party’s executive.
Former PNM general secretary Ashton Ford says Cummings’ refusal to resign isn’t in keeping with the party’s customs.
Speaking to Guardian Media on Friday, a day after an entity calling itself the Changemakers called for Cummings’ resignation, Ford said when the party lost elections in the past, it was customary for all executive members to resign. He said in 2010 and in 1986, the secretaries resigned on principle.
Ford said, “In 2010 when we lost the elections to the same UNC, the chairman of the party Conrad Enill resigned. He wasn’t a member of parliament. Martin Joseph resigned, he was general secretary and (Patrick) Manning resigned... I have no problem with Foster but as a matter of principle, he should step down.”
Following the April 28 defeat, PNM chairman Stuart Young and campaign manager Rohan Sinanan resigned. Former prime minister Dr Keith Rowley also resigned as political leader, saying he took responsibility for the election defeat. Rowley then revoked the appointments of Dr Nyan Gadsby-Dolly and Colm Imbert as deputy leaders. However, they were selected as chairman and deputy chairman during a special General Council meeting last week.
Responding to calls for his resignation from others, including the Gamechangers, last week, Cummings said he could not be blamed for the election defeat, as he was not consulted on nor did he approve of the strategy that led to the PNM’s loss.
Meanwhile, PNM founding member Ferdie Ferreira said he believes Cummings may not be entirely lying when he says he was not part of the campaign’s decision-making, as Dr Rowley and Young may have had the final say.
He believes the position of general secretary is an important one and a member of parliament should not have held it.
Ferreira said, “The general secretary is the general manager of the party. He is the person responsible for ensuring that the party’s election machinery is on a properly lubricated and on good footing but it may be partly true. The problem started with Rowley holding on to political leader position and passing the prime ministership, so he has Stuart on a leash.”
Ferreira also believes the current issues within the party may be linked to a lack of proper leadership as there’s no interim political leader. He said if the General Council believes Beckles is good enough to be Opposition Leader, she should also be interim leader.
And though Cummings previously said the party’s constitution does not allow for an interim leader, Ferreira said Dr Rowley was interim leader after the party’s election loss in 2010 until a convention was held in 2011.
However, former executive member Robert Le Hunte rubbished calls for Cummings to resign.
He said Cummings is a long-standing member and at this point, the party needs good leadership.
“I have noted the call for him to resign. However, if Cummings had resigned as part of the leadership together with Mrs Camille Robinson-Regis, who was also part of the leadership at that time, we would have ended up with just one person being there and I think it is important that the party can function and move forward,” he outlined.
General Council member Jennifer Baptiste-Primus also questioned why Cummings should resign.
She said Rowley is to blame for the loss and Cummings should not be made a scapegoat.
She said the party should now focus on setting a date for the internal elections and the convention.
