JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Moonilal replies to Pritchard demanding details on alleged probe

by

1286 days ago
20210909
ROODAL MOONILAL

ROODAL MOONILAL

Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress MP Dr Roodal Mooni­lal has called on re­tired Rear Ad­mi­ral Hay­den Pritchard to give de­tails of the role he al­leged­ly played in a probe of po­lice of­fi­cers.

Pritchard, in re­turn, has rec­om­mend­ed Mooni­lal take his queries to his Par­lia­men­tary col­leagues in the Gov­ern­ment.

The war of words con­tin­ued af­ter Mooni­lal brought up Pritchard on Mon­day, say­ing the hir­ing of two pri­vate cit­i­zens to in­ves­ti­gate the con­duct of po­lice of­fi­cers in 2020 was un­law­ful.

On Tues­day, how­ev­er, Pritchard fired back in a blis­ter­ing let­ter to Mooni­lal cov­er­ing var­i­ous points.

Yes­ter­day, Mooni­lal re­spond­ed to the let­ter sent to his pri­vate email.

“My apolo­gies for not recog­nis­ing ini­tial­ly his Rear Ad­mi­ral­ty, as in­deed the Rear Ad­mi­ral was not aware that I go by the ti­tle ‘Dr’, which is not con­ferred via a po­lit­i­cal process. It’s nei­ther my in­ten­tion to trade in­vec­tive and in­sults, for which I’m al­so well equipped. There’s no need to ex­change re­sumes or give char­ac­ter ev­i­dence. This mat­ter is a very se­ri­ous one in­volv­ing the un­law­ful es­tab­lish­ment of a se­cret two-man squad to in­ves­ti­gate the work­ings of a unit with­in the struc­ture of the in­de­pen­dent T&T Po­lice Ser­vice.’’

Say­ing he felt Pritchard protest­ed too much, Mooni­lal added, “The in­quir­ers of a se­cret probe, out­side of pub­lic knowl­edge, go­ing on for months, have been ex­posed in twen­ty-four hours. In­deed, the Rear Ad­mi­ral, like NGC’s di­rec­tors, may con­sid­er re­quest­ing an in­dem­ni­ty from Kei­th Row­ley for what­ev­er task was un­der­tak­en.”

Mooni­lal said now that Pritchard “has been drawn out in the light and be­lat­ed­ly stepped for­ward on the se­cret in­ves­ti­ga­tion” in­to TTPS of­fi­cers, he should pro­vide per­ti­nent de­tails to tax­pay­ers.

“Mr Pritchard must tell the na­tion the terms of en­gage­ment, in­clud­ing his re­mu­ner­a­tion, for the clan­des­tine project. For some­one tout­ing his proud mil­i­tary back­ground, he should in­di­cate un­der what law he was re­tained for the ex­er­cise of re­view­ing con­fi­den­tial po­lice files and in­ter­view­ing of­fi­cers.

“The two-man in­ves­ti­gat­ing com­mit­tee had no le­gal sta­tus to un­der­take any in­quiry. The po­lice would have been with­in their right to chase both gen­tle­men out of Po­lice Head­quar­ters. The Rear Ad­mi­ral must in­di­cate who re­tained him for the stealth project. Was it the Prime Min­is­ter or Min­is­ter Stu­art Young? And whether he felt it was ap­pro­pri­ate to be ap­point­ed by a politi­cian for such an as­sign­ment.”

Mooni­lal added, “He should state whether he, as Chief of De­fence Staff, would have been com­fort­able with a sur­rep­ti­tious probe in­to his stew­ard­ship, and one con­duct­ed out­side of the in­de­pen­dent ad­min­is­tra­tive and reg­u­la­to­ry frame­work.”

“The much deep­er is­sue, un­re­lat­ed to the Rear Ad­mi­ral and his medals,” Mooni­lal al­leged, “Is that Row­ley has on sev­er­al oc­ca­sions abused the po­si­tion of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Coun­cil chair­man. This is a pol­i­cy-mak­ing Cab­i­net sub-com­mit­tee, not an op­er­a­tional arm of law en­force­ment. The Prime Min­is­ter brought po­lice of­fi­cers from Bar­ba­dos to in­ves­ti­gate the DSS mat­ter, he had no au­thor­i­ty to do so. The Prime Min­is­ter can­not in­ves­ti­gate the Po­lice Ser­vice. He may re­fer a mat­ter to the DPP or the PCA if he has in­for­ma­tion that crim­i­nal wrong­do­ing has been un­der­tak­en. They can prop­er­ly cause an in­ves­ti­ga­tion.”

He added, “It’s a trav­es­ty this Gov­ern­ment will ex­pend con­sid­er­able re­sources, time and en­er­gy to find out how firearms got in­to the hands of law-abid­ing cit­i­zens but will not in­quire how thou­sands of guns get in­to the hands of crim­i­nal el­e­ments.”

He told Pritchard, “My work isn’t a pop­u­lar­i­ty con­test. As an Op­po­si­tion mem­ber, I take on pow­er­ful min­is­ters and a rag­ing Prime Min­is­ter every day of my pro­fes­sion­al life, I will not be in­tim­i­dat­ed by a re­tired sailor!’’

Con­tact­ed on Mooni­lal’s state­ment, Pritchard first con­veyed apolo­gies for not us­ing Mooni­lal’s ti­tle of “Dr” in his re­sponse to him on Tues­day. He said this was not in­ten­tion­al.

How­ev­er, he rec­om­mend­ed that Mooni­lal for­ward all in­quiries on mat­ters of the probe to Mooni­lal’s “ap­pro­pri­ate Par­lia­men­tary col­leagues who are in the Gov­ern­ment.”

“There will be no fur­ther com­ment from me on these mat­ters,” Pritchard added.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored