JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Police monitoring claims made in Housing Minister’s matter

by

Shane Superville
3 days ago
20250326
Deputy Commissioner of Police  Curt Simon

Deputy Commissioner of Police Curt Simon

While they have con­firmed that there is no on­go­ing in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to the ac­tiv­i­ties of an al­leged Trinida­di­an-born, UK-based gang­ster, se­nior po­lice say they are pay­ing at­ten­tion to the mat­ter, giv­en the se­ri­ous­ness of the al­le­ga­tions be­ing made.

On Sun­day, a me­dia re­port claimed that a high-rank­ing Gov­ern­ment of­fi­cial was one of two peo­ple linked to a com­pa­ny formed in the UK in Sep­tem­ber 2023, and that the oth­er di­rec­tor was lat­er al­leged­ly dis­cov­ered to have in­ter­na­tion­al crim­i­nal ties across the Unit­ed States, the Caribbean, and Eu­rope.

In a re­lease on Mon­day, Hous­ing Min­is­ter Adri­an Leonce con­firmed he had set up an en­gi­neer­ing and con­struc­tion busi­ness in the UK with an in­di­vid­ual, but con­tend­ed he ter­mi­nat­ed the com­pa­ny and ties with the man af­ter learn­ing he was fac­ing a crim­i­nal probe in Ju­ly 2024.

Leonce de­nied any wrong­do­ing, say­ing the on­ly con­nec­tion be­tween him­self and the man was for the pur­pos­es of reg­is­ter­ing the busi­ness.

The me­dia re­port claimed that the gang­ster, who has lived in Britain for years, was in­volved in var­i­ous crimes, in­clud­ing mon­ey laun­der­ing and arms traf­fick­ing from the US to the Caribbean, in­clud­ing T&T.

Asked for a com­ment on the mat­ter at yes­ter­day’s TTPS me­dia brief­ing at the Po­lice Ad­min­is­tra­tion Build­ing in Port-of-Spain, DCP Curt Si­mon said there were no in­ves­ti­ga­tions in­to the mat­ter.

Pressed on whether an in­ves­ti­ga­tion would be like­ly, Si­mon on­ly not­ed that the mat­ter was not go­ing un­no­ticed.

“You have to de­ter­mine first if there is a crime. So, we are see­ing in­sti­tu­tions be­ing called and per­sons be­ing giv­en per­haps some sort of la­bels as to who might be some crime boss and all that sort of thing. All these things re­al­ly do need to be nec­es­sar­i­ly ver­i­fied and then you need to know if there is an of­fence at all,” Si­mon said.

“So, we would not tell the pub­lic that it does not con­cern us, but we are not go­ing to promise the pub­lic right now, from what is be­ing seen and said, that there is go­ing to be an in­ves­ti­ga­tion. What we can say is we con­sid­er our­self a very re­spon­si­ble en­ti­ty and there is some­thing out there in the pub­lic and we are look­ing at it.”

One of­fi­cer as­signed to an in­ves­tiga­tive unit told Guardian Me­dia that a search of the TTPS data­base showed there were no records of the pur­port­ed gang­ster be­ing ar­rest­ed or charged for any crimes in T&T.

The source con­firmed that the on­ly en­tries un­der the man’s name were three stop-and-search ex­er­cis­es con­duct­ed in 2009, 2014 and 2016, all in Scar­bor­ough, To­ba­go.

Mean­while, re­spond­ing to Guardian Me­dia’s ques­tions via email yes­ter­day, a rep­re­sen­ta­tive for the British Met­ro­pol­i­tan Po­lice said they could not ver­i­fy if the man was the sub­ject of any in­ves­ti­ga­tions from their agency, as ad­di­tion­al de­tails would be need­ed for a com­pre­hen­sive search to con­firm whether he was be­ing in­ves­ti­gat­ed.

“The way we work is that we need a time/date/lo­ca­tion and na­ture of crime to be able to search our sys­tems; we don’t run search­es on named in­di­vid­u­als who may form part of our in­ves­ti­ga­tions,” the of­fi­cial said.

The spokesper­son added that the British Met­ro­pol­i­tan Po­lice on­ly has purview over Lon­don, where­as oth­er British law en­force­ment bod­ies like the Na­tion­al Crime Agency may have ju­ris­dic­tion over oth­er re­gions of Eng­land.

Asked if the British Met­ro­pol­i­tan Po­lice could pro­vide any as­sur­ance that Trinida­di­an na­tion­als in­volved in crime in the UK would be dealt with, the spokesper­son said, “It does not mat­ter where you come from, we po­lice with­out fear nor favour and any al­le­ga­tions of crim­i­nal­i­ty will be as­sessed and in­ves­ti­gat­ed with those re­spon­si­ble put be­fore the courts.”

Guardian Me­dia at­tempt­ed to con­tact Min­is­ter of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Mar­vin Gon­za­les and Min­is­ter in the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Kei­th Scot­land for com­ment but was un­suc­cess­ful up to press time.

In a me­dia re­lease, Op­po­si­tion MP and shad­ow min­is­ter of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Roodal Mooni­lal ac­cused Leonce of not fol­low­ing due dili­gence by “vet­ting” the man, whom he de­scribed as a “great in­ter­est” to law en­force­ment agen­cies across dif­fer­ent ter­ri­to­ries.

Mooni­lal added that it was “dis­turb­ing” that Prime Min­is­ter Stu­art Young had ap­point­ed some­one to of­fice who un­der­took busi­ness arrange­ments with such peo­ple.

“Mr Leonce’s ac­tions re­veal an alarm­ing lack of due care and at­ten­tion and raise con­cerns about whether he has tak­en that ab­sence of stan­dard and com­pe­tence to his min­is­te­r­i­al of­fice.

“Now that Mr Leonce has iden­ti­fied him­self as the sub­ject of my ex­pose, he should in­di­cate whether he has de­clared his busi­ness ven­tures to the In­tegri­ty Com­mis­sion, as re­quired by law. Mr Leonce has a re­spon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­vide clar­i­ty on these is­sues.”

Con­tact­ed on Mon­day about the is­sue, In­tegri­ty Com­mis­sion chair­man Hay­den Git­tens said he was not aware if Leonce had in fact de­clared that he had an in­ter­est in a UK com­pa­ny. How­ev­er, he said he pre­ferred not to com­ment di­rect­ly on those mat­ters.

Git­tens ex­plained, though, that there is noth­ing pre­vent­ing a gov­ern­ment mem­ber from open­ing a busi­ness or be­com­ing a di­rec­tor of a busi­ness, but said there is a dis­clo­sure re­quire­ment as part of the In­tegri­ty in Pub­lic Life Act.

“The form B re­quires a dis­clo­sure if you have that in­ter­est, which may or may not cre­ate a con­flict sit­u­a­tion. It would not be a breach sim­ply open­ing the busi­ness or ac­count. If you do not de­clare, then a per­son would be in con­tra­ven­tion of the act.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored