JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

No consensus

by

8 days ago
20250422

Trinida­di­ans and To­bag­o­ni­ans re­main di­vid­ed on the is­sue of full au­ton­o­my for To­ba­go, with no na­tion­al con­sen­sus on the way for­ward.

This is re­flect­ed in the re­sults of a new pub­lic opin­ion poll com­mis­sioned by Guardian Me­dia and con­duct­ed by Pro­fes­sor Hamid Ghany.

The in­de­pen­dent sur­vey, con­duct­ed be­tween April 10 and 13, so­licit­ed the views of cit­i­zens in 11 mar­gin­al con­stituen­cies in Trinidad, as well as in To­ba­go.

Asked whether To­ba­go should be giv­en full au­ton­o­my, the ma­jor­i­ty of the 1,650 re­spon­dents in Trinidad (57 per cent) said “No,” com­pared to 22 per cent who said “yes.” The re­main­ing 21 per cent were un­de­cid­ed.

How­ev­er, when the same ques­tion was posed to 530 re­spon­dents in To­ba­go, most of those sur­veyed – 41 per cent – sup­port­ed such a move, while 32 per cent were against the is­land tak­ing full charge of its own af­fairs. The oth­er 28 per cent of re­spon­dents were non-com­mit­tal.

Au­ton­o­my for To­ba­go with­in the con­text of the twin-is­land Re­pub­lic has been a long­stand­ing is­sue, with the Con­sti­tu­tion­al (Amend­ment) (To­ba­go Self Gov­ern­ment) Bill 2020 and the To­ba­go Is­land Gov­ern­ment Bill 2021 on the or­der pa­per of the Trinidad and To­ba­go Par­lia­ment since 2021.

When the bills fi­nal­ly came up for de­bate last De­cem­ber, the To­ba­go Is­land Gov­ern­ment Bill 2021 was passed in­to law. How­ev­er, the Op­po­si­tion Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) used its num­bers to de­feat the Con­sti­tu­tion­al (Amend­ment) (To­ba­go Self Gov­ern­ment) Bill 2020, pre­vent­ing the Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment (PNM) Gov­ern­ment from push­ing ahead with that leg­is­la­tion.

Then-Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley had sought to get ap­proval for the read­ing of leg­is­la­tion to amend the Con­sti­tu­tion “to ac­cord self-gov­ern­ment to To­ba­go and for re­lat­ed mat­ters to be forth­with read a third time and passed” af­ter the claus­es to the leg­is­la­tion had been ap­proved in the com­mit­tee stages.

How­ev­er, when the mat­ter, which re­quired a spe­cial ma­jor­i­ty of the 41-mem­ber Par­lia­ment, was put to vote, 21 Gov­ern­ment leg­is­la­tors vot­ed in favour while 16 of the Op­po­si­tion mem­bers present vot­ed against the move.

The Op­po­si­tion, which was round­ly crit­i­cised at the time by the Gov­ern­ment, had cit­ed con­cerns over in­suf­fi­cient con­sul­ta­tion and the need for more sub­stan­tial re­forms.

The self-gov­ern­ment leg­is­la­tion, which is seen as a first step to au­ton­o­my, pro­pos­es to in­crease To­ba­go’s share of the na­tion­al bud­get from a min­i­mum of 4.03% to 6.8% and to grant the To­ba­go House of As­sem­bly the au­thor­i­ty to pass laws on lo­cal mat­ters with­out cen­tral gov­ern­ment over­sight. It al­so seeks to es­tab­lish a more de­fined fed­er­al re­la­tion­ship be­tween Trinidad and To­ba­go.

The poll was con­duct­ed in the mar­gin­al con­stituen­cies of Barataria/San Juan, Ch­agua­nas East, Cu­mu­to/Man­zanil­la, La Hor­quet­ta/Tal­paro, Ma­yaro, Moru­ga/Table­land, Pointe-a-Pierre (now called Clax­ton Bay), San Fer­nan­do West, St Joseph, To­co/San­gre Grande and Tu­na­puna, as well as To­ba­go.

It has a mar­gin of er­ror of +/- 2.5 per cent for Trinidad and +/- 4.0 per cent based on re­cent po­lit­i­cal and bound­ary shifts.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored