Opposition politicians were quick to have their say on the decision yesterday to have Stuart Young serve as Prime Minister when Dr Keith Rowley steps down from the position.
National Transformation Alliance leader Gary Griffith warned the public to brace for what he believes will be a major civil war within the PNM, given Young’s transition to the role of Prime Minister.
“I think this has been a platter for opposition parties to walk into. People are fully aware of Stuart Young and who he is. I am not going into personalities but leadership plays a very big part in the direction a country is deciding upon when it votes. People know Stuart Young and how he operated. And as much as I want to wish the PNM well, wishes will not stop what is going to happen to the PNM in the very near future because everyone in the PNM knows about Stuart Young,” Griffith said.
UNC deputy leader Dr Roodal Moonilal, in a telephone interview, said, “Last Friday, we had a pilot suicide as Rowley crashed the Government. Today, we discover that the PNM has no impact substitute. A few weeks again to salvation, as the UNC must return to office. Only Kamla Persad-Bissessar is left standing to rescue this country.”
Movement for National Development leader Garvin Nicholas was not impressed with the announcement of Young’s impending elevation to one of the country’s highest posts.
“If this is the best that the PNM can do then so be it. I hope that the population, inclusive of former PNM voters, will be more discerning when it’s time for them to vote. Minister Young represents the very worst of what leaders have evolved into. His arrogance and willingness to twist the truth in knots will not be beneficial to the citizens. Just when I thought we couldn’t descend any lower, we have.”
Mayaro MP Rushton Paray said, “The announcement of Stuart Young as the new night watchman of the PNM is simply a reshuffling of the deck chairs. The party has collapsed under its own weight due to failed policies, poor governance, and a disconnect from the needs of the people. Changing the face at the helm doesn’t address the systemic issues or restore confidence. It’s like changing the icing on a cake that has already failed to rise—it doesn’t change the taste or the outcome.”