JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, June 9, 2025

State to pay $3M to siblings charged with murder

by

Derek Achong
38 days ago
20250503
High Court Judge  Margaret Mohammed

High Court Judge Margaret Mohammed

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

The State has been or­dered to pay over $3 mil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion for breach­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al rights of a pair of sib­lings from Diego Mar­tin, who were re­mand­ed to adult prison fa­cil­i­ties af­ter be­ing charged with mur­der along with two adults.

In May 2021, the Unit­ed King­dom-based Privy Coun­cil up­held the fi­nal ap­peal of Sasha and Bri­an Seep­er­sad and re­mit­ted the is­sue of com­pen­sa­tion to the lo­cal courts. 

The com­pen­sa­tion was as­sessed by High Court Judge Mar­garet Mo­hammed on Tues­day. 

In her judg­ment, Jus­tice Mo­hammed was high­ly crit­i­cal of the State’s fail­ure to prop­er­ly ac­com­mo­date them while they were mi­nors. 

Stat­ing that the court had to reg­is­ter its dis­gust for the State’s con­duct, Jus­tice Mo­hammed said, “The De­fen­dant must be pun­ished for such ap­palling con­duct and the Court must send a strong mes­sage in or­der to de­ter the De­fen­dants, their ser­vants and/or agents from re­peat­ing the con­duct as was demon­strat­ed in this ac­tion.”

“In my view, it is shock­ing that this ap­palling con­duct was com­mit­ted by the State which has a le­gal oblig­a­tion to pro­tect all mi­nors,” she added. 

In Jan­u­ary 2014, the sib­lings, a 16-year-old boy, and 18-year-old Ste­fan Fred­er­ick were charged with rob­bing and mur­der­ing 54-year-old Dul­raj Boy­an De­o­dath. 

De­o­dath was blud­geoned to death at his Sea Trace, Bagatelle, home, and was robbed of a $150,000 truck, a leaf blow­er, jew­ellery and cash. 

At the time, Sasha was 16 and her broth­er was 12 years old. 

They were de­tained at the Arou­ca Women’s Prison and the Youth Train­ing Cen­tre (YTC) for six­teen months be­fore Bri­an was trans­ferred to the St Michael’s School for Boys in Diego Mar­tin.

His sis­ter was briefly de­tained at the St Jude’s Home for Girls.  

The sib­lings, through their lawyers led by Anand Ram­lo­gan, SC, of Free­dom Law Cham­bers, filed a law­suit al­leg­ing that the Chil­dren’s Act and oth­er leg­is­la­tion re­lat­ed to chil­dren’s rights re­quired that mi­nors fac­ing tri­al for crim­i­nal of­fences be housed in com­mu­ni­ty res­i­dences de­signed to cater specif­i­cal­ly to their needs.

Af­ter their case was ini­tial­ly up­held by Jus­tice Vasheist Kokaram, Bri­an was trans­ferred to a com­mu­ni­ty res­i­dence in Port-of-Spain that was es­tab­lished by the State. 

He was even­tu­al­ly re­turned to YTC when he turned 16 in 2017. 

In 2018, the Court of Ap­peal con­sid­ered their case and up­held Jus­tice Kokaram’s rul­ing that their de­ten­tion con­tra­vened the Chil­dren’s Act. 

How­ev­er, the Ap­peal Court over­ruled his find­ings on their con­sti­tu­tion­al rights breach­es and the $450,000 com­pen­sa­tion he or­dered. 

In 2019, Bri­an was among a group of five in­mates at the YTC, who man­aged to es­cape.

Sev­er­al months lat­er, he was killed in an al­leged shoot-out with po­lice at a house in Mor­vant.

The sib­lings’ moth­er was per­mit­ted to con­tin­ue the case on his be­half and will now col­lect the com­pen­sa­tion award­ed to him, this week, based on the Privy Coun­cil re­ver­sal of the Court of Ap­peal’s de­ci­sion on dam­ages. 

In as­sess­ing the ap­pro­pri­ate com­pen­sa­tion for the sib­lings, Jus­tice Mo­hammed de­cid­ed on $850,000 in com­pen­sato­ry dam­ages for Bri­an and $730,000 for his sis­ter. 

Her as­sess­ment was main­ly based on the sib­lings’ lengthy de­ten­tion in “op­pres­sive and ap­palling” con­di­tions at prison fa­cil­i­ties with adults. 

She al­so not­ed that the sib­lings were ex­posed to sex­u­al as­sault by fel­low in­mates. 

“The ef­fect of the De­fen­dant’s fail­ure meant that Bri­an was ex­posed to sex­u­al abuse dur­ing his de­ten­tion which vi­o­lat­ed his in­no­cence as a mi­nor and Sasha’s in­no­cence was al­so vi­o­lat­ed as she was con­stant­ly be­ing threat­ened with sex­u­al abuse by adult in­mates,” she said. 

“Bri­an’s bod­i­ly in­tegri­ty was com­pro­mised and his in­no­cence per­vert­ed by be­ing forced to show­er naked in front of adults de­spite re­quests for the prison of­fi­cers to move,” she added.

Jus­tice Mo­hammed al­so not­ed that Sasha was beat­en by a group of prison of­fi­cers at the Women’s Prison and filed a sep­a­rate case, which is still pend­ing. 

She al­so not­ed that Sasha was not al­lowed to prac­tice her re­li­gious be­lief as a Mus­lim. 

“Sasha was deal­ing with a very chal­leng­ing en­vi­ron­ment in her long de­ten­tion and the fail­ure to make arrange­ments for Sasha to prac­tice her re­li­gious be­liefs meant that she did not even have spir­i­tu­al guid­ance and hope,” she said. 

She ruled that Bri­an and Sasha were en­ti­tled to $1 mil­lion and $500,000 in vin­di­ca­to­ry dam­ages, re­spec­tive­ly, to high­light the egre­gious con­duct of the State. 

“In this re­gard, a sig­nif­i­cant award for vin­di­ca­to­ry dam­ages is nec­es­sary in or­der to reg­is­ter the Court’s dis­ap­proval for the De­fen­dant’s con­duct and to act as a de­ter­rence and to pun­ish the De­fen­dant,” she said. 

She al­so crit­i­cised the State for trans­fer­ring the sib­lings to St Michael’s and St Jude’s de­spite know­ing that both fa­cil­i­ties did not meet the stan­dards of a com­mu­ni­ty res­i­dence based on a re­port pub­lished in 2015. 

“Yet the De­fen­dants know­ing­ly in­ten­tion­al­ly and de­lib­er­ate­ly chose to dis­re­gard the find­ings of the 2015 re­port and did noth­ing to ad­dress the con­di­tions Bri­an and Sasha were kept in at those fa­cil­i­ties,” she said. 

As part of her judg­ment, Jus­tice Mo­hammed or­dered the State to pay the sib­lings’ le­gal costs for the case. 

The sib­lings were al­so rep­re­sent­ed by Renu­ka Ramb­ha­jan, Jayan­ti Lutch­me­di­al, Ganesh Sa­roop, and Natasha Bis­ram. 

Am­ri­ta Ram­sook rep­re­sent­ed the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al. 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored